Started By
Message
Would your current record be any different had you played this schedule?
Posted on 11/24/25 at 10:34 am
Posted on 11/24/25 at 10:34 am
What do you think? Would your team have a better, worse or similar record had they played this schedule in this sequence, as opposed to the schedule you’ve played to date?
(The teams’ current AP rankings are denoted. If there’s not a notation, they are unranked.)
Texas (16)
Grambling
Ohio
@ Washington
Minnesota
@ Illinois
@ Wisconsin
Penn State
@ Purdue
UCLA
Rutgers
(The teams’ current AP rankings are denoted. If there’s not a notation, they are unranked.)
Texas (16)
Grambling
Ohio
@ Washington
Minnesota
@ Illinois
@ Wisconsin
Penn State
@ Purdue
UCLA
Rutgers
This post was edited on 11/24/25 at 10:41 am
Posted on 11/24/25 at 10:35 am to prouddawg
Are you asking if our season would be different if our season was different?
Those Georgia Tech fans have a point
Those Georgia Tech fans have a point
Posted on 11/24/25 at 10:36 am to prouddawg
No Alabama=UGA undefeated.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 10:37 am to prouddawg
Better but not much better, Napier would still go 6-6 or 5-7.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 10:37 am to cbi8
It’s pretty obvious what he is trying to say. State grads/fans don’t have any room to call other SEC grads/fans dumb.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 10:40 am to prouddawg
Well lucky for them they get Michigan in 5 days to boost their schedule. But unlucky for them they’ll likely lose again
Posted on 11/24/25 at 10:41 am to Nasty_Canasta
That's why the expanded playoff sucks. OSU could lose again and it still won't matter in the big picture.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 10:42 am to cbi8
What part of the following do you not understand? I’ll try to help.
Would your team have a better, worse or similar record had they played this schedule in this sequence, as opposed to the schedule you’ve played to date?
Would your team have a better, worse or similar record had they played this schedule in this sequence, as opposed to the schedule you’ve played to date?
This post was edited on 11/24/25 at 10:58 am
Posted on 11/24/25 at 10:45 am to GoGators1995
quote:
That's why the expanded playoff sucks. OSU could lose again and it still won't matter in the big picture.
I mean on one hand I can see why they expanded it. Money for the conferences and it keep the interest of other fanbase involved for much longer. Plus it cuts down on opt outs for the teams who have a shot. It does disregard the importance of the regular season, which I hate. But I’ll still watch. Even with a win over OSU, I’m not sure Michigan gets an invite. I don’t really care if they do. I’m just pulling for chaos at this point
Posted on 11/24/25 at 10:45 am to prouddawg
Nope. Our record wouldn’t change at all with that schedule.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 10:46 am to Nasty_Canasta
Imagine if the CFP was still 4 teams last year or we still had the 2 team BCS? People would be planting flags on Jack Sawyer's lawn for the rest of his life. 
Posted on 11/24/25 at 10:49 am to prouddawg
quote:
Texas (16) - W
Grambling - W
Ohio - W
@ Washington - L
Minnesota - W
@ Illinois - L
@ Wisconsin - W
Penn State - W
@ Purdue - W
UCLA - W
Rutgers - W
For LSU: Probably 9-2, Kelly still coach and maybe in the playoffs.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 10:54 am to prouddawg
Undefeated
We beat the highest ranked team on that schedule convincingly.
We beat the highest ranked team on that schedule convincingly.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 11:01 am to prouddawg
@ washington would be the swing game for LSU
I think LSU might even warrant playoff consideration with that schedule
I think LSU might even warrant playoff consideration with that schedule
Posted on 11/24/25 at 11:17 am to GurleyGirl
quote:
Undefeated
Our defense had some serious growing up to do early on, but Arch looked horrible then, as well. I would still take us over Texas at that point, and certainly over everyone else on that schedule.
Popular
Back to top
10








