| Favorite team: | Harvard |
| Location: | Fantasy Island |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | Sage |
| Number of Posts: | 2211 |
| Registered on: | 10/4/2017 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: CFP Rankings part 2
Posted by tattoo on 11/10/26 at 9:42 pm to CrimsonBoz
It seems to be clear that the CFPC is considering SOS in a major way. This and the 24 team playoff are ways of encouraging tougher OOC scheduling and interest in the regular season.
In their minds Alabama has 4 ranked wins (UK, USC, MSU (pre Taylor injury), LSU). They also have a razor thin loss, with egregious reffing vs their #1 team. The other loss was the next week vs #7 and seriously injured (#1 player RCW, game-changing NT, shutdown corner, key center, others). It’s also important that the injuries are not season-ending, most returned by LSU, yielding a big road win.
They are sending a clear message - and IMO, the correct one. This is a welcome major development.
In light of the 24 team field, these developments help the regular season to retain much of its relevance but for different reasons than the past. Games, rivalries will lose some or much of their intrinsic importance, but will gain playoff related importance in the form of seeding. I.e., getting byes and hosting games will be of great importance going forward. This had already begun. even in the 4-team playoff format, e.g., while Bama fans certainly care about beating AU, one of the fiercest rivalries in college athletics, the 2017 loss is almost an afterthought in view of the playoffs made and the NC won that year.
Different things will be the focus, ultimately the playoffs and all related to that. It will be much more like the most popular sport in the country - the NFL, and will give hope to most of the entire country. They may have stumbled into a good thing. Some things lost, others gained.
In their minds Alabama has 4 ranked wins (UK, USC, MSU (pre Taylor injury), LSU). They also have a razor thin loss, with egregious reffing vs their #1 team. The other loss was the next week vs #7 and seriously injured (#1 player RCW, game-changing NT, shutdown corner, key center, others). It’s also important that the injuries are not season-ending, most returned by LSU, yielding a big road win.
They are sending a clear message - and IMO, the correct one. This is a welcome major development.
In light of the 24 team field, these developments help the regular season to retain much of its relevance but for different reasons than the past. Games, rivalries will lose some or much of their intrinsic importance, but will gain playoff related importance in the form of seeding. I.e., getting byes and hosting games will be of great importance going forward. This had already begun. even in the 4-team playoff format, e.g., while Bama fans certainly care about beating AU, one of the fiercest rivalries in college athletics, the 2017 loss is almost an afterthought in view of the playoffs made and the NC won that year.
Different things will be the focus, ultimately the playoffs and all related to that. It will be much more like the most popular sport in the country - the NFL, and will give hope to most of the entire country. They may have stumbled into a good thing. Some things lost, others gained.
re: Banhammer the Ballguy
Posted by tattoo on 11/9/26 at 1:35 am to SECSolomonGrundy
I said “almost”. It was just a figure of speech, didn’t mean it literally.
Just trying to convey that when you repeat the same mantra ad infinitum, you can almost turn even those who essentially agree with you against what you’re saying. That’s the irony: I agree with the guy on almost everything he says and have learned a lot from his posts. I guess i was having a bad day and just got full of hearing the same post modified for the 1000th time. He varied it up nicely after the LSU game. I probably upvoted 70% of his posts.
Just trying to convey that when you repeat the same mantra ad infinitum, you can almost turn even those who essentially agree with you against what you’re saying. That’s the irony: I agree with the guy on almost everything he says and have learned a lot from his posts. I guess i was having a bad day and just got full of hearing the same post modified for the 1000th time. He varied it up nicely after the LSU game. I probably upvoted 70% of his posts.
re: I told y’all last week we were going to win this damn game
Posted by tattoo on 11/9/26 at 12:27 am to crimsoncoded94
quote:
the coaching staff woke up
No - key players healed up. And anyone paying attention knew that Alabama was better than many of their own fans were saying and that LSU was not as good as most were saying. (Many were reading away too much into the LSU beat down of a bad AU team and BAMA’s bad loss to UT with several key players missing and the hangover from the UGA game - UGA lost to a bad AU team).. I.e., that the teams were close and the determinant would be, “how healthy were Alabama’s teturning wounded”, and which QB would play best.
Alabama had “control” of the game from the beginning, leading almost the entire game, then DOMINATED from the latter 3rd qtr on because they are mentally tougher and better coached. LSU played OK and Leavit was fine but KR was better and Alabama is a better and tougher team and program. Alabama was meaner and tougher in every key moment in the game the way most of his teams have been in any big game when they physically had a chance. It portends well for the future. DeBoer is not what many of his critics say - “soft”. And he never has been. Like all he is flawed and like a few he is learning. This is only his 5th year as a P4 coach, much less the SEC.
Some of us are so tired of you constantly posting essentially the same stuff. You obviously have an agenda. Please spare us. You are almost making us want the defense to fail just to quieten you.
I was once a fan of yours and encouraged you to continue posting, amid criticism. I’m sorry to say i have now changed my tune.
I do appreciate all of your work and ability to cogently express yourself. It’s just become too much.
I was once a fan of yours and encouraged you to continue posting, amid criticism. I’m sorry to say i have now changed my tune.
I do appreciate all of your work and ability to cogently express yourself. It’s just become too much.
re: DeBoer called the plays
Posted by tattoo on 11/8/26 at 1:50 am to theballguy
You are a charlatan, most rightly don’t believe a word you say. Who cares what you believe.
re: Days of stacking rosters are long gone.
Posted by tattoo on 11/8/26 at 1:19 am to theballguy
You are a charlatan.You can’t be as stupid as you sound.
Stats are for losers. Alabama controlled the play from start to finish, leading almost the entire game. Then when winning time arrived, they DOMINATED play the last 17 minutes of game time. Yet another impressive performance by the players and coaching staff under Kalen DeBoer. And make no mistake about it, he runs the show in his light-handed, understated way.
Alabama is fortunate to have him, even with the inevitable flaws. If they were to lose him, they would likely be in a world of hurt that could send them in a downward spiral from which it would be difficult to withdraw. Hopefully, the small but vocal critics from his own fan base who seem to be clueless about the current world of SEC and college football, don’t get their way.
9-0 after a bye in his career. 4 of the 9 are vs UGA & LSU, who also had byes. Don’t know who the other 5 are vs. This is only his 5th year as a P4 coach.
Alabama is fortunate to have him, even with the inevitable flaws. If they were to lose him, they would likely be in a world of hurt that could send them in a downward spiral from which it would be difficult to withdraw. Hopefully, the small but vocal critics from his own fan base who seem to be clueless about the current world of SEC and college football, don’t get their way.
9-0 after a bye in his career. 4 of the 9 are vs UGA & LSU, who also had byes. Don’t know who the other 5 are vs. This is only his 5th year as a P4 coach.
re: Alabama 31 @ LSU 13 Final - ABC
Posted by tattoo on 11/8/26 at 12:48 am to East Coast Band
IIRC, Alabama is 25-6-1, 80%, in BR since resuming the annual series in LF in 1964. One of the most remarkable records in American sports history. This is among many that Alabama has.
re: Alabama 31 @ LSU 13 Final - ABC
Posted by tattoo on 11/8/26 at 12:41 am to bamabonners
Oh, so you are the expert? You know when he had a bad streak? The hubris some of you have is mind blowing and you are convinced that you know. It’s embarrassing.
re: Alabama 31 @ LSU 13 Final - ABC
Posted by tattoo on 11/8/26 at 12:37 am to theballguy
Sure you care. That’s why you spend so much time on your rival’s board. You are an apparent charlatan, no one could be so persistently stupid in their assessment of a vey good college staff. You get it wasy wrong time after time.
re: Alabama 31 @ LSU 13 Final - ABC
Posted by tattoo on 11/7/26 at 3:18 pm to theballguy
You are stubborn and stupid to ignore that both Ala and UGA were sucking wind after their game. UGA lost to a pathetic AU team at HOME, Bama lost to a ranked and primed UT with a very good DL and the best NT in the country vs a backup center on the road.
re: Alabama 31 @ LSU 13 Final - ABC
Posted by tattoo on 11/7/26 at 3:02 pm to LagunaTide
They said he stepped out of bounds. I would have like to have seen a sideline replay.
re: Alabama 31 @ LSU 13 Final - ABC
Posted by tattoo on 11/7/26 at 9:46 am to theballguy
Well, you’ve covered the whole spectrum quite well: anything from a 28 point win to a 21 point loss. My guess is that it will be within that range too :-). I.e., you are just as clueless as most.
Much depends on how “back” are Ryan, Brown, Green, Delgatty, Carroll, Crowell, 70%, 80%, 100%; did Pierre heal up over the break? Are Taylor and Edwards ready to contribute a lot now, will Wommack let them; can X make a meaningful contribution; was Henry just a momentary flash, can his shortcomings be hidden for a game? Has Russell improved enough over the break? Etc.
Schemes and strategy matter, but player availability and selection matter more, IMO. If Alabama can run the ball like Grubb said, that will likely go a long way in determining the outcome.
Much depends on how “back” are Ryan, Brown, Green, Delgatty, Carroll, Crowell, 70%, 80%, 100%; did Pierre heal up over the break? Are Taylor and Edwards ready to contribute a lot now, will Wommack let them; can X make a meaningful contribution; was Henry just a momentary flash, can his shortcomings be hidden for a game? Has Russell improved enough over the break? Etc.
Schemes and strategy matter, but player availability and selection matter more, IMO. If Alabama can run the ball like Grubb said, that will likely go a long way in determining the outcome.
2 of Alabama’s best 3 defensive players were out, not counting Red Morgan. Also, their most important and best player on offense beside QB, along with the glue to the OL They were facing possibly the best DL and arguably the best nose in the country with a backup center. They were coming off a game that took a lot out of both teams. UGA lost at HOME to a rested AU. Alabama lost on the ROAD to a rested UT, salivating to beat them and whose crowd was in a frenzy. KR who has grown significantly, has not progressed in some ways as much as anticipated or hoped.
Schedule fortune is very key and the SEC office does not protect Alabama.
Please, have some understanding.
Schedule fortune is very key and the SEC office does not protect Alabama.
Please, have some understanding.
re: What's the logical path to beating LSU
Posted by tattoo on 11/1/26 at 10:11 am to Kcstills17
Having RCW and Delgatty back, if they are truly healthy, will make a big difference. Same with Green and Brown on D - 2 of the 3 best players on D - if they are fully healthy or close.
Ryan doesn’t get nearly the credit he deserves as one who distorts the opposing D. Helps the running game, as well as the passing game.
Ryan doesn’t get nearly the credit he deserves as one who distorts the opposing D. Helps the running game, as well as the passing game.
re: What's the logical path to beating LSU
Posted by tattoo on 11/1/26 at 10:03 am to RTRnFlorida
Above average? How about 31-10-1 in BR. IMO, one of the most remarkable records in American sports, 24-6-1, IIRC, since they started playing annually in 1964. (I was at that game at LF as a young boy. IIRC, Alabama won 17-9, Pat Screen seemed to convert one 3rd or 4th down after another. But not enough. Too lazy to check.)
re: Alabama Basketball 2026-27 roster tracker
Posted by tattoo on 11/1/26 at 9:21 am to Robot Santa
My experience has been dramatically different than yours, though I agree that many who profess to know the Lord fall short in this area. But that criticism has often been leveled with little acknowledgement of the sacrifices many genuine believers have made from both the US and Europe on behalf of those who “look nothing like them”. Many I know and have known over the years.
Many were gifted people who left or could have had very prestigious and lucrative careers but along with others they left such comforts to live in primitive housing or thatched huts. Always in societies totally foreign to anything they had experienced - in my experience mostly Africa and South and Central America and India. This to proclaim the simple gospel of the forgiveness of sins through Jesus Christ crucified, or in some cases to provide support to those who were more directly involved, though they also would be directly involved as any normal believer would, but it isn’t their primary role.
There have been many thousands over the last 2 or 3 centuries, especially from Great Britain, the US and Scandinavia. (Though GB is now an apostate nation and has been for decades, as well as all of Europe. We, the US, are usually about 50 years behind but are catching up quickly.)
These believers have been a wonderful expression of the true love of God. And they have been a living example that all are on universal ground, seeing that all are sinners and all in desperate need of a Savior. And He is the same Savior for all. “There is one name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved”. The context makes it clear that it is Jesus Christ. It’s the same message to a pygmy living in the dense jungles of the Congo or the King of Siam (Thailand prior to 1939), or to be perfectly clear, an Anglo Saxon President of the US.
These “people of faith” should be acknowledged too.
Frankly, though the numbers supposedly range from 45% to 65%, as those who know the Lord in the US, IMO, it’s probably closer to 2-4%, maybe on the low side, though i hope I’m wrong.
Many were gifted people who left or could have had very prestigious and lucrative careers but along with others they left such comforts to live in primitive housing or thatched huts. Always in societies totally foreign to anything they had experienced - in my experience mostly Africa and South and Central America and India. This to proclaim the simple gospel of the forgiveness of sins through Jesus Christ crucified, or in some cases to provide support to those who were more directly involved, though they also would be directly involved as any normal believer would, but it isn’t their primary role.
There have been many thousands over the last 2 or 3 centuries, especially from Great Britain, the US and Scandinavia. (Though GB is now an apostate nation and has been for decades, as well as all of Europe. We, the US, are usually about 50 years behind but are catching up quickly.)
These believers have been a wonderful expression of the true love of God. And they have been a living example that all are on universal ground, seeing that all are sinners and all in desperate need of a Savior. And He is the same Savior for all. “There is one name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved”. The context makes it clear that it is Jesus Christ. It’s the same message to a pygmy living in the dense jungles of the Congo or the King of Siam (Thailand prior to 1939), or to be perfectly clear, an Anglo Saxon President of the US.
These “people of faith” should be acknowledged too.
Frankly, though the numbers supposedly range from 45% to 65%, as those who know the Lord in the US, IMO, it’s probably closer to 2-4%, maybe on the low side, though i hope I’m wrong.
re: After seeing yesterday's results I just think this is what college football is now.
Posted by tattoo on 10/26/26 at 12:50 am to crimsoncoded94
quote:
Parity is good for the game.
It is to someone like you who is likely an AU fan. Gives you a chance to beat your Master. You haven’t won in Tuscaloosa in almost a quarter century nor in JH in this decade. So, yeah, you’re open for any change to give you hope if nothing else. But what it will gives us is generic football - can’t hardly tell one program from another. But for you that’s better than being the eternally downtrodden. “When will we win again?”
re: Why the hell did we extend DeBoer?
Posted by tattoo on 10/26/26 at 12:16 am to theballguy
It made great sense. For Alabama to go through a coaching change at this time would be devastating. This staff has proven it knows how to build a roster with less than optimal funds. It is great at evaluating offensive and defensive players and linemen as well as skill position players. It knows how to beat teams in big games vs superior personnel, having done it more than once.
Yes, the staff has shortcomings, but DeBoer has made significant changes that have proven to be beneficial. I.e., he’s not afraid to make changes and he’s usually good at it.
Only an imbecile would want to change at this time even if it were not cost prohibitive. Some of you are being jerked around by frauds who want Russell and DeBoer gone and so too have a few genuine but dull Alabama fans who do not understand the times. They are not only changing but there has already been a seismic shift. Even prime Saban or Bryant or anyone would have been far less than they had been in these days.
True fans are somewhat understanding about the loss to UT on the road but bewildered by the ineptitude. But they ignore the UGA loss to a far inferior AU team AT HOME. The Alabama/UGA game took a LOT out of BOTH teams. They expect Alabama to be immune to such vagaries. Saban and Bryant could weather such letdowns with a massive talent disparity - DeBoer can’t. CNS & CPB could motivate with the bench, CKD, et al., can do that no more or at best, are greatly restricted - the players can and will often leave. On and on… Not excuses but reasons. To pretend they don’t exist means you are not facing reality and the need to address it, which is the only possible path to overcoming.
DeBoer may not be the long term solution, but he appears to be the only viable short term solution. Hopefully, he is both.
Yes, the staff has shortcomings, but DeBoer has made significant changes that have proven to be beneficial. I.e., he’s not afraid to make changes and he’s usually good at it.
Only an imbecile would want to change at this time even if it were not cost prohibitive. Some of you are being jerked around by frauds who want Russell and DeBoer gone and so too have a few genuine but dull Alabama fans who do not understand the times. They are not only changing but there has already been a seismic shift. Even prime Saban or Bryant or anyone would have been far less than they had been in these days.
True fans are somewhat understanding about the loss to UT on the road but bewildered by the ineptitude. But they ignore the UGA loss to a far inferior AU team AT HOME. The Alabama/UGA game took a LOT out of BOTH teams. They expect Alabama to be immune to such vagaries. Saban and Bryant could weather such letdowns with a massive talent disparity - DeBoer can’t. CNS & CPB could motivate with the bench, CKD, et al., can do that no more or at best, are greatly restricted - the players can and will often leave. On and on… Not excuses but reasons. To pretend they don’t exist means you are not facing reality and the need to address it, which is the only possible path to overcoming.
DeBoer may not be the long term solution, but he appears to be the only viable short term solution. Hopefully, he is both.
re: Keelon Russell
Posted by tattoo on 10/25/26 at 11:16 pm to Ironandmind
Well clown, since you are likely a charlatan, I guess it’s understandable that you don’t know that KR was NOT the backup, Mack was. As the 3rd team qb, his focus was on the opposition offense to provide good looks for the 1st team D. In more familiar terms, KR is a RS freshman. In the spring, then fall, he didn’t even get all of the first team reps since he had to split them with AM.
And only an imbecile would say “Keelon sucks” or “Keelon Milroe”. You’re probably an LSU fan posing because Alabama has become so important to you. What is Alabama’s record in BR? Something like 33-8-1, not sure exactly. Even in your most glorious era you struggle with Alabama in big bad Death Valley. Had fun kicking ole Joe Burrow around BR, shutting him out 29-0. Or maybe it’s AU, who hasn’t won in Tuscaloosa in almost a quarter century, nor in “spooky” JH this decade. What an empty life you must have. It’s just football - means nothing in the overall scheme of life.
And only an imbecile would say “Keelon sucks” or “Keelon Milroe”. You’re probably an LSU fan posing because Alabama has become so important to you. What is Alabama’s record in BR? Something like 33-8-1, not sure exactly. Even in your most glorious era you struggle with Alabama in big bad Death Valley. Had fun kicking ole Joe Burrow around BR, shutting him out 29-0. Or maybe it’s AU, who hasn’t won in Tuscaloosa in almost a quarter century, nor in “spooky” JH this decade. What an empty life you must have. It’s just football - means nothing in the overall scheme of life.
re: The Defense just will NOT FOLD
Posted by tattoo on 10/25/26 at 7:26 pm to Ironandmind
Metz is having a nice year for a first time starter but please don’t go overboard.
Multiple defensive players are better and more important than Metz: Brown, Tompkins, Green, Pierre. Others are essentially just as good and important: Woodson, Morgan. The only starters to whom he is superior: Lee, Hubbard, Saab.
Why captain?
He would be one of the lesser missed starters because his backup is so good.
What is “that NFL look”? Square jaw, etc.? I hate to ask, but why is he such a welcome sight?
He looks like a future 4th or 5th round pick - not bad for an inside LB.
Multiple defensive players are better and more important than Metz: Brown, Tompkins, Green, Pierre. Others are essentially just as good and important: Woodson, Morgan. The only starters to whom he is superior: Lee, Hubbard, Saab.
Why captain?
He would be one of the lesser missed starters because his backup is so good.
What is “that NFL look”? Square jaw, etc.? I hate to ask, but why is he such a welcome sight?
He looks like a future 4th or 5th round pick - not bad for an inside LB.
Popular
0












