Started By
Message
re: WSJ: Hugh Freeze’s Ouster at Ole Miss Linked to Multiple Recruiting Trips
Posted on 8/16/17 at 11:52 am to BulldogDX
Posted on 8/16/17 at 11:52 am to BulldogDX
This is one of those situations that confirm the university's need to let him go, but does not clarify a damn thing for anyone wanting to know how bad this really was.
IF they were for himself, they pretty much have to can him. If they were for recruits, they definitely have to can him.
IF they were for himself, they pretty much have to can him. If they were for recruits, they definitely have to can him.
0
Posted on 8/16/17 at 11:52 am to tider04
Hugh didn't invent this tactic for recruiting. I wonder who he learned it from ?
Posted on 8/16/17 at 11:55 am to AHM21
The article still never explicitly states that it wasn't male escorts. Fingers crossed for that epic melt to come to fruition!
Posted on 8/16/17 at 11:57 am to 327ftpersec
quote:
The article still never explicitly states that it wasn't male escorts. Fingers crossed for that epic melt to come to fruition!
Now that would be one of those epic melts that only come out every so often...
Posted on 8/16/17 at 12:35 pm to AHM21
quote:
Tampa, FL
Mons Venus doe...
Posted on 8/16/17 at 12:45 pm to momentoftruth87
We like talking trash about Ole Miss. If you don't like it then walk away. We will never forget being #1 for 5 weeks. That happens once in like 110 years.
Posted on 8/16/17 at 12:50 pm to AHM21
fake news. 
quote:
restored the program to glory
quote:
a big-time, SEC program
Posted on 8/16/17 at 12:56 pm to DingLeeBerry
Still don't know if these were for him or for recruits. Does not specify
Posted on 8/16/17 at 1:09 pm to tiger perry
quote:
Still don't know if these were for him or for recruits. Does not specify
Recruits don't need escorts. They rule the school and have their pick of the litter already.
You know who doesn't? Dirty old men... they have to pay for it.
Posted on 8/16/17 at 1:10 pm to AHM21
Bjork told us they were NOT used for recruits.
Posted on 8/16/17 at 1:11 pm to Billy Mays
quote:
Recruits don't need escorts. They rule the school and have their pick of the litter already. You know who doesn't? Dirty old men... they have to pay for it.
I see your point and point taken. Then why was Rick Pitino at Louisville bring in the escorts. Leaves doubt in your mind.
Posted on 8/16/17 at 1:12 pm to Billy Mays
quote:
Recruits don't need escorts.
We've seen a big time program, much bigger than Ole Miss' football program, get busted in the past for buying escorts for recruits.
Why do you think Ole Miss is above that?
This post was edited on 8/16/17 at 1:13 pm
Posted on 8/16/17 at 1:18 pm to tiger perry
quote:
I see your point and point taken. Then why was Rick Pitino at Louisville bring in the escorts. Leaves doubt in your mind.
Sure, but whatever Pitino does has no relation to Freeze - would just be anecdotal evidence.
I'm sure sometime in the history of football recruiting, an escort has been paid for a player... doesn't seem to be the case with Freeze. Dude just wanted to get laid on the road from all accounts.
Posted on 8/16/17 at 1:22 pm to Billy Mays
The story to the NCAA is these calls were for personal use. The conversation at home is he was buying them for recruits. Unless he just comes clean one way or the other. Whatever it is I hope he has not ruined his life.
Posted on 8/16/17 at 1:24 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
We've seen a big time program, much bigger than Ole Miss' football program, get busted in the past for buying escorts for recruits.
Why do you think Ole Miss is above that?
Don't know why how big of a program it is matters - if a coach wants to engage in dirty recruiting they will. Is Alabama above paying escorts? Is Ohio State? There has been no evidence of setting up recruiting for escorts in regards to Freeze. This is per Ole Miss detractors, not just Ole Miss admin.
It's pretty clear Freeze was stepping out on his wife - his giving up $16M basically confirms it. What a pleb
Posted on 8/16/17 at 1:28 pm to Billy Mays
I was responding to your post here, where you made a stance that the escorts weren't for recruits because recruits don't need escorts to get laid.
If a yearly national contender decides it would benefit them to buy escorts for recruits, why is it an abstract idea for Ole Miss?
Connect the dots, IMO.
quote:
Recruits don't need escorts. They rule the school and have their pick of the litter already.
You know who doesn't? Dirty old men... they have to pay for it.
If a yearly national contender decides it would benefit them to buy escorts for recruits, why is it an abstract idea for Ole Miss?
Connect the dots, IMO.
Posted on 8/16/17 at 1:29 pm to AHM21
Since the call was so short, is it possible he found out about the escorts and called the number just to see who answered? Then failed to stop it from occurring? Perhaps he never cheated on his wife?
Posted on 8/16/17 at 1:41 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
Hope you see what I'm saying.
You are saying that you are jelly of State and Mullen. Obvious. Also, State fans aren't the only ones posting about Ole Miss. Far from it actually. Don't be so butthurt over the bulldogs bro.
Posted on 8/16/17 at 1:43 pm to Billy Mays
quote:
Recruits don't need escorts. They rule the school and have their pick of the litter already
Sure they don't need them, but if somebody else is picking up the tab...
Also, if you're going to hire someone to do a job are you going to pick a professional with years of hands-on experience or are you going to pick an amateur who may or may not have some experience (or maybe just watched a video one time and thinks they know what they are doing)?
Posted on 8/16/17 at 1:50 pm to UAtide11
Good think we parted ways with that bad bad man. Larry what was his name again?
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News