EulerRules

It’s an unacceptable performance by the offense. To be kept under 50 points and 600 yds Total Offense? The rant will not allow anything other than perfect play calls, perfect execution, and a TD on every offensive snap.
Wait until our defense collapses and gives up more than 54 yards and more than one first down in the first half of a game.
I am DONE with this team!
((Did I get it close??))

quote:

---

EWE was the Man

---

EWE = EWW! :lol:

quote:

---

If they push this as a civil rights issue,

---

I mentioned this in a prior post right after the SEC changed its rules to prohibit Wright and Harris from being "eligible' to play in the SEC AFTER they had filed suit against the NCAA. The rule specifically affected these two. I am not a lawyer and don't understand if there is any illegal discrimination that occurred. I would appreciate anyone with legal expertise addressing this. Thanks.

quote:

---

The SEC always had the power and LSU could never roster those 2 players

---

If the "SEC always had the power" and "LSU could never roster those 2 players", then why did the SEC vote in a new rule on Aug 25, 2026, six days after the players filed suit against the NCAA for eligibility, that specifically then made the 2 players ineligible to play in the SEC? It appears the SEC felt it did not have the power to prevent LSU from rostering those 2 players, otherwise, why the passage of the new rule AFTER the players filed suit against the NCAA?
After that vote the players' lawsuit was amended to include the SEC as defendants.

quote:

---

Collusion is nothing compared to antitrust, civil rico, and intentional interference with contract and not a defense to that either.

---

I am not a lawyer and did not sleep at a Holiday Inn Express last night, but I don't see anything remotely pointing to "collusion" against the SEC by LSU, Kiffin, et al. So what is the real legal reason (if any) behind the SEC's lawsuit?

Timing is very important in proving "collusion."
On August 19, 2026 dozens of players filed suit against the NCAA in Baton Rouge in an attempt to get another year of eligibility.
On August 25, 2026 the SEC passed a NEW rule barring SEC schools from rostering any athlete who signed a professional contract, appeared on a professional roster (such as the NFL, NBA, G League, or WNBA), or failed to properly withdraw after entering a professional draft.
SUBSEQUENT to the SEC rule change, certain plaintiffs (such as Dae'Quan Wright and Zxavian Harris) amended their complaints to name the SEC as a co-defendant just before or during the high-stakes preliminary injunction hearing on September 3.
Do you think, after the SEC vote on Aug 25th, that Lane Kiffin called Tony Clayton, the defendants' attorney and "colluded", saying, "Tony, I realize you went to law school, but in light of the SEC's new rule on rosters, don't you think you should add the SEC to these two players complaint"...
or maybe, JUST MAYBE, it was solely the idea of their attorneys?
Does this appear to be collusion by LSU, Kiffin, et al, against the SEC?

That and the defensive PI call that followed soon after, IIRC.

Bregs going 5 for 5?

Puerto Rico is already a part of the USA. Did you mean Canada??

There’s your typical Clemson
That’s no poetic gem, son
That pathetic limn
Should cost him a limb.
We’ll never act like dem, son.