Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/19/13 at 9:59 pm to Bama Bird
I agree. It's not worth the pain plus paying for it. Not because $4 is a problem. It's the principle of the thing.
Posted on 3/19/13 at 10:04 pm to The White Lobster
quote:
I agree. It's not worth the pain plus paying for it. Not because $4 is a problem. It's the principle of the thing.
Glad I'm not the only one who felt that way.
Posted on 3/19/13 at 10:26 pm to Bama Bird
quote:
How bad is attendance, really? It looks like maybe 200 students are there.
It was so-so. It felt like a pre-SEC game. But it was expected on a Tuesday night. The food was shitty though. And just as expensive. Overall it was fun if you had nothing better to do, but still a waste of a night.
This post was edited on 3/19/13 at 10:27 pm
Posted on 3/19/13 at 10:29 pm to Bryant91092
Rooting for Stanford. SFA has a beast post player. Kid averages like 16ppg on NCAA leading 70% shooting, 9 RPG, and 2.2 BPG. Only way I'd feel comfortable playing them is if Moussa can stay in most of the game.
This post was edited on 3/19/13 at 10:31 pm
Posted on 3/19/13 at 10:33 pm to BigBird09
Does anyone know what the round 2 schedule is going to look like? It says on the bracket that it's from March 21-25.
Posted on 3/19/13 at 10:34 pm to BigBird09
I'm rooting for Stanford just because I'd rather see us play a name like Stanford than SFA. Hopefully we'll get a better turnout these next two games if we get Stanford and Maryland.
Posted on 3/19/13 at 10:35 pm to bigpapamac
Turnout will be horrible again.... during Spring Break.
Posted on 3/19/13 at 11:22 pm to Bama Bird
Too bad we can't be +12 on the boards every game. It was great getting 2nd chance points for a change.
Posted on 3/20/13 at 12:07 am to sarc
SFA missed a shot at the buzzer so we play Stanford next.
This post was edited on 3/20/13 at 10:15 am
Posted on 3/20/13 at 7:54 am to Bryant91092
quote:
Stanford next.
Posted on 3/20/13 at 5:54 pm to Chadaristic
I watched some of the game. I was impressed with Stanford's PG. Anyone know much about them though?
Posted on 3/20/13 at 6:03 pm to Bryant91092
They're very experienced in the NIT having won it last year 
Posted on 3/20/13 at 6:10 pm to bigpapamac
Only saw a couple minutes of it, but their big man with the fro played pretty well while I was watching.
Posted on 3/21/13 at 6:21 pm to BigBird09
Maryland and Denver are playing right now. NIT committee and ESPN clearly hate Alabama for giving our third round opponent two extra days of rest and preparation.
Posted on 3/21/13 at 7:19 pm to bigpapamac
Not to mention the bracket we were put in.
They could've done the same thing and given us a 2 seed though.
They could've done the same thing and given us a 2 seed though.
This post was edited on 3/21/13 at 7:21 pm
Posted on 3/21/13 at 7:38 pm to BigBird09
I like our bracket, I'm glad we have the chance for some big name schools to come in. That's probably the coolest thing about the NIT, getting home games against people like Maryland that you normally don't see. I remember a few years ago when UNC played at UAB and it was like the best thing to ever happen at Bartow Arena
Posted on 3/21/13 at 8:52 pm to bigpapamac
quote:
I like our bracket, I'm glad we have the chance for some big name schools to come in. That's probably the coolest thing about the NIT, getting home games against people like Maryland that you normally don't see. I remember a few years ago when UNC played at UAB and it was like the best thing to ever happen at Bartow Arena
:kige:
Posted on 3/22/13 at 1:00 am to BigBird09
quote:
Stanford
quote:
fro
no problem, Bama can handle the fro just like last time...
Posted on 3/22/13 at 1:44 pm to bona fide
Watching some of these games and I just can't help but thinking that regardless of all our offensive issues if we could have just been a solid rebounding team we would be in the tournament.
Page 63 of 70
Latest Alabama News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News