Started By
Message
re: Steven Parker article, and you're gonna want to see this
Posted on 2/7/14 at 4:27 pm to Roger Klarvin
Posted on 2/7/14 at 4:27 pm to Roger Klarvin
I wish I was around for that 
Posted on 2/7/14 at 4:46 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
The Rivalries war with Chip Brown during realignment was awesome.
That was awesome!
Posted on 2/7/14 at 4:48 pm to cardboardboxer
Is Lauren Santecroe involved in this? And if so how?
Posted on 2/7/14 at 5:54 pm to AginAL
quote:
Is Lauren Santecroe involved in this? And if so how?
She probably agreed to atm, not a mud pie.
Posted on 2/8/14 at 5:19 am to AginAL
I've been wondering the same thing. I keep seeing Santa's name brought up in some relation to this whole thing but I'm not "premium" anywhere, so I don't know how. I know all the *other* rumors about her, but don't know how she fits in here.
Posted on 2/8/14 at 6:27 am to Cooter Davenport
I think her name came up because she was acting inappropriately with recruits as well.
Look at the pics in this thread.
Look at the pics in this thread.
Posted on 2/8/14 at 7:37 am to WhiskerBiscuitSlayer
This whole thing is so stupid. It looks like Hamm is going to be crucified for this, but breaking the story on this was not something liucci should have done, at least not with names. That's unprofessional and frankly petty. If Sumlin felt Hamm was out of line, he can take care of it himself, no need for TA to get involved at all.
Edited to keep from rustling jimmies.
Edited to keep from rustling jimmies.
This post was edited on 2/8/14 at 9:19 am
Posted on 2/8/14 at 9:03 am to cokebottleag
This shite is gonna get too heated shortly.
Anchor down.
Anchor down.
Posted on 2/8/14 at 9:19 am to WhiskerBiscuitSlayer
Edited the above post.
I still feel that way though.
I still feel that way though.
This post was edited on 2/8/14 at 9:21 am
Posted on 2/8/14 at 10:21 am to cokebottleag
Dammit why you edit? We are all adults here!!
Posted on 2/8/14 at 10:37 am to cardboardboxer
I just said that I didn't understand the level of vitriol directed at liucci. I think its in poor form, regardless of how he runs his website. getting banned from an internet forum sucks, but some people seem to take it really hard. I don't have any problem with the guy or texags. I like the community over here better, so this is where I spend more time.
Posted on 2/8/14 at 11:32 am to cokebottleag
quote:
I just said that I didn't understand the level of vitriol directed at liucci.
He bullies people because he thinks its his God-given right and seems to be accountable to no one. Bottom line is that he's a toxic individual.
I make it a point to make an example out of bullies and other toxic people.
Posted on 2/8/14 at 12:29 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
I don't hate Looch (never had any run ins with him), and I typically don't hate on TexAgs because I'm still an active poster over there and enjoy it on occasion.
I'm glad to have all y'all over here, though
I'm glad to have all y'all over here, though
Posted on 2/8/14 at 1:52 pm to TbirdSpur2010
I don't hate Looch or Hamm. I don't like them either.
I don't follow 247 a lot but I haven't cared for Hamm. Usually I like Looch's info, but he's a terrible writer and gets his panties in a wad too easily on TA and gets a free reign to ban when he gets called out.
I reserve hate for Ketch. Chip's ok (wrong a lot, but fine) but Ketch is a bad person and UT would be wise to cut any ties to anything he's involved with.
He's a cancer.
I don't follow 247 a lot but I haven't cared for Hamm. Usually I like Looch's info, but he's a terrible writer and gets his panties in a wad too easily on TA and gets a free reign to ban when he gets called out.
I reserve hate for Ketch. Chip's ok (wrong a lot, but fine) but Ketch is a bad person and UT would be wise to cut any ties to anything he's involved with.
He's a cancer.
Posted on 2/8/14 at 1:55 pm to 3nOut
quote:
I reserve hate for Ketch.
Now that, I can get behind.
As can about 32.3 other people.
After all, there's room
Posted on 2/8/14 at 2:00 pm to TbirdSpur2010
Sincerely. He is the most petty and dishonest in the business.
His blatant manipulation of stars is part of Texas problem. He'd reevaluate players after Texas commitments or leans and then Texas fans would beat their dicks about it. Players would lean elsewhere and he'd drop their stars.
I don't know if they underdeveloped their players or not, but the fact is they thought they were getting 4-5 star athletes that were really 2-3.5 and believed their own hype.
His blatant manipulation of stars is part of Texas problem. He'd reevaluate players after Texas commitments or leans and then Texas fans would beat their dicks about it. Players would lean elsewhere and he'd drop their stars.
I don't know if they underdeveloped their players or not, but the fact is they thought they were getting 4-5 star athletes that were really 2-3.5 and believed their own hype.
Posted on 2/8/14 at 3:55 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Ok, but he's a part owner on their business and has made TA a lot of money. I agree that his call out on TA of Hamm was very juvenile and shouldn't have happened. But most restaurants would ask you to leave as well if you started telling everyone at the bar just how bad you thought the kitchen hygiene was. Not sure why Internet forums are expected to be different?
Posted on 2/8/14 at 4:08 pm to cokebottleag
quote:
But most restaurants would ask you to leave as well if you started telling everyone at the bar just how bad you thought the kitchen hygiene was.
Most restaurants are shut down by the health department if enough complaints come in about their food preparation practices and they are unsanitary. Not a good analogy.
Posted on 2/8/14 at 4:26 pm to cokebottleag
I dont hate either of them, though I think both have some serious insecurities and very immature tendencies.
As others have said however, comparing then to Ketch and Bobby Burton really puts things in perspective.
As others have said however, comparing then to Ketch and Bobby Burton really puts things in perspective.
Latest Texas A&M News
Popular
Back to top



0






