Started By
Message

re: Under Armour ponies up for Notre Dame’s renewal

Posted on 8/4/23 at 7:29 pm to
Posted by TheJones
Member since Nov 2009
34396 posts
Posted on 8/4/23 at 7:29 pm to
This isn’t 1997. We don’t need every possible penny from an apparel provider

Those contracts are small potatoes in today’s landscape
Posted by MrAUTigers
Florida
Member since Sep 2013
29588 posts
Posted on 8/4/23 at 7:32 pm to
screw me once, shame on you. screw me twice............
Posted by TheJones
Member since Nov 2009
34396 posts
Posted on 8/4/23 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

screw me twice.........

Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
47426 posts
Posted on 8/4/23 at 11:58 pm to
quote:

This isn’t 1997. We don’t need every possible penny from an apparel provider

Nearly 10% of our revenue is not small potatoes
Posted by TheJones
Member since Nov 2009
34396 posts
Posted on 8/5/23 at 6:18 am to
I’m not suggesting we get nothing Just think the difference in what we’d get from each apparel provider is a few million annually
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
23567 posts
Posted on 8/5/23 at 10:16 am to
Just looking at that picture, who will be switching out all those pictures with the UA logo on the gloves and clothes all throughout the new building?

Does Nike or Adidas just send a bunch of new pictures that are all just players modeling the new gear with no game or practice shots? Are there any currently with the Russell logo visible and how does UA feel about that if there are?

Seems there's a lot of work that could possibly go into a switch that has nothing do do with just the apparel and gear that I've never thought about.
This post was edited on 8/5/23 at 10:17 am
Posted by bird35
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
13405 posts
Posted on 8/5/23 at 1:19 pm to
I believe switching would help in basketball recruiting as Nike has a lot of high school stuff and I’m not sure we are allowed to host or even attend.

Posted by AdamsHouseCat
Member since Aug 2011
502 posts
Posted on 8/5/23 at 3:23 pm to
"Founder of Under Armour in the football facility today."

click clack?
Posted by MrAUTigers
Florida
Member since Sep 2013
29588 posts
Posted on 8/15/23 at 2:58 pm to
I guess there is no new news?
Posted by AUHighPlainsDrifter
South Carolina
Member since Sep 2017
3213 posts
Posted on 8/15/23 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

I guess there is no new news?


I don't believe our contract with UA expires for another year. I'd imagine that we're shopping around right now to see what Nike or Adidas might offer.
Posted by mckibaj
Member since Nov 2010
8024 posts
Posted on 8/15/23 at 4:16 pm to
quote:

I don't believe our contract with UA expires for another year. I'd imagine that we're shopping around right now to see what Nike or Adidas might offer.


Cohen acted like details would come out in September.
Posted by Rhymenoceros
Atlanta, Georgia
Member since Nov 2012
4642 posts
Posted on 8/15/23 at 4:22 pm to
quote:


Cohen acted like details would come out in September.


The exclusivity provision of the UA deal runs out this fall, meaning we cannot openly negotiate with any other brands until then. If we go with UA, it will likley be renewed before that runs out, but if we get to September without a renewal deal, I would think the chances of sticking with UA would be less than 10%. No reason for UA to hold out on their best offer.
This post was edited on 8/15/23 at 4:23 pm
Posted by MTurbo
Birmingham
Member since Nov 2010
1893 posts
Posted on 8/15/23 at 4:37 pm to
Bring on the All in Motion™ contract!!

first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter