TheGhostofBud
| Favorite team: | Oklahoma |
| Location: | Oilton, OK |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | Telecom |
| Number of Posts: | 139 |
| Registered on: | 12/7/2021 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Josh Pate top 10 SEC HC rankings
Posted by TheGhostofBud on 6/26/26 at 8:50 pm to Gatorbait2008
quote:
will consistently get 6-9 wins
That will get you fired at OU, Bama, Florida, LSU, TexAss and Georgia. I guess some places accept mediocrity.
re: Josh Pate top 10 SEC HC rankings
Posted by TheGhostofBud on 6/26/26 at 8:49 pm to Gatorbait2008
quote:
will consistently get 6-9 wins
That will get you fired at OU, LSU, Bama, TexAss, Florida, Georgia - LOL. I guess some schools accept mediocrity.
re: Might want to rethink those Big 3 Championships
Posted by TheGhostofBud on 6/26/26 at 8:47 pm to GoGators1995
quote:
There is no "Big 3." There's football, then there's men's basketball
Now that's a statement that I can agree with!
re: Alabama Back to Pre-Saban Irrelevance – What Signs Are You Seeing?
Posted by TheGhostofBud on 6/26/26 at 8:44 pm to skrayper
I would never count Alabama out. I'm not 100% Deboer is the answer, but he hasn't failed yet. It takes time for a coach to get everything right. This year will show a lot of what he is about and capable of. If he slides backwards - then maybe he's not the guy. Those helmet schools still have a big attraction for players, add that to the NIL money the schools are spending to try and compete against those helmet schools. Undefeated seasons will be an anomaly - unless you somehow only schedule weak out of conference games and get blessed by the conference to not play a tough schedule. Kind of like Indiana this year. Sometimes luck falls on your side.
re: Was A&M always this rich?
Posted by TheGhostofBud on 6/26/26 at 8:36 pm to MizzouTrue
A&M has always had money, by the virtue of the large number of graduates and how the money is split up in Texas. Their stadium has always been ugly and still is. Everyone called them the poor Aggies because they always lost, they were delusional, but we felt sorry for them.
re: Might want to rethink those Big 3 Championships
Posted by TheGhostofBud on 6/26/26 at 8:32 pm to Soonerd78
quote:
already been thru this with other teams fans this year will be the first year OU will be able to count a full season of ticket admissions for new stadium since the previous year and where you guys are getting your numbers from only counted 2 months of tickets from new facilities.They will be in the green . Baseball holds more fans though so if they can get more to come and they will next year there isn’t a way OU baseball doesn’t out perform softball due to seating capacity capped at 4300
#1 - This is the second year, as Love's Field opened in March 2025 during the OU Invitational.
#2 - L. Dale Mitchell official capacity is 3,180, that doesn't include SRO. Official record is 5,051. Love's Field is 3,543 (plus SRO) with a record of 4,609.
2026 numbers are not available as of yet - so here's 2025:
During the 2025 season, the University of Oklahoma's baseball stadium—now known as Kimrey Family Stadium—attracted a total regular-season attendance of approximately 61,000 fans, maintaining an average of roughly 2,250 attendees across its home games.
Key Attendance Highlights from Spring 2025
Total On-Campus Attendance: 107,813
National Ranking: #1 in average attendance across NCAA softball
re: Josh Pate top 10 SEC HC rankings
Posted by TheGhostofBud on 6/26/26 at 8:12 pm to theCAW
Kirby is definitely #1 - #2 through #9 are all about the same and a tier below. They haven't done shite in the SEC. They all compete - and of course I am biased for BV, but he hasn't won the SEC Championship yet - or a Natty. Personal opinion says Drink is toward the very bottom with the coaches that haven't coached a down in the SEC.
re: Josh Pate top 10 SEC HC rankings
Posted by TheGhostofBud on 6/26/26 at 8:06 pm to KingSooner2026
quote:
I think Huepel is underrated honestly, with Knowles as DC I think they'll have a really good season and a 9-3 playoff team is not out the realm of possibility
Knowles is a great DC. Josh is awesome on the offensive side of the ball. If they can get some QB play - Tennessee will be a tough out.
re: Mike Bianco is getting an extension/raise
Posted by TheGhostofBud on 6/26/26 at 8:02 pm to SidewalkTiger
Twenty-six years in any job is a accomplishment. To spend that long as a D1 coach is outstanding. It says a lot about the guy. Congratulations to him, and I hope he gets another Natty before he retires - as long as he's not playing the Sooners again.
re: Might want to rethink those Big 3 Championships
Posted by TheGhostofBud on 6/26/26 at 7:59 pm to vidtiger23
quote:
Not realizing that they have more expenses to obtain said revenue. Meaning the profit is lower and they operated at a big loss.
I'm not sharing an opinion on revenue; I am sharing facts from recognized sources. Baseball and softball have very similar costs, while Love's field is larger than L. Dale Mitchell - therefore from a ticketing standpoint, there is more revenue. More asses in the seats means more beer/concession/merch sales.
re: Baseball Program Rankings in the Super Regional Era
Posted by TheGhostofBud on 6/26/26 at 7:53 pm to Freight Joker
Would like to see the formula, just to see the weighting. Looking at LSU and TexAss, they have both been to a ton of CWS - and brought home some hardware. It's hard to really argue your rankings a whole lot.
re: Might want to rethink those Big 3 Championships
Posted by TheGhostofBud on 6/26/26 at 7:39 pm to SidewalkTiger
I'm just asking why the baseball fans think the big 3 includes baseball in 2026.
re: Might want to rethink those Big 3 Championships
Posted by TheGhostofBud on 6/26/26 at 7:27 pm to pgaddxn
quote:
Got it. That’s what you are trying to accomplish. Sorry I got involved in this conversation. Have a great night.
Trust me conservative as all get out here but also smart enough to know that just because a young man is doing it, the sport doesn't have to be better. If the baseball players were playing softball, they would dominate (once they learned to see a rise ball). Luckily it's not that way, softball is fun to watch because it is different. I'm just saying it's number 3 now, so get over your fricking self saying Big 3 when it's not anymore.
re: Might want to rethink those Big 3 Championships
Posted by TheGhostofBud on 6/26/26 at 7:23 pm to TheGhostofBud
I'm not sure what you guys are reading, I simply used the AI search on Google, and it has links to support its statements. Obviously, data searched can be erroneous, but I doubt the New York Times, Sports Illustrated, Yahoo Sports, or ESPN documents are wrong. If the links were to Chucks Sporting Goods in Norman, I would have questioned it. I do like softball on television better than baseball, boredom sets in. If baseball were more fast paced - I would enjoy them evenly. The games are just way too long and make me want to nap. From a purely coaching standpoint, they are nearly identical. You hit the same, you field the same. Pitching is different, but the mental part of pitching is identical. Tactics are the same. As someone mentioned earlier - the softball players for the most part do look MUCH better as well. LOL
re: Might want to rethink those Big 3 Championships
Posted by TheGhostofBud on 6/26/26 at 7:11 pm to pgaddxn
quote:
What are you trying to accomplish here?
Nothing to accomplish here, I am simply pointing out that baseball is no longer more popular than softball and hasn't been for years. So, calling it part of the Big 3 is no longer correct. I actually like about all sports, so with the exception of football - none are any more important to me. I guess you could say Big 3 Men's Sports but why be sexist about it. If softball has surpassed baseball in viewership, and it has - you can't just continue to think it's more important. Networks will push what is doing better, and schools will as well. Baseball viewership has grown, and yet softball has surpassed it. It's simple math, you can't be #3 when you aren't.
re: Might want to rethink those Big 3 Championships
Posted by TheGhostofBud on 6/26/26 at 6:50 pm to Oklahomey
quote:
It’ll always be part of the Big Three.
I don't think so, it's losing appeal. That's kind of like saying football will always be on top. I hope so, but all of the problems it has seen as of late, along with concussion and injury problems - the sport has taken a beating. Young kids aren't playing as much, and fans are throwing in the towel. If something doesn't change - football will fall from the Big 3 as well. It might take 30 years, but it can happen. Just because you are on top today, doesn't guarantee tomorrow.
re: Might want to rethink those Big 3 Championships
Posted by TheGhostofBud on 6/26/26 at 6:40 pm to vidtiger23
quote:
Curious how you came to the “softball makes more money than baseball” for Oklahoma. Did not look much into it, but a quick google search said the softball program operates at a larger deficit.
Also - a quick Google search:
Here is how the softball financials compare to other Sooner programs:
Softball: Generates a strong annual profit (bringing in around $1.67 million). It remains one of the few athletic programs at OU to operate in the black.
Other Programs: By comparison, Men's Basketball operated with a $4.1 million deficit, and Women's Basketball ran a $5.6 million deficit.
The financial performance of Oklahoma softball is vastly superior to Sooner baseball, creating a rare dynamic where the women's program heavily outperforms the men's program on the balance sheet.While OU softball generates a strong annual profit, the OU baseball program historically operates at a multi-million dollar deficit.The financial gap between the two programs highlights several key differences:
Financial Comparison Breakdown
Profit vs. Deficit: In typical fiscal tracking, the University of Oklahoma baseball program brings in around $1.5 million in total revenue against over $4.2 million in operating expenses, resulting in a net deficit of roughly $2.7 million. Softball consistently operates in the black with annual profits exceeding $1.6 million.
Ticket Sales & Demand: Driven by the massive popularity of its dynasty and the opening of the 4,200-seat Love's Field stadium, softball generates between $1.6 million and $2.7 million in ticket sales alone. Softball is one of only three OU sports (alongside football and men's basketball) to cross the million-dollar ticket revenue milestone. Baseball ticket revenue tracks significantly lower.
re: Might want to rethink those Big 3 Championships
Posted by TheGhostofBud on 6/26/26 at 6:37 pm to pgaddxn
quote:
PS: you misspelled “than”
Thanks for that - drives me crazy! I don't think Google is broken, but I could use CoPilot if it makes you happy - LOL
re: Might want to rethink those Big 3 Championships
Posted by TheGhostofBud on 6/26/26 at 6:35 pm to vidtiger23
quote:
Curious how you came to the “softball makes more money than baseball”
Talking about to the networks. Ratings make money - ratings are what the conferences get the cash from! Since Love's Field opened - the softball stadium holds about 1k more than L. Dale Mitchell -(including SRO - fixed seats about 450 more), not sure how many the baseball stadium will hold after renovations. So I would pretty much guarantee that since Spring of 24 softball has brought in more cash than baseball at OU.
Might want to rethink those Big 3 Championships
Posted by TheGhostofBud on 6/26/26 at 6:14 pm
I know LSU fans love baseball, but it's not widely followed. For shits and giggles I did a Google search - and got this:
The Women's College World Series (WCWS) outperformed the Men's College World Series (CWS) in television viewership in 2026. The WCWS Championship Finals averaged 2.2 million viewers and peaked at 3.0 million, while the men's CWS Finals between North Carolina and Oklahoma averaged 2.0 million viewers.
The TV viewership for the Women's College World Series (WCWS) officially eclipsed the men's College World Series (CWS) in 2015. During the championship rounds that year, softball drew an average of 1.85 million viewers, notably outperforming the baseball equivalent.The WCWS has continued to expand its lead in viewership over the CWS in recent years:
2023: The WCWS final averaged 1.7 million viewers, easily outperforming the men's CWS final.
2024: The WCWS championship series averaged a staggering 2 million viewers, pulling in massive audiences for matchups like Oklahoma vs. Texas.
2025: The WCWS set new all-time highs, averaging 1.6 million viewers across all games (up 20% from 2024).
2026: The WCWS finals (Texas vs. Texas Tech) hit another all-time high of 2.5 million for Game 2, far surpassing the 2026 men's CWS Game 3 viewership of 2 million.
You want to talk about OU and those softball championships, but they make more money than baseball. Softball is more popular, and I think baseball purists might be offended, but the rules need to change to make the game faster. It's boring as frick!
The Women's College World Series (WCWS) outperformed the Men's College World Series (CWS) in television viewership in 2026. The WCWS Championship Finals averaged 2.2 million viewers and peaked at 3.0 million, while the men's CWS Finals between North Carolina and Oklahoma averaged 2.0 million viewers.
The TV viewership for the Women's College World Series (WCWS) officially eclipsed the men's College World Series (CWS) in 2015. During the championship rounds that year, softball drew an average of 1.85 million viewers, notably outperforming the baseball equivalent.The WCWS has continued to expand its lead in viewership over the CWS in recent years:
2023: The WCWS final averaged 1.7 million viewers, easily outperforming the men's CWS final.
2024: The WCWS championship series averaged a staggering 2 million viewers, pulling in massive audiences for matchups like Oklahoma vs. Texas.
2025: The WCWS set new all-time highs, averaging 1.6 million viewers across all games (up 20% from 2024).
2026: The WCWS finals (Texas vs. Texas Tech) hit another all-time high of 2.5 million for Game 2, far surpassing the 2026 men's CWS Game 3 viewership of 2 million.
You want to talk about OU and those softball championships, but they make more money than baseball. Softball is more popular, and I think baseball purists might be offended, but the rules need to change to make the game faster. It's boring as frick!
re: Now that it’s all over, check in if your school won at least one team natty this year.
Posted by TheGhostofBud on 6/24/26 at 12:01 am to AggieArchitect2004
quote:
Softball? Are they even women?
You obviously haven't watched softball since the late 80's.
Popular
2












