
Started By
Message

Grade the other SEC teams' crootin classes, thus far
Posted on 1/7/15 at 6:20 pm
Posted on 1/7/15 at 6:20 pm
Grade the other classes based on overall performance, need, positions filled, impact/elite players, the schools themselves, past classes, etc.
Alabama - 98, A+ (sets the curve)
Tennessee - 94, A
Georgia - 93, A-
LSU - 92, A-
Auburn - 91, A-
Texas A&M - 90, A-
Mississippi State - 87, B+
South Carolina - 87, B+
Arkansas - 85, B
Kentucky - 85, B
Vanderbilt - 81, B-
Missouri - 78, C+
Florida - 64, D
Alabama - 98, A+ (sets the curve)
Tennessee - 94, A
Georgia - 93, A-
LSU - 92, A-
Auburn - 91, A-
Texas A&M - 90, A-
Mississippi State - 87, B+
South Carolina - 87, B+
Arkansas - 85, B
Kentucky - 85, B
Vanderbilt - 81, B-
Missouri - 78, C+
Florida - 64, D
This post was edited on 1/7/15 at 6:29 pm
Posted on 1/7/15 at 6:21 pm to Tornado Alley
Florida- C
Thanks for your generosity.
Thanks for your generosity.
Posted on 1/7/15 at 6:24 pm to Tornado Alley
Posted on 1/7/15 at 6:24 pm to Tornado Alley
Haha it's honestly a F- right now. Will Muschamp the fricking clown leaves McElwain with 7 verbals with 4 weeks to recruit.
This post was edited on 1/7/15 at 6:29 pm
Posted on 1/7/15 at 6:27 pm to gatordmb89
quote:
Haha it's honelatly a F- right now. Will Muschamp the fricking clown leaves McElwain with 7 verbals with 4 weeks to recruit.
Honestly, yall should've fired him last year. You can't recruit with that kind of uncertainty around your Head coach. SCar is having the same problem.
Glad yall didn't though
Posted on 1/7/15 at 6:27 pm to Weagle25
quote:
Well if I had to rank them...
quote:
Grade the other SEC teams' crootin classes, thus far
quote:
Grade
Posted on 1/7/15 at 6:28 pm to UMRealist
He can't tell me what to do. I wanted to rank them...I spent a lot of time on that and you just come in here and trash it.
This post was edited on 1/7/15 at 6:29 pm
Posted on 1/7/15 at 6:32 pm to Weagle25
He could have/should have taken more verbals early. The staff was lazy and were relying solely on the season. They kept telling guys, "if you are uncertain at all, just wait." They could have had many of the higher rated kids already committed. It was a lazy strategy that really screwed UF.
Posted on 1/8/15 at 5:26 am to Tornado Alley
I would not rank Auburns that high right now.
Posted on 1/8/15 at 6:50 am to LanierSpots
quote:
I would not rank Auburns that high right now.
I'm underwhelmed.
Posted on 1/8/15 at 8:14 am to NorthGwinnettTiger
quote:
I'm underwhelmed.
It could end up great but for now, its not that great considering.
Posted on 1/8/15 at 8:21 am to Tornado Alley
4 5*s and likely ending with 6-7 and we are at a 98? 
Posted on 1/8/15 at 8:26 am to Tornado Alley
Interesting. Why would you rank UT's above UGA' out of curiosity?
Posted on 1/8/15 at 9:00 am to Porter Osborne Jr
quote:
Interesting. Why would you rank UT's above UGA' out of curiosity?
I think he gives it a higher "Grade" because it is probably harder to achieve a class that is pretty much a inch behind UGA's class at a program that has had 7 straight seasons of at least 6 losses and in a state that doesn't just breed SEC football players.
It isn't a ranking, it is a grade.
This post was edited on 1/8/15 at 9:01 am
Posted on 1/8/15 at 9:02 am to Tornado Alley
I am giving everyone an A for effort.
Posted on 1/8/15 at 9:03 am to Ericvol2096
Also ours is ranked higher than yours when you take out crappy ESPN and Scout and just look at 247's rankings.
LINK
LINK
Posted on 1/8/15 at 9:05 am to Tornado Alley
I will provide an answer once ink goes to paper. There are more flips to come and big gets to get. So not worth looking at things in detail when things will change still with less then a month to go.
Posted on 1/8/15 at 9:39 am to Tornado Alley
quote:
Missouri - 78, C+
Considering we always have a B/C ranking, this group may have the most potential out of any class in last 5-6 years. Very Excited. Also if we get Beckner Jr. I'd assume we would move to B+?

Popular
Back to top

8









