Started By
Message

re: That was the type of loss that changes a program 1 way or another

Posted on 1/8/19 at 8:11 pm to
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Tittleman's Crest
Member since Feb 2009
52633 posts
Posted on 1/8/19 at 8:11 pm to
I don't think there necessarily needs to be a "reinvention." We had an awful game. We got our butts kicked. When you play the best teams every year, its bound to happen. It was worse than one would expect, but I don't think that this game is indicative of the future.

We've lost several first round picks on defense the past 2 years, and we had some significant injuries. There was always going to be some dropoff. We are still recruiting lights out, and we will be back next year. I am really not that concerned about the future.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 1/8/19 at 8:22 pm to
We got our arse kicked because we were lost, unprepared, unfocused and made terrible play calls against a very good team in the biggest game of the year. This was a massive failure in coaching. Complacency top to bottom
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Tittleman's Crest
Member since Feb 2009
52633 posts
Posted on 1/8/19 at 8:28 pm to
quote:


We got our arse kicked because we were lost, unprepared, unfocused and made terrible play calls


Which is incredibly uncommon for a Saban team. It was an anomaly IMO. It just seems so stark because it never happens. It was a really bad night all around, but unless that type of performance becomes a trend, then I am not going to worry too much.
Posted by Sneaky__Sally
Member since Jul 2015
12364 posts
Posted on 1/8/19 at 9:04 pm to
Ya just like in 2010 probably - its bound to happen from time to time. Learn from it, use it as a coachable moment and move forward.
Posted by crimsontater
Trenton GA
Member since Dec 2009
3732 posts
Posted on 1/8/19 at 9:28 pm to
we had young players finally looking like young players and making mistakes. we had senior veteran players whiffing on blocks, plural. we had a defense with what, 9 new starters and multiple new coaches getting exposed by a senior led offense with a probable generational qb. obviously this could go on.

however, i dont think any one coach is to blame. i fully expect this team to get back to work on 2019 and be rocking and ready to go come september.

bama flat out ran into a buzzsaw and a combination of injuries, half the 2015 recruiting class transferring out, just plain old mistake filled football, done them in.

but thru it all, ROLL TIDE ROLL
Posted by Gene Ween
Member since Dec 2018
181 posts
Posted on 1/9/19 at 7:37 am to
quote:

bama flat out ran into a buzzsaw.


Clemson wasn't a buzz saw. There was nothing extraordinary about them or their game plan and that includes their defense and trevor lawrence. Clemson simply played their game and executed very well.

Alabama didn't have an answer for trevor's deep ball and their wide receivers. Clemson didn't have an answer for Josh Jacobs out of the shotgun or our running game.

We marched on them. We moved the ball really well until we got into goal line situations where Locksley's play calling went full retard.

Our defense was survivable. The two picks was survivable. Horrible goal execution isn't.

Mike Locksley owns this loss.

Posted by BamaBoynATL
ATL
Member since Nov 2017
108 posts
Posted on 1/9/19 at 8:07 am to
I get why people are freaking out a little. Sooner or later we will come back down to earth but I don’t think it’s now. This team lost a lot. Even before injuries, the entire secondary...young linebackers...new starting QB. Tua’s brilliance covered up a lot and I think it will next year even tho the SEC will be a little better. Look if you say it will be harder because everyone around us is getting better, I agree but if you say it’s because Saban is going downward I disagree. Him and Belicheck are the best at making changes every off season to keep their team in the best position. Staff is young and changes need to be made but coach seems the same as he was 5 years ago and I trust him to get it right. We got whooped and out coached but it’s happened before (Ohio state, Auburn, Texas A&M) and we bounced back.
Posted by OldPete
Georgia
Member since Oct 2013
2804 posts
Posted on 1/9/19 at 8:13 am to
Just read an interesting article (or at least I thought so) on one reporter's take on the loss:

LINK
Posted by crimsontater
Trenton GA
Member since Dec 2009
3732 posts
Posted on 1/9/19 at 8:17 am to
Clemson didn't have an answer for Josh Jacobs out of the shotgun or our running game.


i beg to differ. every time clemson needed to rise up and shut it down, they did. if you didnt notice. by letting bama run the clock by running the ball without a major downfield passing threat, they accomplished exactly what they wanted. when bama was at the goal line, they shut it down, period! bama couldnt get 6 inches on that defense.

you see it your way, i see it mine.
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Tittleman's Crest
Member since Feb 2009
52633 posts
Posted on 1/9/19 at 8:18 am to
quote:

This team lost a lot. Even before injuries, the entire secondary...young linebackers...new starting QB.


You think people would learn after 2010, 2014. We lost so many great players the last two years, and there was absolutely going to be a significant dropoff. As good as Tua is, he has a good bit of work to do, and I have no doubt he will do it. Experience is soooo important, and was one of the big differences in the game.
Posted by My2Bits
2500 mi from Tuscaloosa due west
Member since Jun 2012
4795 posts
Posted on 1/9/19 at 8:33 am to
If you want to know if this game was a program changer or not watch how we play next season.
Do we have an inexplicable loss or losses. Do we make the Playoffs? How do we play when we get there?
The 2020 recruiting class,wont be a large class but will it have quality top to bottom?
Those are the main clues I'll look for among other signs.
Posted by BamaBoynATL
ATL
Member since Nov 2017
108 posts
Posted on 1/9/19 at 10:36 am to
Eh Idk I don’t think they were letting us run it down their throat, I think our oline is much better at run blocking than we thought (also dexter Lawrence not playing) and much weaker vs an elite pass rush.They were obviously playing the pass and Tua so near the goal line when they could focus on stopping the run they did.
Posted by Sid E Walker
InsecureU ©
Member since Nov 2013
23882 posts
Posted on 1/9/19 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

I have nothing other than my eyes to back up the following statement but I feel as though “pass first” teams become soft across the board.

Completely agree, and I also think that ‘softness’ filters over to the defense. Our front seven will still make the occasional ‘wow hit’ on a player, but past defenses with Moseley, Hightower, McClain, Upshaw, etc. made those wow hits on every single play. It’s frustrating to see what we’ve become.

We don’t play to make their arse quit any more. With the exception of Jacobs.

You know that the other SEC teams see blood in the water, and it’s imperative that we get back to a physical style of football.

Posted by stomp
Bama
Member since Nov 2014
3705 posts
Posted on 1/9/19 at 1:39 pm to
I still think these #1 recruiting classes need more scrutiny. Like a post-graduation re-ranking based on performance.

Recruiting rankings are so unclear and based on things that won't matter once a player straps the pads on.

We've recruited many more players from outside the deep south, from outside the inner cities, from outside the country boy areas...and it's started to show.

I don't think the sky is falling, but I do think there is room for a little recruiting scrutiny. Especially regarding regionality in the trenches.

2010 signees
LINK /

2016 signees
LINK /

Pay attention to who's contributing in the trenches (OL/DL/LB) on a regular basis (meaning, not injured all the time) and more importantly, pay attention to WHERE they are from.
This post was edited on 1/9/19 at 1:44 pm
Posted by Sneaky__Sally
Member since Jul 2015
12364 posts
Posted on 1/9/19 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

I still think these #1 recruiting classes need more scrutiny. Like a post-graduation re-ranking based on performance.

Recruiting rankings are so unclear and based on things that won't matter once a player straps the pads on.

We've recruited many more players from outside the deep south, from outside the inner cities, from outside the country boy areas...and it's started to show.

I don't think the sky is falling, but I do think there is room for a little recruiting scrutiny. Especially regarding regionality in the trenche


The thing is that bama missed on their evaluation some recruits talent wise / some couldn't fit in the culture and transferred out and that sort of came to a head on the defensive side of the ball this year. You also have lots and lots of talented people leaving early.

Same thing sort of happened in the 2013/2014 time frame and will probably happen again in about 5 or so years after another upswing if historical trends held up. Its always going to be cyclical, Bama can't reload on both sides every single year - luckily its only about every 4/5 years they need some reload and fresh blood type stuff.

Bama let Ezekial Elliot rush for 200+ yards and 10 yards a carry on them - I don't think the defensive performance last night was much worse than that all things considered and fully expect a similar reaction and to see a real Bama defense on the field again in the next couple years.
This post was edited on 1/9/19 at 1:57 pm
Posted by prevatt33
Member since Dec 2011
2837 posts
Posted on 1/9/19 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

We don’t play to make their arse quit any more.


quote:

it’s imperative that we get back to a physical style of football.


Does anyone in CFB currently play more physically than us? We have to remember that the RPO has radically changed the game, and offenses currently have a major advantage over defenses. Until the offensive lineman downfield is changed to 1 yard like the NFL, college defenses will continue to be on their heels. Balance mus be restored via the rules committee.
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
16456 posts
Posted on 1/9/19 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

Does anyone in CFB currently play more physically than us?


I don't think the oline was very physical at all this year. It was something that bothered me all year, how much this team struggled to pick up tough yards on the ground when required. That to me is the biggest weakness of the team this year, not being able to pummel the other team on offense when you need to
Posted by prevatt33
Member since Dec 2011
2837 posts
Posted on 1/9/19 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

You also have lots and lots of talented people leaving early.


This. Bama puts so many kids in the NFL after 3 and 4 years. Most other schools get 5 years out of these kids. Hell, on Clemson's D this year, only 1 starter is a younger than a junior. On the second team, only 4 people are younger than a junior. (RdShirt Soph and Junior are the same IMO).

How many in our defensive 2 deep are upperclassmen? A small handful?

All but 5 of Clemson's 22 players on their defensive 2 deep are upperclassmen.

https://www.ourlads.com/ncaa-football-depth-charts/depth-chart/clemson/90314

Face it. Bama is awesome, but player and coaching turnover is an issue sometimes. It's nothing to worry about. It's just part of being the best dynasty in the history of CFB.

This post was edited on 1/9/19 at 2:04 pm
Posted by phil4bama
Emerald Coast of PCB
Member since Jul 2011
11454 posts
Posted on 1/9/19 at 2:07 pm to
The thing that concerns me is we did get outcoached Monday. From top to bottom. And that falls at Coach Saban’s feet. That he allowed it to happen. Maybe it was just an aberration that will corrected but it’s disturbing. The zen master of every small detail didn’t even have the big details all in place. It makes you think. I hope it was just a fluke.
Posted by prevatt33
Member since Dec 2011
2837 posts
Posted on 1/9/19 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

The thing that concerns me is we did get outcoached Monday. From top to bottom. And that falls at Coach Saban’s feet. That he allowed it to happen. Maybe it was just an aberration that will corrected but it’s disturbing. The zen master of every small detail didn’t even have the big details all in place. It makes you think. I hope it was just a fluke.


While I agree that our defense couldn't find the adjustments in the second half like we normally do, and that our redzone play-calling was bad at times, we mostly just didn't execute well enough. Go look at our offensive production outside goal-to-go. We were moving the ball at will. Go look at our defensive production on 1st and 2nd down - it was great. We just sucked in goal-to-go situations on O and 3rd down on D (much like the OSU game in 2014).

My point is that sure, the final score was bad and it hurts. But if you look at the box score and understand our red-zone ineffieciencies, we were simply a handful of plays from being right in the shootout or even winning.

In the 10-15 or so plays in this game that really decided it, Clemson was perfect and we just missed making the play. Based on that, I'm not ready to paint the whole program with a wide brush of failure.

The reality is that we knew going into this year that the defense was going to be young and without much depth. Honestly, it's a wonder and a credit to the coaching staff that we didn't lose one or 2 of the first 14. All in all, I actually think the coaches did a hell of a job this year. Just laid a red-zone egg at the worst possible time against an opponent that started humming along when we struggled. Upperclassmen-laden teams can smell blood in the water, and Clemons was and did.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter