
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/3/26 at 6:44 pm to PBD4BAMA
Same OLine (quality) as the past 2 years that scored 34 and 24 in just 1 half against Georgia…..only problem was Georgia deciding to to take away the MOF against Ty with 1-high Safety coverages and/or M2M, and deciding to go play zone also go to single high coverages by rolling it to the passing strength vs Milroe, which resulted in being shutout both halves (besides the RW heroics) after scoring 58 combined points in the 1st halves.
This is a perfect illustration of what I’m trying to explain about CKD’s offense….So did the OLine drop 34 points and 355 yards in 2 quarters on UGA then just forget how to block the same exact guys after a 20 minute halftime break?
Or last year’s Oline that put up
24 points and 283 yards in 2 quarters in Athens also forget how to block the same guys or did Kirby just fire his guys up better at halftime or get the deer antler spray going….
Surely the schematic adjustments couldn’t have possibly had anything to do with the OLine looking incredible while dropping 600+ yards in the 1st half of both games, and then gaining a combined 94 yards in the 2nd half of those same two games……Booker/Proctor and Brailsford must have all just decided to take it easy on the Dawgs so people wouldn’t change the channel bc it was a blowout.
This is a perfect illustration of what I’m trying to explain about CKD’s offense….So did the OLine drop 34 points and 355 yards in 2 quarters on UGA then just forget how to block the same exact guys after a 20 minute halftime break?
Or last year’s Oline that put up
24 points and 283 yards in 2 quarters in Athens also forget how to block the same guys or did Kirby just fire his guys up better at halftime or get the deer antler spray going….
Surely the schematic adjustments couldn’t have possibly had anything to do with the OLine looking incredible while dropping 600+ yards in the 1st half of both games, and then gaining a combined 94 yards in the 2nd half of those same two games……Booker/Proctor and Brailsford must have all just decided to take it easy on the Dawgs so people wouldn’t change the channel bc it was a blowout.
This post was edited on 8/3/26 at 7:45 pm
Posted on 8/3/26 at 7:18 pm to LovetheLord
That’s a very level-headed/objective perspective. Surely you are a Sunshine pumper with bright crimson glasses on j/k.
It’s hard to rationalize with most fans. They are passionate and Bama is the standard in CFB, so I understand. I just try to stay realistic and look at the roster CKD truly inherited, the tremendous job CKW has done with the defense, and what is the TRUE reason that has ultimately caused CKD’s offense to struggle at Alabama this far.
The offense has shown glimpses of how incredible it can be, like the 1st half in both Georgia games in 2024/2025 that produced 632 yards and 58 points, then get shutout both times in the 2nd half while producing a combined 94 total yards….the answer is much more more complex than saying Booker/Proctor/Brailsford played great in the 1st halves but terrible in the 2nd. They didn’t forget how to block during halftime……it’s schematics and your typical fans have a hard time seeing/understanding exactly what is happening and why it’s happening. It can be complex.
It is frustrating enough listening to the same talking heads that cover CFB repeat the same narrative constantly when they have absolutely no clue what they are talking about. It hard to fault a typical fan for buying into or believing what they hear on the radio/TV/podcast 24/7 and use the same talking points. Coaches at the collegiate level laugh at those guys and know they are absolutely clueless and are just clowns.
I’m not going to let myself get bummed out over a message board for Bama football, but I do wish we were a more rational and informed fanbase.
It’s hard to rationalize with most fans. They are passionate and Bama is the standard in CFB, so I understand. I just try to stay realistic and look at the roster CKD truly inherited, the tremendous job CKW has done with the defense, and what is the TRUE reason that has ultimately caused CKD’s offense to struggle at Alabama this far.
The offense has shown glimpses of how incredible it can be, like the 1st half in both Georgia games in 2024/2025 that produced 632 yards and 58 points, then get shutout both times in the 2nd half while producing a combined 94 total yards….the answer is much more more complex than saying Booker/Proctor/Brailsford played great in the 1st halves but terrible in the 2nd. They didn’t forget how to block during halftime……it’s schematics and your typical fans have a hard time seeing/understanding exactly what is happening and why it’s happening. It can be complex.
It is frustrating enough listening to the same talking heads that cover CFB repeat the same narrative constantly when they have absolutely no clue what they are talking about. It hard to fault a typical fan for buying into or believing what they hear on the radio/TV/podcast 24/7 and use the same talking points. Coaches at the collegiate level laugh at those guys and know they are absolutely clueless and are just clowns.
I’m not going to let myself get bummed out over a message board for Bama football, but I do wish we were a more rational and informed fanbase.
This post was edited on 8/3/26 at 10:06 pm
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:33 pm to Cover1Key
My only concern is whether we will be able to stick the ball in the end zone in a compressed field situation, say inside the 5-yard line. Bryce made a living throwing the ball for TDs in goal-line situations, but can you do that forever? Don't you need to be able to pin your ears back and beat the defense for 2.5 yards over a couple of plays?
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:51 pm to LovetheLord
They had a solid Redzone TD production even this past year. Lots of short passes to the TE, the Bunch set on 4th and goal vs OU in the Playoffs and they ran the 5yd “Spacing” concept to Brooks who got into the endzone to start the comeback.
The play calling inside the 10 and in, was actually one of the better things they did imo. No real complaints there…
Edit: just looked it up, and Bama was 24th in Redzone scoring and 20th in TD production. Also were 18th in 4th down conversions (lots of levels and spacing concepts from the 5yd line that Ty hit for TDs)
The play calling inside the 10 and in, was actually one of the better things they did imo. No real complaints there…
Edit: just looked it up, and Bama was 24th in Redzone scoring and 20th in TD production. Also were 18th in 4th down conversions (lots of levels and spacing concepts from the 5yd line that Ty hit for TDs)
This post was edited on 8/4/26 at 9:28 am
Posted on 8/3/26 at 11:10 pm to bamabenny
Honestly I can’t see the OL being worse than last year. I don’t what the frick we were doing, maybe all the OL change-ups and moving around was causing issues, but TheFilmGuy showing how they were missing routine assignments was rough
Posted on 8/3/26 at 11:41 pm to Refrigeraider
That certainly presents a challenge
This post was edited on 8/4/26 at 12:58 am
Posted on 8/3/26 at 11:54 pm to Cover1Key
There are two types of fans on this board. Those who enjoy insight and different perspectives and those who see a post that is more than three words and see nothing but Lorem ipsum.
Posted on 8/4/26 at 2:04 am to UhOhOreo
The OLine was good enough for CKD’s offense to be highly successful. 5 men cannot block 6-7 consistently. On top of that, the QB wasn’t a threat in the run game and D. Hill was the most mediocre starting RB at Bama since Ken Darby.
Still, that’s a symptom not the root of the problem. If 5 can’t block 5 or even 4, or 6 cannot block 5, then I would agree to a marginal extent, but crowded boxes, zero threat of getting beat deep, and MOF-Closed coverages strangled that offense like a Python until
It finally was crushed to death in Atlanta.
Still, that’s a symptom not the root of the problem. If 5 can’t block 5 or even 4, or 6 cannot block 5, then I would agree to a marginal extent, but crowded boxes, zero threat of getting beat deep, and MOF-Closed coverages strangled that offense like a Python until
It finally was crushed to death in Atlanta.
This post was edited on 8/4/26 at 2:06 am
Posted on 8/4/26 at 10:11 am to Cover1Key
I think the backs, Hill in this instance, get too much flack here. We were a duo run game and failing to execute duo or even get to the second level, and it was flashed on tape as early as that Georgia game.
Even in an instance where we played against three high safeties like OU, we were getting little to no holes for the backs because the line play was utter garbage in the run.
Plus we ran long-developing run plays which exacerbated the issue
Even in an instance where we played against three high safeties like OU, we were getting little to no holes for the backs because the line play was utter garbage in the run.
Plus we ran long-developing run plays which exacerbated the issue
Posted on 8/4/26 at 10:15 am to LovetheLord
Perfect example (referring to my initial response to you just above this one about Redzone/short yardage efficiency) of how CKD operates very efficiently when he doesn’t have one arm tied behind his back (his dominant arm at that).
Yes, for most pass-oriented offenses, especially CKD’s extremely aggressive 10-15 downfield throws of 30+ yards per game passing attacks that just constantly bombard with with “shot plays”(that’s what he averaged everywhere he’s been and what he wants to be able to do at Bama) do typically struggle in short yards/Goal-to-go situations, but the stats I listed in the previous post demonstrated their high efficiency in those situations.
Think of the 4th and goal “spacing” concept out of Bunch to Brooks for the TD to spark the comeback vs OU, Cuevas had 4 TD receptions from the 7 yard line or closer, and especially I would point to that 2-point conversion play vs South Carolina, as well as the triple option play from the 3 yard line on the first possession of the season where they used Rico Scott as the “pitch player” from a slot WR alignment and he was able to walk into the endzone.
There are several other examples (the Reverse to Bernard on 4th and 2 that went for 30 yards vs Vandy (I believe was the opponent but may have been against OU).
I think this demonstrates perfectly how creative CKD is offensively when he has players who.can execute the basic things he wants to do (in the passing game) offensively.
Those play designs on 4th and Goal from inside the 5yd line were NFL quality concepts out of creative formations and motion as well.
I just want to see the offense this year so badly. Like I said, this is the most I’ve looked forward to a season in a looong time.
I cannot wait to hear what the “talking heads” and “pundits, analysts, and experts” (lol) in the media have to say after Bama puts up 350 yards through the air on a regular basis with RW catching 4 balls downfield, Brooks with 2 and Morgan/Rogers for 2 more (and 1 to the RB bc that’s something they always look to create a 1-on-1 vertically vs a LB).
Will they still bash Bama for only 115 yards rushing (despite averaging 4ypc), or will 35+ points in SEC play cause them to shut their ignorant mouths?
I wonder how they are going to spin it after talking/typing/podcasting for almost an entire year straight about “Bama not able to run the football) when they are tops in the conference in ppg and top5 nationally in passing offense? I
I can’t wait to see what they “pivot” to
as the reason for the success but yet the rushing total is marginally better, after beating the drum about how Bama will never succeed until they can run the ball successfully snd consistently.
The reason why CKD “hangs his hat” on the (creative and well designed) downfield passing game is bc “chunk” plays of 30-40+ yards lead to scores as opposed to driving the ball 75 yards on 13 plays where a penalty or an overthrown pass results in a punt. If you just go 6-16 on balls thrown 30+ yards, then that’s going to (on average) lead to 4 scores that are “quick strikes” and swing momentum as well, and then 1 true Drive and a s ore off a short field, and you look up and there’s 42 points on the board.
Most good defenses (the SEC is filled with them) just do not allow you to routinely drive the ball 70 yards without there being an explosive play (or 2) of 20 yards or so. That’s why each “shot play” CKD dials up is a potential chance to setup a scoring opportunity, despite only being successful 30% of the time. That is how you score 35-40+ points on elite defenses…..big plays
What did Coach Saban preach defensively above anything else, and site in just about every post-game press conference….eliminating big plays (or “explosives” is how he referred to them). He would always list the number of “explosives” the defense allowed when they played poorly. Eliminate the big play and it makes scoring difficult at every level of football.
Yes, for most pass-oriented offenses, especially CKD’s extremely aggressive 10-15 downfield throws of 30+ yards per game passing attacks that just constantly bombard with with “shot plays”(that’s what he averaged everywhere he’s been and what he wants to be able to do at Bama) do typically struggle in short yards/Goal-to-go situations, but the stats I listed in the previous post demonstrated their high efficiency in those situations.
Think of the 4th and goal “spacing” concept out of Bunch to Brooks for the TD to spark the comeback vs OU, Cuevas had 4 TD receptions from the 7 yard line or closer, and especially I would point to that 2-point conversion play vs South Carolina, as well as the triple option play from the 3 yard line on the first possession of the season where they used Rico Scott as the “pitch player” from a slot WR alignment and he was able to walk into the endzone.
There are several other examples (the Reverse to Bernard on 4th and 2 that went for 30 yards vs Vandy (I believe was the opponent but may have been against OU).
I think this demonstrates perfectly how creative CKD is offensively when he has players who.can execute the basic things he wants to do (in the passing game) offensively.
Those play designs on 4th and Goal from inside the 5yd line were NFL quality concepts out of creative formations and motion as well.
I just want to see the offense this year so badly. Like I said, this is the most I’ve looked forward to a season in a looong time.
I cannot wait to hear what the “talking heads” and “pundits, analysts, and experts” (lol) in the media have to say after Bama puts up 350 yards through the air on a regular basis with RW catching 4 balls downfield, Brooks with 2 and Morgan/Rogers for 2 more (and 1 to the RB bc that’s something they always look to create a 1-on-1 vertically vs a LB).
Will they still bash Bama for only 115 yards rushing (despite averaging 4ypc), or will 35+ points in SEC play cause them to shut their ignorant mouths?
I wonder how they are going to spin it after talking/typing/podcasting for almost an entire year straight about “Bama not able to run the football) when they are tops in the conference in ppg and top5 nationally in passing offense? I
I can’t wait to see what they “pivot” to
as the reason for the success but yet the rushing total is marginally better, after beating the drum about how Bama will never succeed until they can run the ball successfully snd consistently.
The reason why CKD “hangs his hat” on the (creative and well designed) downfield passing game is bc “chunk” plays of 30-40+ yards lead to scores as opposed to driving the ball 75 yards on 13 plays where a penalty or an overthrown pass results in a punt. If you just go 6-16 on balls thrown 30+ yards, then that’s going to (on average) lead to 4 scores that are “quick strikes” and swing momentum as well, and then 1 true Drive and a s ore off a short field, and you look up and there’s 42 points on the board.
Most good defenses (the SEC is filled with them) just do not allow you to routinely drive the ball 70 yards without there being an explosive play (or 2) of 20 yards or so. That’s why each “shot play” CKD dials up is a potential chance to setup a scoring opportunity, despite only being successful 30% of the time. That is how you score 35-40+ points on elite defenses…..big plays
What did Coach Saban preach defensively above anything else, and site in just about every post-game press conference….eliminating big plays (or “explosives” is how he referred to them). He would always list the number of “explosives” the defense allowed when they played poorly. Eliminate the big play and it makes scoring difficult at every level of football.
Posted on 8/4/26 at 4:48 pm to Cover1Key
He would also constantly harp about the need for explosives on offense. If I recall correctly, he had a definition for explosive plays from the time he got to Alabama in 2007 and had goals for the number of them per game.
I believe 20 yards was an explosive run and 40 for a pass. Maybe it was 15 for a run.
Would you agree with the common assessment that our defense is "bend but don't break"?
I believe 20 yards was an explosive run and 40 for a pass. Maybe it was 15 for a run.
Would you agree with the common assessment that our defense is "bend but don't break"?
This post was edited on 8/4/26 at 4:50 pm
Posted on 8/4/26 at 6:37 pm to UhOhOreo
Bama did have 450 yards of offense vs OU though, and then scored 37 in Norman.
That’s what matters, not how you score but how much.
You are correct about Duo, and I also agree with you about D. Hill. But also, OU isn’t the best defense to look at and say “the Oline didn’t get a push”…..OU plays that same 3-4 Under (also “Even and Over too) that CKW has adopted and they actually had the 315lb Shade and 295lb 4-tech to run it unlike the disadvantage that CKW has dealt with by having 4-down/Even- Front personnel that were recruited to 1-gap and create penetration (all those guys thankfully got processed and Bama now has the body types that fit the scheme).
CKW, like Venables, plays with those 3 big bodies in-between the Tackles (2-gap Nose/or a Shade weak, with two 4-techs or 4i’s whose only job is to hold the A-B gaps they are aligned in, and make the ball “bounce” to the edge.
CKW also plays with a true Mike LB, but with that one exception, they (Venables too) want basically DB’s at every other position (Back 6 or even 7), that can RUN.
The Nickel/Dime/ and Weak Safety and the Rover/alley positions, and even using Hubbard at WLB in obvious D&D, and the Weak Safety are all guys like Zay Mincey, Dre Kirkpatrick Jr, Red Morgan, Brey Hubbard, Jireh Edwards on the field together bc they are big bodied DB’s that have SPEED. Josh Mac and the Seahawks do the same think with 6-7 DB’s on the field vs most all personnel groupings.
Even the WLB is a guy like J Jefferson is small for an off-ball LB but he excelled in this system bc he can run and is great in coverage.
I give all the credit in the world to CKW for making such a radical change after the debacle he had with his base 4-2-5 vs UGA and Vandy early in Year 1. Also he has done it while playing with a Dline that doesn’t fit the scheme….that’s why you saw London Simmons as a TF and Tim Keenan on the field together more and more as the season progressed.
So, OU/Bama use lots of run pressures (blitzes basically) on early downs to stop the run, so they can get 7 DBs on the field and make it miserable having to try and run to the perimeter and is obviously tougher to three against.
Obviously they are doing something right since Bama and OU have surrendered the fewest yards and points and also forced the most turnovers in the Conference over the past two seasons.
So I wouldn’t put much stock in the lack of success on “Duo” vs OU. Also, Duo reallyyyyy needs a Back with patience and suddenness/burst (not necessarily speed). I’m hoping T. Brown can be that guy for Bama this year bc he has the ability.
That’s what matters, not how you score but how much.
You are correct about Duo, and I also agree with you about D. Hill. But also, OU isn’t the best defense to look at and say “the Oline didn’t get a push”…..OU plays that same 3-4 Under (also “Even and Over too) that CKW has adopted and they actually had the 315lb Shade and 295lb 4-tech to run it unlike the disadvantage that CKW has dealt with by having 4-down/Even- Front personnel that were recruited to 1-gap and create penetration (all those guys thankfully got processed and Bama now has the body types that fit the scheme).
CKW, like Venables, plays with those 3 big bodies in-between the Tackles (2-gap Nose/or a Shade weak, with two 4-techs or 4i’s whose only job is to hold the A-B gaps they are aligned in, and make the ball “bounce” to the edge.
CKW also plays with a true Mike LB, but with that one exception, they (Venables too) want basically DB’s at every other position (Back 6 or even 7), that can RUN.
The Nickel/Dime/ and Weak Safety and the Rover/alley positions, and even using Hubbard at WLB in obvious D&D, and the Weak Safety are all guys like Zay Mincey, Dre Kirkpatrick Jr, Red Morgan, Brey Hubbard, Jireh Edwards on the field together bc they are big bodied DB’s that have SPEED. Josh Mac and the Seahawks do the same think with 6-7 DB’s on the field vs most all personnel groupings.
Even the WLB is a guy like J Jefferson is small for an off-ball LB but he excelled in this system bc he can run and is great in coverage.
I give all the credit in the world to CKW for making such a radical change after the debacle he had with his base 4-2-5 vs UGA and Vandy early in Year 1. Also he has done it while playing with a Dline that doesn’t fit the scheme….that’s why you saw London Simmons as a TF and Tim Keenan on the field together more and more as the season progressed.
So, OU/Bama use lots of run pressures (blitzes basically) on early downs to stop the run, so they can get 7 DBs on the field and make it miserable having to try and run to the perimeter and is obviously tougher to three against.
Obviously they are doing something right since Bama and OU have surrendered the fewest yards and points and also forced the most turnovers in the Conference over the past two seasons.
So I wouldn’t put much stock in the lack of success on “Duo” vs OU. Also, Duo reallyyyyy needs a Back with patience and suddenness/burst (not necessarily speed). I’m hoping T. Brown can be that guy for Bama this year bc he has the ability.
This post was edited on 8/4/26 at 7:47 pm
Posted on 8/4/26 at 6:44 pm to LovetheLord
Absolutely not. It’s the opposite.
They gave up the fewest yards a Bama Defense has limited opponents to since 2017.
They have forced more turnovers than anyone in the SEC over the past two seasons.
They held Georgia, LSU and South Carolina and OU all to their fewest yards per carry for the season.
Bama’s defense was nothing special in the Redzone (not bad but not elite). Most “bend but don’t break” defenses surrender lots of yards and stiffen in the Redzone.
Bama’s defense is as far from that as you can get. Any defense allowing just 290ypg and forcing the most turnovers in their league is certainly not doing a whole of “bending”.
What games this past year have you that impression?
Just curious
They gave up the fewest yards a Bama Defense has limited opponents to since 2017.
They have forced more turnovers than anyone in the SEC over the past two seasons.
They held Georgia, LSU and South Carolina and OU all to their fewest yards per carry for the season.
Bama’s defense was nothing special in the Redzone (not bad but not elite). Most “bend but don’t break” defenses surrender lots of yards and stiffen in the Redzone.
Bama’s defense is as far from that as you can get. Any defense allowing just 290ypg and forcing the most turnovers in their league is certainly not doing a whole of “bending”.
What games this past year have you that impression?
Just curious
This post was edited on 8/4/26 at 7:48 pm
Posted on 8/4/26 at 7:14 pm to UhOhOreo
Do yourself a favor and do NOT watch that clown. Guy has no idea what he’s talking about. I tried to sit through it a couple times bc I saw Bama fans posting about him a good bit,
It was veryyyy difficult to watch. The guy literally has no idea what he’s looking at outside of maybe showing a lineman getting beat or something anyone could recognize easily.
I remember specifically, he was bashing a perimeter screen Bama ran bc the #2 WR (not RW but the middle guy in the 3-WR set) did not block the flat defender but instead he bypassed him and worked up to the 3rd level to fit up on the Safety. He went on a loud tangent about the lack of effort and attention to detail (all the same ole cliches).
So I ran it back and watched it myself and the “flat defender” that the WR bypassed was the freaking Nickel playing into the Boundary (I’ll admit that Trips into the boundary isn’t very common) and rotated/buzzed straight to the #1 (widest) WR to eventually become the flat defender while the CB mid-pointed #1 and #2, sooooo there was no flat defender with any outside leverage and the WR he was criticizing like he had committed a homicide did EXACTLY what he was supposed to do by climbing to the next level (much like a lineman working up to a 2nd level defender on outside zone bc there is no down-tech to the PS.
It was simply a good call defensively, and Bama still had the edge but it was thrown slightly behind the #3 WR running the perimeter screen and he had to slow down briefly to catch it which allowed Malachi Starks (freak athlete) to run him down from the inside.
The he tried explaining how the pass pro was “called the wrong way” when it was a 4 man slide to the field with the BST taking the DE and the RB taking a potential B or C gap pressure (very simple and basic protection that is sound that just about any team in the country runs routinely…well both of them came (PSLB and the Nickel defender) which meant the defense brought 4 from the same side (this is rare and also unsound defensively bc you lack “gap integrity”, but UGA ran it bc it was 3rd and a mile and they obviously weren’t concerned about a handoff), and the RB took the PSLB bc he has the shortest run to the QB, and that allows the QB a chance to see the alley/wide edge pressure coming (the Nickel defender in this case), and get rid of the ball or even throw into the blitz, and “Film Guy” or whoever he is, lost his mind again like Bama is the worst coached team in America when they literally handled both plays as soundly as it gets. It wasn’t even complex. A well coached HS team could’ve handled just as well.
Watching that will have you dehydrated from raving about Bama’s lack of running game and how the offense won’t “work” until it does….before long you will sound like the SEC Network guys!
It was veryyyy difficult to watch. The guy literally has no idea what he’s looking at outside of maybe showing a lineman getting beat or something anyone could recognize easily.
I remember specifically, he was bashing a perimeter screen Bama ran bc the #2 WR (not RW but the middle guy in the 3-WR set) did not block the flat defender but instead he bypassed him and worked up to the 3rd level to fit up on the Safety. He went on a loud tangent about the lack of effort and attention to detail (all the same ole cliches).
So I ran it back and watched it myself and the “flat defender” that the WR bypassed was the freaking Nickel playing into the Boundary (I’ll admit that Trips into the boundary isn’t very common) and rotated/buzzed straight to the #1 (widest) WR to eventually become the flat defender while the CB mid-pointed #1 and #2, sooooo there was no flat defender with any outside leverage and the WR he was criticizing like he had committed a homicide did EXACTLY what he was supposed to do by climbing to the next level (much like a lineman working up to a 2nd level defender on outside zone bc there is no down-tech to the PS.
It was simply a good call defensively, and Bama still had the edge but it was thrown slightly behind the #3 WR running the perimeter screen and he had to slow down briefly to catch it which allowed Malachi Starks (freak athlete) to run him down from the inside.
The he tried explaining how the pass pro was “called the wrong way” when it was a 4 man slide to the field with the BST taking the DE and the RB taking a potential B or C gap pressure (very simple and basic protection that is sound that just about any team in the country runs routinely…well both of them came (PSLB and the Nickel defender) which meant the defense brought 4 from the same side (this is rare and also unsound defensively bc you lack “gap integrity”, but UGA ran it bc it was 3rd and a mile and they obviously weren’t concerned about a handoff), and the RB took the PSLB bc he has the shortest run to the QB, and that allows the QB a chance to see the alley/wide edge pressure coming (the Nickel defender in this case), and get rid of the ball or even throw into the blitz, and “Film Guy” or whoever he is, lost his mind again like Bama is the worst coached team in America when they literally handled both plays as soundly as it gets. It wasn’t even complex. A well coached HS team could’ve handled just as well.
Watching that will have you dehydrated from raving about Bama’s lack of running game and how the offense won’t “work” until it does….before long you will sound like the SEC Network guys!
This post was edited on 8/4/26 at 8:36 pm
Posted on 8/4/26 at 7:43 pm to Cover1Key
Whoever downvoted this, would you care to politely and respectfully converse with me, and simply explain your reason(s) for disagreeing with my post/message?
I’m genuinely curious is all. I always want to learn more, and I would appreciate you taking the time to afford me that opportunity.
My curiosity is due to the message I posted and that you disagree with etc, bc it primarily consists of statistics. You can google it to find the info yourself if you disagree.
I found that perplexing and was hoping you might be willing to elaborate.
Thanks
I’m genuinely curious is all. I always want to learn more, and I would appreciate you taking the time to afford me that opportunity.
My curiosity is due to the message I posted and that you disagree with etc, bc it primarily consists of statistics. You can google it to find the info yourself if you disagree.
I found that perplexing and was hoping you might be willing to elaborate.
Thanks
This post was edited on 8/4/26 at 7:50 pm
Posted on 8/4/26 at 8:26 pm to Cover1Key
You can't sweat downvotes in here. Watch, I will get two just because of my screen name.
As far as bend but don't break, it is just what people kept saying. They looked pretty opposite to my eyes.
As far as bend but don't break, it is just what people kept saying. They looked pretty opposite to my eyes.
Posted on 8/4/26 at 8:38 pm to LovetheLord
For sure, obviously if I’m sweating downvotes on an anonymous football message board then I’ve got much deeper issues lol.
I just wonder if they do it for giggles or if they genuinely disagree.
I wish it was the latter, bc I love talking ball with anyone and it would be interesting to hear their response.
I just wonder if they do it for giggles or if they genuinely disagree.
I wish it was the latter, bc I love talking ball with anyone and it would be interesting to hear their response.
This post was edited on 8/5/26 at 4:11 am
Posted on 8/4/26 at 9:17 pm to LovetheLord
Yes, any defense that holds opponents to 290ypg (especially when you consider that includes all 16 games and the strength of the opposition), when CNS’s defenses didn’t accomplish that since the 2017 season before Pruitt left is certainly not a “bend but don’t break” lol.
Also allowing the 4th fewest passing yards in all of CFB is also a pretty good indicator.
Then factor in the forced turnovers (scored 9 points of their own vs South Carolina, held on to a 24-21 win in Athens despite the offense getting shutout and converting 4 first downs the entire 2nd half, the Z Brown pick-6’s vs Tennessee and OU that flipped the game on its head, etc etc etc).
What game out of the 11 wins last year, would you say the offense bailed out the defense to win a game?
Like I often cite:
- Bama is 18-0 under CKD when scoring 23 points in a game*****
My theory is that Bama fans don’t give the defense and most of all CKW near the credit they deserve bc:
- All the focus is on the offense’s ineffectiveness/inconsistency
- The defense hasn’t had any “stars” like the Saban years where the defense was nothing but future All-Pro talents. It’s kind of a “no-name” defense that doesn’t have any “feared” player(s) that you associate them with.
I think that is a feather in CKW’s cap bc he is about to have some “Dudes” to work with (X Griffin, Jireh Edwards, Justin Hill, Jordan Edmonds, Ivan Taylor, Nolan Wilson, Jamarion Matthews, etc etc etc)
- The undersized DLine trying to play a 3-4 Under Front that makes them just look small when you see them on TV. They have 260lbs J Renaud playing a 4i, and 6’6 278lb K Keeley as a 5-tech and Edrik Hill at 280 trying to play a 3-tech, etc…
Yes, he would put TF London Simmons out there and ask Tim Keenan to play 40+ snaps a game when he’s supposed to play 20 at the most, in order to put some size in-between the Tackles.
Once again, I think this is a credit to CKW for producing the best/2nd best defense in the conference in both seasons, including allowing fewer points, yards and producing (far) more turnovers than Georgia’s defense.
I doubt you could’ve found a single person who follows Bama closely that would’ve believed that when he was hired.
Also allowing the 4th fewest passing yards in all of CFB is also a pretty good indicator.
Then factor in the forced turnovers (scored 9 points of their own vs South Carolina, held on to a 24-21 win in Athens despite the offense getting shutout and converting 4 first downs the entire 2nd half, the Z Brown pick-6’s vs Tennessee and OU that flipped the game on its head, etc etc etc).
What game out of the 11 wins last year, would you say the offense bailed out the defense to win a game?
Like I often cite:
- Bama is 18-0 under CKD when scoring 23 points in a game*****
My theory is that Bama fans don’t give the defense and most of all CKW near the credit they deserve bc:
- All the focus is on the offense’s ineffectiveness/inconsistency
- The defense hasn’t had any “stars” like the Saban years where the defense was nothing but future All-Pro talents. It’s kind of a “no-name” defense that doesn’t have any “feared” player(s) that you associate them with.
I think that is a feather in CKW’s cap bc he is about to have some “Dudes” to work with (X Griffin, Jireh Edwards, Justin Hill, Jordan Edmonds, Ivan Taylor, Nolan Wilson, Jamarion Matthews, etc etc etc)
- The undersized DLine trying to play a 3-4 Under Front that makes them just look small when you see them on TV. They have 260lbs J Renaud playing a 4i, and 6’6 278lb K Keeley as a 5-tech and Edrik Hill at 280 trying to play a 3-tech, etc…
Yes, he would put TF London Simmons out there and ask Tim Keenan to play 40+ snaps a game when he’s supposed to play 20 at the most, in order to put some size in-between the Tackles.
Once again, I think this is a credit to CKW for producing the best/2nd best defense in the conference in both seasons, including allowing fewer points, yards and producing (far) more turnovers than Georgia’s defense.
I doubt you could’ve found a single person who follows Bama closely that would’ve believed that when he was hired.
This post was edited on 8/4/26 at 9:57 pm
Latest Alabama News

Popular
Back to top


1





