re: Will Brandon Harris pass for 1,000 this season?

quote:

---

WildTchoupitoulas

---

quote:

---

Jesus man, just let it go. I get it, you think Harris should be throwing the ball more, and I think the coaches are just going to call the plays they think will win the game. To this point Miles has more wins at LSU than any other coach at their current team other than Gary Patterson, and Miles beat him too. I'll let him coach. What are you, a fricking State Farm agent or some shite?

---

I get it. You can't defend the logic behind what you're saying so you've resorted to the ad hominem. But each of the examples I gave you paints the picture I'm driving at.

Your logic makes zero sense. You know it. But somehow you want to attack me and make me into some prick because I won't spit the bit.

Meanwhile, you can use circular logic like, "We don't pass the ball because we can win with the run," and tap dance around the inherent-and I mean this with all due respect as you're a grown man and a fellow LSU Fan-stupidity of that thought process and its okay?

GMAFB...Evidently its beyond you to think critically about a team you support to the level that you do. Personally I'll put my enthusiasm and love for the University I attended up against anyone's. At the same time I won't question anyone's level of fandom or fanhood, etc.

What I will question is their intelligence...and this argument you keep looping into makes it look like you don't have much intelligence to answer my questions...

If you can't defend your own point, then admit it and just move on. Don't attack me and try to provoke me with the ad hominem stuff.

Does he need to?

quote:

---

The route he going he will make it to 500 lol

---

Let's hope your route leads to Sylvan

quote:

---

WildTchoupitoulas

---

quote:

---

It's not circular. It's just the philosophy that you run until you can't, then you pass. I'm sorry if that's too complicated for you.

---

This matches exactly with, "You spend your money until you can't. Then you save it."

It's like saying, "Well, there's no emergency right now. Since there's no emergency, there's no reason to prepare for the emergency."

This is-exactly-the definition of circular logic. You're using Sentence 2 to confirm Sentence 1. Sentence 2 becomes a fallacy because there is no way that it can prove Sentence 1, nor can you prove Sentence 2 for that matter.

I can keep going if you like. I know you're trying your hardest here. Just let me know.

quote:

---

Will Brandon Harris pass for 1,000 this season?

---

Nope.

Happy?

quote:

---

It's like saying, "Well, there's no emergency right now. Since there's no emergency, there's no reason to prepare for the emergency."

---

What you're saying is that they can't prepare for a hurricane unless they're in a hurricane. ie, they can't prepare to pass in a game without passing in a game. I'm saying they're preparing for the pass in practice, but they won't implement the pass in a game until it's needed. (In general, obviously they are passing some in games.)

But I'll leave the sophomoric analogies to you.

quote:

---

I can keep going

---

Obviously.

quote:

---

GFunk

---

I like your style...