Started By
Message
Michigan ?
Posted on 12/17/24 at 12:32 pm
Posted on 12/17/24 at 12:32 pm
Anyone know if they have lost any starters to the portal or have any opt-outs for the bowl game?
3
Posted on 12/17/24 at 12:32 pm to PBD4BAMA
The primary conversation about them is their backup QB going in the portal
Posted on 12/17/24 at 12:35 pm to PBD4BAMA
Their 2 best players declared for the draft and won’t play in the bowl game. Their TE who is also by far their leading receiver won’t play. 1 out of their 3 QBs is in the portal and is also the only running QB on the team
Posted on 12/17/24 at 2:10 pm to PBD4BAMA
At this rate we may not have a team to play them. LOL. I kid, I kid.
Posted on 12/17/24 at 4:39 pm to 1BamaRTR
Let's remember, Oklahoma had nine thousand receivers out and still whooped our arse.
Posted on 12/17/24 at 4:42 pm to harmonics
quote:
Oklahoma had nine thousand receivers out
Don't need many receivers for 68 yds receiving.
Posted on 12/17/24 at 4:44 pm to harmonics
quote:
Let's remember, Oklahoma had nine thousand receivers out and still whooped our arse.
Maybe our coaches should have made a gameplan that attacked the line of scrimmage so we could force them to rely on throwing instead of leaving three down linemen with a light box and no help to seal the edges?
Posted on 12/17/24 at 4:45 pm to harmonics
quote:
Let's remember, Oklahoma had nine thousand receivers out and still whooped our arse.
Sure but their defense was fine for the most part. Michigan has a decent defense but missing their two future top 10 picks is going to hurt bad
Losing their running QB is probably going to force them to play a more pro style attack not the veer option Vandy, USC, and OU ran
Posted on 12/17/24 at 5:12 pm to Night Vision
quote:
Don't need many receivers for 68 yds receiving
You understand my point though. People mounting confidence because the opposition is missing starters is kind of futile.
Posted on 12/17/24 at 6:19 pm to 1BamaRTR
Michigan won't have their stud RB, Donovan Edwards, either, he's opted out.
Posted on 12/17/24 at 6:22 pm to harmonics
quote:
Let's remember, Oklahoma had nine thousand receivers out and still whooped our arse.
Their offense didn't need much production.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 1:08 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
Their offense didn't need much production.
They really didn't need any production. Not hyperbole to say that with the way the game went, they could have posted zero yards and still won.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 3:26 am to CrimsonCrusade
quote:
Their offense didn't need much production.
They really didn't need any production. Not hyperbole to say that with the way the game went, they could have posted zero yards and still won.
Given that their defense outscored our offense, this is probably true.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 8:50 am to CrimsonCrusade
quote:
They really didn't need any production. Not hyperbole to say that with the way the game went, they could have posted zero yards and still won.
Yep. Our defense only really gave up 10 points. I'm not holding a touchdown on a drive that started on the 14 yard line against them.
The offense should have been easily capable of scoring more than 10 points. Unfortunately, the player running our offense on the field wasn't capable of much of anything.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 11:42 am to YStar
quote:Why is this getting downvoted?
Maybe our coaches should have made a gameplan that attacked the line of scrimmage so we could force them to rely on throwing instead of leaving three down linemen with a light box and no help to seal the edges?
Even when they completed some of the nice completions over the middle(not many) it looked sketchy. Like there was no way they could consistently do it all game.
Alabama a decade ago would have turned that offense into a complete joke by just obliterating the OL. Didn’t even need sacks or pressure probably. If we went after that QB there is no fricking way they would have done anything productive on offense.
Instead, fml it was bad
Posted on 12/18/24 at 12:09 pm to ReauxlTide222
Vandy loss - almost all of that is on the defense. Offense scored 35 points.
Tennessee (derp) loss - almost all of that is on the offense. Defense got 3 turnovers and shut them down for a half.
Oklahoma loss - maybe 60-40 offense/defense. Maybe closer to 70/30.
Tennessee (derp) loss - almost all of that is on the offense. Defense got 3 turnovers and shut them down for a half.
Oklahoma loss - maybe 60-40 offense/defense. Maybe closer to 70/30.
This post was edited on 12/18/24 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 12/18/24 at 12:19 pm to JIB
quote:
LSU loss - almost all of that is on the offense. Defense got 3 turnovers and shut them down for a half.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 12:21 pm to JIB
quote:
LSU loss - almost all of that is on the offense. Defense got 3 turnovers and shut them down for a half.
That LSU loss haunted me until my alarm clock went off. Once I woke up I remembered that we whipped their arse on their home field.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 12:50 pm to Gj4Bama
Posted on 12/18/24 at 12:57 pm to JIB
quote:Agree
Vandy loss - almost all of that is on the defense. Offense scored 35 points.
quote:95% Milroe and the OL playing like complete dogshit
Tennessee (derp) loss - almost all of that is on the offense.
quote:It was SO bad, while we controlled our season, that I have to put as much as humanly possible on the coaches here. Put the rest Milroe and the OL.
Oklahoma loss - maybe 60-40 offense/defense. Maybe closer to 70/30.
I’m significantly more annoyed by the OL these last 2 years than I am any other single player or coach.
I think it all starts and stops there.
Page 1 of 1
Latest Alabama News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News