Started By
Message
locked post

Grade the other SEC teams' crootin classes, thus far

Posted on 1/7/15 at 6:20 pm
Posted by Tornado Alley
Member since Mar 2012
28796 posts
Posted on 1/7/15 at 6:20 pm
Grade the other classes based on overall performance, need, positions filled, impact/elite players, the schools themselves, past classes, etc.

Alabama - 98, A+ (sets the curve)
Tennessee - 94, A
Georgia - 93, A-
LSU - 92, A-
Auburn - 91, A-
Texas A&M - 90, A-
Mississippi State - 87, B+
South Carolina - 87, B+
Arkansas - 85, B
Kentucky - 85, B
Vanderbilt - 81, B-
Missouri - 78, C+
Florida - 64, D

This post was edited on 1/7/15 at 6:29 pm
Posted by gatordmb89
Member since Dec 2009
30996 posts
Posted on 1/7/15 at 6:21 pm to
Florida- C

Thanks for your generosity.
Posted by Tornado Alley
Member since Mar 2012
28796 posts
Posted on 1/7/15 at 6:22 pm to
You're welcome
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
47651 posts
Posted on 1/7/15 at 6:24 pm to
Well if I had to rank them...

LINK
Posted by gatordmb89
Member since Dec 2009
30996 posts
Posted on 1/7/15 at 6:24 pm to
Haha it's honestly a F- right now. Will Muschamp the fricking clown leaves McElwain with 7 verbals with 4 weeks to recruit.
This post was edited on 1/7/15 at 6:29 pm
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
47651 posts
Posted on 1/7/15 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

Haha it's honelatly a F- right now. Will Muschamp the fricking clown leaves McElwain with 7 verbals with 4 weeks to recruit.

Honestly, yall should've fired him last year. You can't recruit with that kind of uncertainty around your Head coach. SCar is having the same problem.

Glad yall didn't though
Posted by UMRealist
Member since Feb 2013
35906 posts
Posted on 1/7/15 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

Well if I had to rank them...



quote:

Grade the other SEC teams' crootin classes, thus far



quote:

Grade
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
47651 posts
Posted on 1/7/15 at 6:28 pm to
He can't tell me what to do. I wanted to rank them...I spent a lot of time on that and you just come in here and trash it.
This post was edited on 1/7/15 at 6:29 pm
Posted by Tornado Alley
Member since Mar 2012
28796 posts
Posted on 1/7/15 at 6:29 pm to
Posted by gatordmb89
Member since Dec 2009
30996 posts
Posted on 1/7/15 at 6:32 pm to
He could have/should have taken more verbals early. The staff was lazy and were relying solely on the season. They kept telling guys, "if you are uncertain at all, just wait." They could have had many of the higher rated kids already committed. It was a lazy strategy that really screwed UF.
Posted by LanierSpots
Gulf of America / Sarasota FL
Member since Sep 2010
72235 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 5:26 am to
I would not rank Auburns that high right now.


Posted by NorthGwinnettTiger
Member since Jun 2006
53413 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 6:50 am to
quote:

I would not rank Auburns that high right now.


I'm underwhelmed.
Posted by LanierSpots
Gulf of America / Sarasota FL
Member since Sep 2010
72235 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 8:14 am to
quote:

I'm underwhelmed.


It could end up great but for now, its not that great considering.
Posted by alabamabuckeye
Member since Jun 2010
22501 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 8:21 am to
4 5*s and likely ending with 6-7 and we are at a 98?
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
44312 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 8:26 am to
Interesting. Why would you rank UT's above UGA' out of curiosity?
Posted by Ericvol2096
Charleston, SC
Member since May 2013
2588 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 9:00 am to
quote:

Interesting. Why would you rank UT's above UGA' out of curiosity?


I think he gives it a higher "Grade" because it is probably harder to achieve a class that is pretty much a inch behind UGA's class at a program that has had 7 straight seasons of at least 6 losses and in a state that doesn't just breed SEC football players.

It isn't a ranking, it is a grade.
This post was edited on 1/8/15 at 9:01 am
Posted by Eric Nies Grind Time
Member since Sep 2012
25530 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 9:02 am to
I am giving everyone an A for effort.
Posted by Ericvol2096
Charleston, SC
Member since May 2013
2588 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 9:03 am to
Also ours is ranked higher than yours when you take out crappy ESPN and Scout and just look at 247's rankings.

LINK
Posted by nebraskafaninwi
Member since Mar 2013
2655 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 9:05 am to
I will provide an answer once ink goes to paper. There are more flips to come and big gets to get. So not worth looking at things in detail when things will change still with less then a month to go.
Posted by mizslu314
Dirty STL
Member since Sep 2013
16753 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 9:39 am to
quote:

Missouri - 78, C+


Considering we always have a B/C ranking, this group may have the most potential out of any class in last 5-6 years. Very Excited. Also if we get Beckner Jr. I'd assume we would move to B+?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•Twitter