Started By
Message
Is it possible Mack Wilson left because he had no confidence in Golding?
Posted on 11/10/19 at 12:33 pm
Posted on 11/10/19 at 12:33 pm
Mack played for Pruitt who is one of the best DCs and his play dipped precipitously under Golding. Since we all have a better view of Golding's body of work as DC, I think Mack was between a rock and a hard place and made the best decision for him instead of staying under a DC who is learning on the job.
8
Posted on 11/10/19 at 12:33 pm to Shaft Williams
I think Mac was playing Mac
Posted on 11/10/19 at 12:35 pm to Legba007
Mack looked good in the national championship game against UGA yet he sucks the next season? Nah that was coaching.
Posted on 11/10/19 at 12:37 pm to Shaft Williams
I can imagine what the former players are saying about the current DC as they know well the talent that's on the defense.
Posted on 11/10/19 at 12:37 pm to Legba007
Mack cared more about Mack and getting to the NFL
Posted on 11/10/19 at 12:38 pm to GAFF
quote:
Mack cared more about Mack and getting to the NFL
Nothing's wrong with that. Mack would be a fool to stay and languish under inept coaching.
Posted on 11/10/19 at 12:39 pm to Shaft Williams
Mack was gone no matter what, his family/camp either had or were fed delusions of grandeur.
But I get this is just another shite on *insert coach here* thread that is gonna be on this board for a while.
But I get this is just another shite on *insert coach here* thread that is gonna be on this board for a while.
Posted on 11/10/19 at 12:41 pm to MagillaGuerilla
Mack's camp likely saw what's plain as day now. No need in staying under a DC who is being outclassed.
Posted on 11/10/19 at 12:53 pm to Shaft Williams
That's certainly the narrative that conveniently aligns with your point.
Posted on 11/10/19 at 12:56 pm to MagillaGuerilla
Players talk strategy too and they typically know their own abilities very well. It's inevitable Mack saw the drop off in coaching going from Pruitt to Golding. No need to stay for that.
Posted on 11/10/19 at 12:59 pm to MagillaGuerilla
quote:
That's certainly the narrative that conveniently aligns with your point.
Posted on 11/10/19 at 2:01 pm to Shaft Williams
Why would anyone waste time wondering what Mack Wilson might or might not have done? We're not talking about Hightower or Moseley or Ragland or Foster here. Wilson blew more than his share of assignments during his time here.
Posted on 11/10/19 at 2:05 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:
Why would anyone waste time wondering what Mack Wilson might or might not have done? We're not talking about Hightower or Moseley or Ragland or Foster here. Wilson blew more than his share of assignments during his time here.
You made my point. Look at the DCs those guys played for and look at Mack's play under Pruitt and Golding/Lupoi. And, now Mack is an NFL starter. No way Mack just sucked once Golding took over. Golding is the problem.
This post was edited on 11/10/19 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 11/10/19 at 2:11 pm to Shaft Williams
I've always thought we should have hired a veteran DC.
The fact that Saban paid Lupoi $1.1M last year...30% more than Venables made in his 8th year at Clemson...would be comical is it wasn't our team we're talking about.
The fact that Saban paid Lupoi $1.1M last year...30% more than Venables made in his 8th year at Clemson...would be comical is it wasn't our team we're talking about.
Posted on 11/10/19 at 2:13 pm to BamaGradinTn
I understand paying Lupoi that much. Recruiting.
Posted on 11/10/19 at 2:17 pm to Shaft Williams
What I don't understand is not calling out piss poor coaching but wanting to dog the players especially when I highlight a player who has sucked only under one particular coach. Mack Wilson balled before and after Golding but Mack is the problem? That's nonsensical.
Posted on 11/10/19 at 2:23 pm to Shaft Williams
quote:
Mack played for Pruitt who is one of the best DCs and his play dipped precipitously under Golding. Since we all have a better view of Golding's body of work as DC, I think Mack was between a rock and a hard place and made the best decision for him instead of staying under a DC who is learning on the job.
This is one of the bigger reaches of the day.
Posted on 11/10/19 at 2:25 pm to prevatt33b
Maybe I'm reaching but it's peculiar to me how Mack's play dipped only under Golding
Posted on 11/10/19 at 2:31 pm to Shaft Williams
quote:
Mack Wilson balled before and after Golding but Mack is the problem? That's nonsensical.
Coincidentally the year he sucked, he saw much more playing time than the previous 2 seasons. Easier being #2 in a rotation than a full blown starter.
Posted on 11/10/19 at 2:32 pm to Shaft Williams
Mack left because Mack was focused solely on Mack.
Page 1 of 2
Latest Alabama News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News