Started By
Message

re: Lets Talk Politics

Posted on 8/11/15 at 1:09 pm to
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
51791 posts
Posted on 8/11/15 at 1:09 pm to
Trump has donated to the Clintons. That is all that needs to be said. Clearly any conservative knows they are evil. Trump is a breath of fresh air with his lack of PC. I'll be glad when he is gone and we cut the field to about 6.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61094 posts
Posted on 8/11/15 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

Trump has donated to the Clintons. That is all that needs to be said.


Any big time biz owner w/half a brain donates to both sides.
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
51791 posts
Posted on 8/11/15 at 1:51 pm to
Good for him as a biz owner. Now he wants to be president. A relationship with the family you're running against is not a favorable thing.
Posted by BennyAndTheInkJets
Middle of a layover
Member since Nov 2010
5811 posts
Posted on 8/15/15 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

Does that make me a liar?

In the context that McConnell is called a lying bitch, unfortunately yes (by the populus).

Listen, I get the legislative dealing process. There are so many moving parts and so many variables on a lot of different planes that go into the entire legislative process. I don't think McConnell is a lying bitch nor would I likely think the man you described is either (although I have zero information to base this on).

I don't really think politicians are actually "bad" people, as arbitrary as that terminology is. I myself don't, nor do I think anyone, has a steadfast system for determining if somebody is a "bad" person. I think Ted Cruz is a pompous a-hole that has no business affecting the legislative or executive process of the United States. I mean frick, Ted Kennedy killed a mother fricker. However, he was an amazing politician. One of the best the Senate has ever seen. He knew how to compromise and work with the other party brilliantly, and he also knew how to bully his own party in line when the time called for it.

I guess my point in this rambling incoherence is that anybody that has a rational mind and a career in politics will at some point or another be labeled a "lying bitch". It's when you get some of the other types of people that will not compromise on any issues whatsoever that are the most dangerous (e.g. some of the [current and former] tea party members in the house). It's just kind of the nature of the business, with power also comes criticism.
This post was edited on 8/15/15 at 3:26 pm
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
51791 posts
Posted on 8/15/15 at 4:43 pm to
I think me and you have a very different definition of

quote:

amazing politician


and who should be

quote:

affecting the legislative or executive process of the United States
Posted by BennyAndTheInkJets
Middle of a layover
Member since Nov 2010
5811 posts
Posted on 8/15/15 at 8:46 pm to
If you either 1) can't compromise on issues or 2) play chicken with the most glaring advantage the United States has in the global economy, then I do not believe you should have any say in the legislative, executive, or judicial process of the federal government.

Cruz did both.
This post was edited on 8/15/15 at 8:48 pm
Posted by Gunner51
Member since Aug 2015
28 posts
Posted on 8/16/15 at 1:12 pm to
im not sure how big his relationships are with anyone he donated to. people that run in those circles all know each other anyway.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61094 posts
Posted on 8/16/15 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

Good for him as a biz owner. Now he wants to be president. A relationship with the family you're running against is not a favorable thing.


thats a pretty ridiculous stance to take

big biz donates to both sides b/c it wants influence w/both sides

the entire idea that you have to be 100% conservative on everything all the time to deserve the Repub nomination is an idiotic bar to set anyway and is exactly why Obama was able to win twice.

You absolutely have to appeal the majority of the country which is in the middle and Repubs will continue to lose the Presidency if they keep up this RINO hysteria BS.


Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
51791 posts
Posted on 8/16/15 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

the entire idea that you have to be 100% conservative on everything all the time to deserve the Repub nomination is an idiotic bar to set anyway and is exactly why Obama was able to win twice.

You absolutely have to appeal the majority of the country which is in the middle and Repubs will continue to lose the Presidency if they keep up this RINO hysteria BS.


McCain and Romney were about as centered as you can get. The base stayed home. Romney won independents and still lost easily. The voting #s don't lie.

The GOP isn't winning a presidency until they can bring the base in in big #s which is going to be a real conservative. Trump isn't the guy.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61094 posts
Posted on 8/16/15 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

McCain and Romney were about as centered as you can get. The base stayed home. Romney won independents and still lost easily. The voting #s don't lie.


I didn't say independents. I said the majority of the country which is in the middle. Winning moderates who make up the bulk of both sides is the true key to winning an election.

You have to win votes from the opposing parties moderates to win and when you create a line so far right that your moderates can no longer act like true moderates you flat out aren't going win.

boiling it down to the basics

McCain killed his shot with moderates when he freaked out and tried to appeal to the base with Palin.

Romney screwed himself by being forced to argue against a healthcare plan that was essentially the same as what he did in Mass and by saying idiotic shite like corporations are people.

You ain't gonna win the moderate majority doing shite like that. It doesn't help that for whatever reason the right insists on calling Obama the most liberal President ever when that absolutely isn't true or that we have frickwads like Mitch McConnell saying the the number one goal of the party is the make Obama a one term President instead of saying their goal is to work w/him to get the country back on track.

They have done nothing to earn back the public's faith after they sold the Iraq war on horseshite intelligence and the pathetic "Why do you hate America and side with terrorists" attitude they held towards anyone who opposed going into Iraq. shite, that scare tactic is what caused Hillary to cave and vote for the war and that vote directly led to Obama beating her in the Dem primary.


The reason Trump even has any appeal instead of being dismissed like a side show is he openly thumbs his nose at the litmus test and correctly proclaims he doesnt have time for that shite. He isn't just talking about liberal talking points when he talks about his disdain for PC culture. He is also taking dead aim at the conservative PC police as well.

This post was edited on 8/16/15 at 4:37 pm
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 8/16/15 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

The GOP isn't winning a presidency until they can bring the base in in big #s which is going to be a real conservative.
The one upside to the Republicans nominating Cruz or Carson would be the death of this meme forever

EDIT: Like, there were points at which both McCain and Romney led in the polls. Clinton-Cruz would be a wire-to-wire thrashing.
This post was edited on 8/16/15 at 7:07 pm
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
51791 posts
Posted on 8/16/15 at 7:41 pm to
quote:

McCain killed his shot with moderates when he freaked out and tried to appeal to the base with Palin.



quote:

EDIT: Like, there were points at which both McCain and Romney led in the polls. Clinton-Cruz would be a wire-to-wire thrashing.



In Aug before McCain named Palin, he was down in 15 of 17 polls including one as high as 9 points. From when he named Palin and the following 2 weeks he tied or lead in 11 of 20 polls. One showed he was up 10 points in likely votes. Polls show Palin was a boost for him.
This post was edited on 8/16/15 at 7:42 pm
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
51791 posts
Posted on 8/16/15 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

Clinton-Cruz would be a wire-to-wire thrashing.


I agree. Cruz would win in a landslide. Hillary won't even get the dem nom though.
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 8/17/15 at 10:02 am to
I no longer think Clinton win the Dem nom either. There's actually traction, among the liberal media, on the e-mail scandal. That, and she's currently having real trouble with Bernie "Openly a Communist" Sanders. That's insane weakness. Crazy Uncle Joe or Al Bore will jump in at the point of maximum distress of Hillary and take the nom.

Her main problem, other than her rampant lifelong criminality, is that she's just not a likeable person. She is a vacuum of personality where Bill was Mr. Charisma. Whereas people were willing to forgive Bill anything because he seemed like their buddy, even fellow Democrats dislike Hillary on a personal level becuase she comes across as a bitter and mean old woman.
This post was edited on 8/17/15 at 10:08 am
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
62991 posts
Posted on 8/17/15 at 10:16 am to
quote:

In Aug before McCain named Palin, he was down in 15 of 17 polls including one as high as 9 points. From when he named Palin and the following 2 weeks he tied or lead in 11 of 20 polls. One showed he was up 10 points in likely votes. Polls show Palin was a boost for him.


But in the only poll that counts he lost by 7 points. So she didn't actually make them turn out in the end. I don't get how this proves your point
Posted by Tecate
Member since Nov 2012
1007 posts
Posted on 8/17/15 at 10:17 am to
Cruz won't beat anyone the Dems put up with the possible exception of Sanders. He is too extreme.

Until the far right realizes that they are a minority,the GOP won't win because the far right acts like spoiled kids when they don't get everything they want.

Reasonable people are willing to compromise in order to get some of what they want instead of standing on principle and losing it all.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34905 posts
Posted on 8/17/15 at 10:29 am to
Ok y'all gonna laugh at me, but the more I hear Trump talk policy the more I actually like him as a candidate. He comes off as practical in comparison, which probably says something about US politics.
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
51791 posts
Posted on 8/17/15 at 10:38 am to
quote:

But in the only poll that counts he lost by 7 points. So she didn't actually make them turn out in the end. I don't get how this proves your point



A VP doesn't win or lose you the nomination. Adding Palin clearly helped lost cause McCain from getting blown out even more.
Posted by Mirthomatic
Member since Feb 2013
4113 posts
Posted on 8/17/15 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Until the far right realizes that they are a minority,the GOP won't win because the far right acts like spoiled kids when they don't get everything they want.


But this is EXACTLY how the Dems conduct business, and they ram through their policies while the GOPers are falling all over themselves to compromise.

The "compromises" brokered by the GOP leadership aren't compromises at all. It's 80% of what the "far left" wants, 20% of what the mushy middle wants, and 0% of what the spending restraint/small government "far right" wants.

Cruz is no more "extreme" than is Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, or Bernie Sanders.
Posted by Tecate
Member since Nov 2012
1007 posts
Posted on 8/17/15 at 1:00 pm to
I'm really not speaking of the politicians. The far right voters don't turn out in the general election if the candidate is not conservative enough.
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 50Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter