Started By
Message
re: Roney Elam...Commits to TAMU
Posted on 8/6/14 at 2:11 pm to Duckie
Posted on 8/6/14 at 2:11 pm to Duckie
A&M's insiders on 247 and texags seem to feel like he ends up at A&M. I think that last visit may be what puts us over the edge with the new facilities being introduced. As for the rest of the corners, I think we take 3 total, with Sheffield being one who absolutely has a spot till Signing Day. I think that puts Boyd as the odd man out in terms of having a commitable offer if Hill were to commit, but I don't think we lead for Hill as of now and it doesn't look like he plans to commit any time soon.
1
Posted on 8/6/14 at 2:18 pm to Harryk15
quote:agreed
A&M's insiders on 247 and texags seem to feel like he ends up at A&M. I think that last visit may be what puts us over the edge with the new facilities being introduced.
Posted on 8/6/14 at 2:20 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
At this point, it looks like 50/50 aggie/LSU. I think we've had him on campus a couple times over the summer including last week, but no pledge was given. He still likes us but I wouldn't be surprised if ultimately he went somewhere else which would suck because even though he's a little bit of a project, for a 6'3 cornerback he could be exceptional down the road.
But it's been like that with a handful of Texas db's this summer, not just Elam.
But it's been like that with a handful of Texas db's this summer, not just Elam.
Posted on 8/6/14 at 2:23 pm to dead money
quote:
50/50 aggie/LSU
I agree, and think a lot hinges on who commits first between Elam, Boyd and Hill.
Posted on 8/6/14 at 2:35 pm to TexasAg13
just give us elam damnit 
Posted on 8/6/14 at 4:16 pm to redfieldk717
From what I read Shef, Elam, Hill, & maybe Boyd are all Aggie leans at this point. I don't think A&M will land them all. I do think A&M would take them all given the chance. I also believe that it will come down to who commits quickest. Once we few decide the other(s) may feel like its too crowded and let other schools negative recruit to the depth in this class.
Posted on 8/6/14 at 4:18 pm to Farmer1906
quote:
From what I read Shef, Elam, Hill, & maybe Boyd are all Aggie leans at this point. I don't think A&M will land them all. I do think A&M would take them all given the chance. I also believe that it will come down to who commits quickest. Once we few decide the other(s) may feel like its too crowded and let other schools negative recruit to the depth in this class.
Well here's what yall need to do: Get the ones that don't have LSU offers to commit first.
Bang, problem solved.
Posted on 8/6/14 at 4:18 pm to redfieldk717
Posted on 8/6/14 at 4:21 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
Well here's what yall need to do: Get the ones that don't have LSU offers to commit first.
Bang, problem solved.
this
Posted on 8/6/14 at 4:36 pm to redfieldk717
Which ones have LSU offers? And why on earth do they not all have offers?
Posted on 8/6/14 at 7:48 pm to Farmer1906
My guess would be that they don't have offers because they haven't camped at LSU.
Posted on 8/7/14 at 10:24 pm to Farmer1906
Boyd is the only one without an offer though I don't think Hill could commit even if he were interested. Elam has always been high in the priority list and no school turns away a kid like Sheffield.
Posted on 8/8/14 at 10:20 am to lsufanva
This entire groups of DBs recruitment is so intertwined. I just want to see the first domino fall!
Posted on 8/9/14 at 8:34 am to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:5 for 5 only came about because they were all committing on the same day. you can't just say 5/5 and throw 3 already committed players on there
Stating facts is not trolling. LSU's #5FOR5 was a failure of epic proportions.
A&M has 3 of their "5FOR5" already committed.
Posted on 8/9/14 at 9:01 am to bee Rye
For us, 5 for 5 refers to the top 5 players in the state of Texas.
Posted on 8/9/14 at 9:47 am to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:then I guess y'all are just cherry picking which recruiting service fits you agenda the best then, because according to this board, the 247 composite is the standard, and at the moment, you have 2/5 with #4 already committed to TTech
For us, 5 for 5 refers to the top 5 players in the state of Texas.
Posted on 8/9/14 at 10:07 am to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
For us, 5 for 5 refers to the top 5 players in the state of Texas.
I thought it was for how many of your cheerleaders were male.
Posted on 8/9/14 at 10:31 am to LSU Patrick
Posted on 8/9/14 at 10:44 am to bee Rye
quote:
then I guess y'all are just cherry picking which recruiting service fits you agenda the best then, because according to this board, the 247 composite is the standard, and at the moment, you have 2/5 with #4 already committed to TTech
BOOM
Posted on 8/9/14 at 11:52 am to bee Rye
And we lead for the other two.
Page 2 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News