CrimsonCrusade

quote:

---

We do all kinds of shite to try and run the ball, we play lots of different linemen, and nothing clicks. My feeling is that our OL coach needs to go. We have talented guys up there and clearly they aren’t being coached well.

---

OL, RB, and S&C coaches all need to go.

quote:

---

Saban left because of the NIL and what players were turning into. He's not going to coach again

---

I would be very surprised because none of the factors that pushed him into retirement have changed.

quote:

---

The fact that you think you must be arrested to be a man shows just how immature you still are.

---

For me, it would depend on the charge. If you're arrested for something like avenging a family member, that would obviously be manly. But if it's something like public intoxication, which I assume is what most people ITT are talking about when recalling their wild college days, there's nothing manly about it. Sorority girls are drunk in public at least three days a week so obviously it doesn't take much masculinity to pull that off.

They're wearing black because they're going to their own funeral as Scott Cochran once said.

quote:

---

No, it really hasn’t. Not only are you missing the safety in the UT game, you’re giving full credit for 2 TDs where the defense gave the offense the ball on the other side of the 50yd line (both with 40yd or less to go to the end zone…it’s what won the game in the SC game). You’re also missing the offense giving the other team short fields (particularly the fumble out of halftime in the Miz game that almost cost us the game).

---

Alright, so 28 instead of 30 in the Tennessee game - that's still more than 22, which was the point of my message.

Your other two points are less relevant. What are we supposed to do, take away points unless the offense drives the length of the field? It's not like the two short fields you mention set the offense up with a first and goal from the one. They still had to move the ball to score. The point about giving the other team short fields doesn't really have anything to do with how much the offense scores. Seems like a reach.

Your post would make sense if my argument was that the offense has been playing at an elite level. Instead, I explicitly state that the offense can do more. My post was pointing out that LSU's offense is even worse.

In 2010, basically every opponent had a literal bye before Alabama and the conference rules had to be changed to prevent that. I guess the workaround is to take a figurative bye before Alabama, although 5 literal byes still seems unfair.

quote:

---

LSU will fight Alabama tooth and nail. If Bama wins it will be ugly. The offense has not scored much the last three weeks.

---

The last three games the offense has scored 27, 30, and 22. LSU's offense has only gotten past 22 points three times this season - 56 against Southeastern Louisiana, 24 against Vanderbilt, and 23 against A&M (16 before A&M had all its backups in). I'm not disagreeing that the offense can do more, but LSU is a good team to play if you're not scoring much.

quote:

---

Eh we ran the ball way better against Vandy and Missouri then we did against UGA

---

I certainly wouldn't call it way better.

Georgia - 117 yards on 38 attempts, 3.1 YPC
Vanderbilt - 146 yards on 38 attempts, 3.8 YPC
Missouri - 125 yards on 44 attempts, 2.8 YPC

The Vanderbilt one only looks marginally better because of the 28 yard touchdown with the game decided and a minute to play. There's no getting around that the running game has just been horrendous all year.

quote:

---

No need to be an arse. I was fairly sober and couldn’t tell you the snap breakdown at RT yesterday. I saw Carroll out there some but I’ve given up tracking that because sometimes it changes play to play

---

He's not even right anyway. Formby wasn't replaced, they've just been rotating different groups at RG and RT all season and that continued last night. Formby was in on the last two drives, so it's not like they just benched him.

That guy is always like this. He spent two years glazing Milroe and calling anyone who questioned Milroe a racist with low football IQ. Then when it became impossible to ignore Milroe's deficiencies over his one passing touchdown to eleven turnovers run in his last three games, the guy comes on here and refuses to acknowledge his post history existed. Didn't even have the guts to eat crow.

It's the same in this thread. Insults you by calling you a drunk and then acts holier than thou about being insulted himself. His take is "he was getting whipped" and then he says no one else is breaking down the game like him, they're just insulting players. As though that statement doesn't insult Formby and is some sort of groundbreaking analysis.

It's always this passive-aggressive garbage accusing you of what he himself is doing. He's either trolling or just retarded, but in either case the best choice is just scrolling past.

quote:

---

Teams that bail on the run because their QB is really good, generally find out soon that it's hard to turn back and have any confidence in running at all when you need it and they go the route of all these other pretenders.

---

I agree with this but does Alabama have any confidence running the ball? Most short yardage situations you see them have to get creative to pick up a yard.