Started By
Message

re: Everyone Take a Deep Breath

Posted on 12/17/24 at 12:29 pm to
Posted by JoylessMurderball
Member since Sep 2024
189 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Yeah, the only pic I saw circulated was definitely of Chapman.


I thought so.
Posted by cdur86
Member since Jan 2014
1607 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

It's your money you can do what you want with it. As long as you're prepared to slide back to the mediocrity we experienced in the late 90's early 2000's if all our alumnus decide to do the same thing. Because other schools are going to continue to drop bags and the NCAA can't do a single thing about it.


I grew up in the 90's and went to school when Shula was the coach. Believe me I can handle it. I will just find something else to do. I'm getting to the age where I'm done allowing 18-22 year olds dictate my mood 4 months a year
Posted by Bham4Tide
In a Van down by the River
Member since Feb 2011
24156 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 12:35 pm to
The issue is there is no sheriff, nor will there be unless the schools/conferences all agree to a system that is fair for all.

Right now, many see it as a way to level the field - why would they (the Indiana’s and Colorado’s of the world) stop? Now they can openly buy players (or get them to transfer for money) without any recourse.

As long as they have success on the field, it won’t matter. When the success faulters, that’s when the money stops flowing and they will be bitching like we are.

I just don’t see it happening anytime soon.

Coach Saban, like always, saw all this shite and bailed. Smartest man on the planet has always been steps ahead of everyone.
This post was edited on 12/17/24 at 12:36 pm
Posted by CrimsonBoz
Member since Sep 2014
20048 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

so what's the end game here if big donors stop donating? Just idly watch as our talent depletes, and wait it out until we've had enough of DeBoer in a couple of years and hire the next coach hoping that its a homerun and then they'll start donating again? and if the next coach has the same problems, rinse and repeat? Seems like that isn't the best approach.



Basically. Once the donors lose faith the coach doesn’t last long. I think DeBoer has this year and that’s probably it.
Posted by FightingOkra
Member since Oct 2024
240 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

Basically. Once the donors lose faith the coach doesn’t last long. I think DeBoer has this year and that’s probably it.



And that's the most idiotic and short-sighted type of thinking that ends up turning your program into Auburn.
Posted by 1BamaRTR
In Your Head Blvd
Member since Apr 2015
24482 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

Seems like that isn't the best approach.

That's an awful approach. That's how a program becomes a has-been
Posted by CrimsonBoz
Member since Sep 2014
20048 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

I'm in a fortunate position in my life/career that I can donate funds and a few others that I know that are in a position to do so as well. We are all alumni of the University and love it deeply. However, the way this NIL/portal shite is going none of us want to donate to a bunch of kids that have it easy compared to us when we were in school and the fact that you have to pay even more every year to just keep them on the roster. That is a huge turnoff. I am donating more to the business school than to 18-22 year old kids that really don't have to go to class. That is just my opinion and I realize that is not a good business plan for the athletics but until the NCAA deals with this Wild Wild West business of college athletics none of us are going to spend a dime on the NIL



Same and this isn’t a flex but my family give a good bit and get some special treatment. With that comes a level of accountability on the school. You don’t want to see spoiled brats run your university into the ground of bad sportsmanship and the like. Winning is what it is. We all want to win. However, it’s how you win as well.
Posted by CrimsonBoz
Member since Sep 2014
20048 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

And that's the most idiotic and short-sighted type of thinking that ends up turning your program into Auburn.


You’re not wrong and I’m only saying all this so you can see inside the standard mind of a donor. Some are winning is it and some have a larger approach to this situation.
Posted by cdur86
Member since Jan 2014
1607 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

Same and this isn’t a flex but my family give a good bit and get some special treatment. With that comes a level of accountability on the school. You don’t want to see spoiled brats run your university into the ground of bad sportsmanship and the like. Winning is what it is. We all want to win. However, it’s how you win as well.


Agree 100%. Still think you need to give the coach a couple more years though before you can really know how he operates a team. He inherited this group that have no impulse control and he brought with him a few guys that seem more cerebral. Let's hope he recruits more of these type of guys going forward but it will take some time to get rid of the group that can't control themselves in the moment. We've already gotten rid of a major portion of said group. I'm excited to see what kind of person he recruits and brings in
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
8520 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

You don’t want to see spoiled brats run your university into the ground of bad sportsmanship and the like.


But how many of the bad apples were a product of just trying to keep the whole team from transferring out and keeping the recruiting class that was coming in?

Now, I don't recall DeBoer having that problem at Washington so it is yet to be determined, but just by his demeanor he doesn't seem like a coach that will tolerate much of that or any going forward. The players he had at UW seemed to genuinely like playing for him. Hopefully that translates to Bama in year two.
Posted by tattoo
Fantasy Island
Member since Oct 2017
1987 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 1:16 pm to
DeBoer is better than all 3 of those coaches who are good but overrated. He is 6-0 against them:1-0 vs KS, 2-0 vs SS, 3-0 vs DL.
Posted by CrimsonBoz
Member since Sep 2014
20048 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 1:34 pm to
Yeah, that is why I took my finger off the trigger and I’ll just let him do what he needs to do and see where it shakes out. If at the end of that, we still don’t really have a great product then it wasn’t a good fit.
Posted by TriedtosignuponceB4
Member since May 2021
257 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 1:38 pm to
I'm pretty sure that Saban gave GB the same information that he gave KD re: the locker room circumstances, etc., and the likely need to roll with unfortunate realities for the first year. So I think GB didn't hire him based on an idea that he was getting something that he wasn't.
Posted by Alfie Solomons
Alabama
Member since Aug 2020
1538 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Basically. Once the donors lose faith the coach doesn’t last long. I think DeBoer has this year and that’s probably it.


One of my favorite Saban quotes is it’s good to be optimistic, bad to be pessimistic, but best to be realistic.

The reality is Saban is gone, and in retrospect the guy you really think of when you say Saban may have already been gone for a few years. Whoever was the first guy to fill his shoes was likely to fail, there is no way to be successful with that kind of measuring stick, and it looks like that’s what will happen. CKD may be able to turn it around, but that Oklahoma game kind of tells the story to me. Hopefully Alabama can get the right long term coach in place in another hire or two. Maybe by then this whole money situation will be under control, but until then there will be lots of difficult games to get thru and some years of disappointment, like this one.



Posted by Funky Tide 8
Bayou Chico
Member since Feb 2009
55962 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

but that Oklahoma game kind of tells the story to me


Plenty of really good coaches have had wtf games in their first seasons at a new school. You can say that it was different for whatever reasons, but its really not. One or even two or three bad games in season 1 doesn't define a coach.
This post was edited on 12/17/24 at 3:11 pm
Posted by Alfie Solomons
Alabama
Member since Aug 2020
1538 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

One or even two or three bad games in season 1 doesn't define a coach.


Welp…I’m pretty sure this season has been defined by the 2 losses at Vandy and OU. And DeBoer has been defined by them as well.
Posted by FWBFLlaw
Member since Aug 2018
2533 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 3:37 pm to
Man, it is a good thing that Saban wasn't defined by his 2007 season. Otherwise, we would be toast. Or Smart, who lost to Vanderbilt and Georgia Tech his first season at UGA. Or Sark, who lost to Arkansas, Kansas, Iowa State, and West Virginia his first season. Just because a coach has head scratching loses during his first season does not equate to defining moment.
Posted by JoseyWalesTheOutlaw
In The Ham
Member since Nov 2017
12770 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 4:19 pm to
Your QB can't play that bad for 60 minutes and expect to win. The open date for OU was huge as well.
Posted by bamaguy17
Member since Jul 2022
1246 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

Man, it is a good thing that Saban wasn't defined by his 2010 season

Fixed. That’s the real travesty.
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Bayou Chico
Member since Feb 2009
55962 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

Your QB can't play that bad for 60 minutes and expect to win.


And not only did the QB play bad, the WRs were awful, catching and blocking, Oline got whooped, and our D were asleep for the first two quarters. It was a great recipe for an arse-kicking.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter