Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/21/16 at 3:47 pm to Projectpat
We really, really need to win out. Our remaining schedule is a joke. 3 dumpster fire teams and Vanderbilt, a solid but far from great team, at home.
Kentucky is not very healthy in its front court and they have to play @Vanderbilt and @Florida they'll likely lose another game and we could tie for the conference title.
Kentucky is not very healthy in its front court and they have to play @Vanderbilt and @Florida they'll likely lose another game and we could tie for the conference title.
Posted on 2/21/16 at 4:18 pm to Ash'sProstheticHand
So are we 1 game behind UK now? And if they lose a game are we sole champs due to head to head?
Posted on 2/21/16 at 4:25 pm to Old Sarge
The SEC will recognize Co champs. Where head to head comes into play is SECT seeding
Posted on 2/21/16 at 4:27 pm to WestCoastAg
So if they drop one and we win out we will be co-champs? What if their loss is to SC? Can there be 3 co-champs?
Posted on 2/21/16 at 4:34 pm to Old Sarge
quote:as long as I understand it correctly
So if they drop one and we win out we will be co-champs?
quote:as I understand it, it shouldn't mess with us being Co champ but would make the SECT seeding complicated
What if their loss is to SC?
quote:I believe so.
Can there be 3 co-champs?
Posted on 2/21/16 at 5:14 pm to finestfirst79
It can be 14 team co champs if everyone is .500.
Posted on 2/22/16 at 1:07 pm to Farmer1906
Ags back in both polls at #21
We're 4-0 versus the current top 25 (Kentucky, Iowa St, Baylor, Texas)
We're 4-0 versus the current top 25 (Kentucky, Iowa St, Baylor, Texas)
This post was edited on 2/22/16 at 1:09 pm
Posted on 2/22/16 at 1:16 pm to Projectpat
I didn't get a chance to watch the UK game (though I've read the game summary). But it's nice to see we actually could come back and win the SEC despite the really bad spell. Happy to see they didn't just fold when they could have.
Posted on 2/22/16 at 1:30 pm to tmc94
quote:
But it's nice to see we actually could come back and win the SEC despite the really bad spell. Happy to see they didn't just fold when they could have
Looking at the schedule of the top 4 in conference: (current standings based upon tiebreakers. LSU is 0-1 vs. Florida, we are 1-0)
Kentucky 10-4: Remaining schedule vs. Alabama (W), at Vanderbilt (Tossup), at Florida (Tossup), vs. LSU (W)
The reason I consider those two game tossups is because Kentucky is horribly depleted in the front court with Willis' injury. Vanderbilt presents unique matchup problems especially on their strange home court.
South Carolina 9-5: Remaining schedule vs. Tennessee (W), at Mississippi State (Tossup), vs. UGA (W), at Arkansas (L)
I consider the Mississippi State game a tossup because South Carolina lost to a HORRIBLE Missouri team on the road without one of their best players.
Texas A&M 9-5: Remaining schedule vs. Mississippi State (W), at Missouri (W), at Auburn (W), vs. Vanderbilt (W)
Any loss out of the next four undoes any positives from the Kentucky win.
LSU 9-5: Remaining schedule at Arkansas (L), vs. Florida (Tossup), vs. Missouri (W), at Kentucky (L)
LSU is falling apart, especially with Hornsby gone.
As long as A&M takes care of business, we need Kentucky to lose one to share/win the SEC regular season title.
Posted on 2/22/16 at 4:45 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
As long as A&M takes care of business, we need Kentucky to lose one to share/win the SEC regular season title.
just for clarity, in that case, is it in fact a co-champ? The only difference being we'd get the #1 seed in SEC tourney, right?
Posted on 2/22/16 at 4:59 pm to tmc94
quote:
ust for clarity, in that case, is it in fact a co-champ? The only difference being we'd get the #1 seed in SEC tourney, right?
Co-Champions if the record is the same. Tiebreaker is when seeding is determined.
Posted on 2/22/16 at 5:15 pm to tmc94
quote:I guess it would depend on what happens with USCe for SECT seeding. But yea, a kentucky loss and us winning out will get us Co Champs
The only difference being we'd get the #1 seed in SEC tourney, right?
Posted on 2/22/16 at 5:48 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
I guess it would depend on what happens with USCe for SECT seeding.
It's more than that.
South Carolina wins every 3-way head to head between A&M, SC, and Kentucky due to records vs. Vanderbilt, LSU, and Florida.
For A&M to have the #1 seed in the tournament, they must win out and have Kentucky AND South Carolina lose.
Posted on 2/22/16 at 10:04 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
We beat Kentucky after looking to be dead in the water 1 week ago.
:cheers-erbody:
:cheers-erbody:
Posted on 2/22/16 at 11:06 pm to SafetySam
SAMs got style 
Posted on 2/23/16 at 12:16 pm to Old Sarge
Report: A&M, Kennedy working on new deal
quote:
In an interview with the Dallas Morning News, new Texas A&M athletic director Scott Woodward said that the University and Kennedy were working on a new deal that would keep him in Aggieland.
"We will be," Woodward told the paper when asked if talks of a new contract were underway. "And I've assured coach Kennedy that we want him here and we have strong feelings to keep him here. And I think there will be something forthcoming in the near future."
Posted on 2/23/16 at 12:36 pm to Projectpat
I knew he'd be back for another few years with the season we're having, but it still hurts a little to read it.
Posted on 2/23/16 at 12:47 pm to Ash'sProstheticHand
As long as there is little or no buyout and NO GUARANTEED CONTRACT.
Page 107 of 160
Latest Texas A&M News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News