Started By
Message

Nick Saban details how much Alabama's collective has spent on the football roster

Posted on 6/3/26 at 10:58 am
Posted by TideSaint
Hill Country
Member since Sep 2008
84764 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 10:58 am
quote:

Former Alabama coach Nick Saban detailed how much the Crimson Tide’s collective spent every year for the past five years in a Senate committee hearing Wednesday morning about the Protect College Sports Act.

Saban, who voiced his support for the bill introduced by Sens. Ted Cruz and Maria Cantwell, said during his testimony that “my first year we had a collective at Alabama,” it spent $2.7 million. It spent $7 million the next year, he said, then had $10 million for the roster during Saban’s final season in 2023.

Saban said the collective spent $17 million a year later and $24 million in what would have been the 2025 season.


“Now you have schools that have close to $40 million rosters,” Saban said. “If we continue to do that, we’re going to lose Olympic sports, we’re going to lose non-revenue sports, we’re going to lose scholarships, and basically what’s going to happen is you’re going to have football and basketball succeed, and we’ll have club sports for everything else with no scholarships.

“That’s horrible. We can’t let that happen, and I think we have to continue to figure out ways that we can raise revenue so that we can keep all sports and all opportunities for young people intact.”

Posted by Sandkhan
Member since Jun 2009
8563 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 11:03 am to
From what I’ve heard about the bill as it’s currently written the worry is that unless they make it federal law then schools will work around with state laws that subvert the intent
Posted by TideSaint
Hill Country
Member since Sep 2008
84764 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 11:24 am to
Regardless of what the language in the bill says, it'll be challenged in court immediately by some agent representing an athlete.
Posted by Sandkhan
Member since Jun 2009
8563 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 11:28 am to
No doubt about that.
Posted by VaBamaMan
North AL
Member since Apr 2013
8321 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 11:45 am to
I dont understand why athletic departments are so insistent on sacrificing the other sports, that they will go to the state legislatures to help destroy college sports. I understand the difference in the popularity of football, and let's say rowing. But the job is manage all university sports, not solely to increase the bottom line via FB and MBB. Athletic Director is the title, not CEO.
Posted by Robot Santa
Member since Oct 2009
46366 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 12:28 pm to
Every school has a couple of non-revenue sports that the fans would revolt over being threatened, much less cut entirely, but football and men's basketball are what most of the boosters care about, and while the AD doesn't officially work for the boosters their job security is largely determined by the boosters.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter