Started By
Message
Posted on 7/30/13 at 7:33 pm to Aubie Spr96
If were a recruit I would be at USCw or UCLA if I wanted to leave Alabama
Posted on 7/30/13 at 7:47 pm to olemillchawky
Yep. Either ultra party or ultra elite schools if I wanted out.
Posted on 7/30/13 at 7:53 pm to Aubie Spr96
quote:
Kipp Adams ?@KippLAdams 49m Auburn HS LB Rashaan Evans says he has talked it over with his parents and will have a new top five tomorrow.
Posted on 7/30/13 at 7:58 pm to TTsTowel
Hot damn. He's worse than my wife.
Posted on 7/30/13 at 8:00 pm to TTsTowel
Calling it now:
Bama
UGA
AU
UCLA
UT
And commits to AU at some point after the Mississippi State game
Bama
UGA
AU
UCLA
UT
And commits to AU at some point after the Mississippi State game
Posted on 7/30/13 at 8:13 pm to TheSandman
I'd agree with this but for some reason the local kids want to leave Au all the time
Eta; I do think that we land Evans
Eta; I do think that we land Evans
This post was edited on 7/30/13 at 8:14 pm
Posted on 7/30/13 at 8:34 pm to HailToTheChiz
My buddy whom is a very good Bama insider and knows his shite said at one point today Evans was on commit watch. Also said The lb they flipped today will get the Bryant scholarship.and not count towards their 85
Posted on 7/30/13 at 8:44 pm to AUtigR24
quote:Not doubting your friend, but both of those things were message board rumors started on BOL today
My buddy whom is a very good Bama insider and knows his shite said at one point today Evans was on commit watch. Also said The lb they flipped today will get the Bryant scholarship.and not count towards their 85
Posted on 7/30/13 at 8:47 pm to AMM AU9893
Just passing it along. I still feel good about Evans and want he and ROC bad
Posted on 7/30/13 at 8:48 pm to AUtigR24
Can you explain how bama can have a rule that goes against the NCAA?
if a player is on scholarship, the scholarship should count against the 85....correct?
if a player is on scholarship, the scholarship should count against the 85....correct?
Posted on 7/30/13 at 8:52 pm to HailToTheChiz
quote:
if a player is on scholarship, the scholarship should count against the 85....correct?
That's what I thought.
Posted on 7/30/13 at 8:53 pm to HailToTheChiz
It doesn't go against the NCAA.
It's a university-wide scholarship that is awarded outside of any athletic stipulations.
So, the player in question is not on "athletic scholarship."
However, this specific type of financial aid falls in line with other non-football scholarships in that if the player in question ever plays in a game, he automatically starts counting towards the 85-athletic scholarship limit.
It's a university-wide scholarship that is awarded outside of any athletic stipulations.
So, the player in question is not on "athletic scholarship."
However, this specific type of financial aid falls in line with other non-football scholarships in that if the player in question ever plays in a game, he automatically starts counting towards the 85-athletic scholarship limit.
Posted on 7/30/13 at 8:53 pm to HailToTheChiz
Grandfathered in. But as soon as he plays, he counts towards 85. It's the Bryant scholly.
Posted on 7/30/13 at 8:55 pm to Weagle25
Think of it like a baseball/track/whatever player trying out for the football team.
He can be on the team, practice with the team, and dress out at games, but as long as he doesn't see action on the field, his scholarship doesn't count as a "football" scholarship.
However, the second he steps on that field while the clock is running, he becomes a scholarship football player and counts against the 85.
He can be on the team, practice with the team, and dress out at games, but as long as he doesn't see action on the field, his scholarship doesn't count as a "football" scholarship.
However, the second he steps on that field while the clock is running, he becomes a scholarship football player and counts against the 85.
Posted on 7/30/13 at 8:58 pm to TheSandman
Ah...I gotcha...great explanation

Posted on 7/30/13 at 8:59 pm to Weagle25
It's a scholarship not related to the player's athletic achievements (or lack thereof). Hundreds of regular students have gone to UA on Bryant scholarships and not played football. If one of those students chooses to walk on, the NCAA has to rule about whether or not he was a "recruited athlete". If the player was not recruited, he will never count against the 85.
In Holcombe's case, he is clearly a recruited athlete and he'll begin counting against the 85 immediately. AFAIK there is no precedent for whether or not he counts against the SEC's 25 player class cap, but I assume he will not.
The key is that its a scholarship the dude would have been eligible for whether he played football or not. That's what makes it different from a booster just handing out cash to walk-ons.
In Holcombe's case, he is clearly a recruited athlete and he'll begin counting against the 85 immediately. AFAIK there is no precedent for whether or not he counts against the SEC's 25 player class cap, but I assume he will not.
The key is that its a scholarship the dude would have been eligible for whether he played football or not. That's what makes it different from a booster just handing out cash to walk-ons.
Posted on 7/31/13 at 3:22 am to AUtigR24
Hate to break it to the Bams but any football player on any kind of scholly counts against the 85 and 25. This in effect is the Bryant Rule so schools don't stockpile passed the 85 with players on nonathletic scholarships.
Also, if they have found a loophole it is closed if Holcombe signs any kind of NLI in February because NLIs automatically count to that years 25 limit.
Also, if they have found a loophole it is closed if Holcombe signs any kind of NLI in February because NLIs automatically count to that years 25 limit.
Posted on 7/31/13 at 6:25 am to AU13
quote:
If one of those students chooses to walk on, the NCAA has to rule about whether or not he was a "recruited athlete".
Flipped his commitment from Miss State to Bama & in his own words "got my dream off today" = recruited. Should be no question about it.
This post was edited on 7/31/13 at 6:26 am
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top



1








