re: i keep hearing about penalties Georgia should have gotten the other night.

Where is the indisputable evidence he lead with crown of helmet and made contact?

Have never seen an angle that shows the initial contact being made with crown of helmet.

quote:

---

Where is the indisputable evidence he lead with crown of helmet and made contact?

---

There is none and you cannot infer that it was from the replay shot from behind the play.

quote:

---

That was your 2nd drive of the game. DB got hurt there and didn't play again so the ejection wouldn't have changed anything. You got several first downs and kept driving after that before turning it over on downs when you couldn't pick up a 3rd and 1 or a 4th and 1, so no I still say it wouldn't have changed anything. And if you want to whine about other calls that weren't made, there's also this one:

---

We would have been 15 yards further down the field with a first down. That means a lot. Momentum and play calling different.


Bottom, line, your big bitch is the refs didn’t call targeting on a crucial play of the game in the A gap in a scrum while your QB ran upright. He wasn’t getting the first down, so you needed a call that is not going to happen to bail you out. The refs on the field didn’t call it and the booth isn’t gonna over rule a play in the A gap in a scrum. Clear evidence has been shown that other, more clear and egregious targeting calls were also not called, so it’s odd your expectations are they should have called a less evident call to bail you out… the refs let holding by both teams go. They let targeting go. They missed some PIs, like when 16 had one of your targeters beat on a post and he grabbed him slowing him down. They also called some PIs.
The refs missed plenty of calls and made a few bad ones. For both teams. Yet, the refs still bailed you out in OT and you couldn’t put it in from the 1. All this goes away if you can run 1 yard against UGA. 1 yard.
You couldn’t get 1 yard against the team you feel like you dominated when you really needed to. 1 yard away. That has to sting.

Question to moderator. 3 pages of this from an obvious troll. It was my understanding that if you want to troll you take it to the rant, but being admitted into a teams forum was a privilege and you show respect as you are a guest. What gives with this? Am I mistaken?

quote:

---

Literally everybody else that has anything to do with football, college or pro, says it's targeting.

---

Without evidence? I doubt everyone else is as dumb as you claim. The only obvious missed targeting calls with evidence helped your team.

quote:

---

And yes there have been plenty of times targeting has been called when there isn't a clear front facing video view.

---

No. That’s not how the rule works at all. Video confirmation is required.

GT1 Likely chorlting * back on the Tech page how he showed us over here.

quote:

---

Bottom, line, your big bitch is the refs didn’t call targeting on a crucial play of the game in the A gap in a scrum while your QB ran upright. He wasn’t getting the first down, so you needed a call that is not going to happen to bail you out. The refs on the field didn’t call it and the booth isn’t gonna over rule a play in the A gap in a scrum. Clear evidence has been shown that other, more clear and egregious targeting calls were also not called, so it’s odd your expectations are they should have called a less evident call to bail you out… the refs let holding by both teams go. They let targeting go. They missed some PIs, like when 16 had one of your targeters beat on a post and he grabbed him slowing him down. They also called some PIs.
The refs missed plenty of calls and made a few bad ones. For both teams. Yet, the refs still bailed you out in OT and you couldn’t put it in from the 1. All this goes away if you can run 1 yard against UGA. 1 yard.
You couldn’t get 1 yard against the team you feel like you dominated when you really needed to. 1 yard away. That has to sting.

---

I already mentioned before, he wasn't "in a scrum." Sure he ran up the middle but Jackson came from the edge and launched. That's not 2 guys meeting in the hole. Also, King had the 1st down if he held on so you're wrong there too. It's like you didn't even watch the game. Go back and watch where the line judge from the right walks in with his hand up to spot the ball he didn't see the fumble and was marking Kings forward progress which would have given the 1st down. You're damn right I'm pissed that we couldn't get a 1 yard when we needed it, I blame a lot on OT play calling where I think we made some pretty bad calls and had better opportunites to win it on the edge, but the whole point of the matter is it shouldn't have ever even made it to that. Without that call you are all licking your wounds wondering how the hell GT outplayed you all night. Instead you get a gift on a no call and it's all about your team's "resiliency." At least one of you had the decency to admit you were gifted a no call there and that you wouldn't have won the game without it.

quote:

---

I'm out of here after this just was dropping by to show you the proof.

---

Can't help yourself can you.

quote:

---

Without that call you are all licking your wounds

---

They got the call right on that play, so we would be whining about the refs if the refs fricked it up. We got lucky they didn’t frick it up. I expected them to get it wrong.