Started By
Message
re: Will Bobby Petrino ever sign a 5 star player?
Posted on 8/6/11 at 12:59 pm to Big Dawg 24
Posted on 8/6/11 at 12:59 pm to Big Dawg 24
2
Posted on 8/6/11 at 1:00 pm to TT9
101
Posted on 8/6/11 at 1:01 pm to Big Dawg 24
quote:
Did you read my post? I said they had a lot of talent, but some of the biggest differences makers weren't 5 stars. They were stacked at a lot of places. However, that is a completely different defense without Dareus. Plus, McElroy was the starting QB over a guy or two more highly rated than him. Then throw in other guys like Javier Arenas (3 star) that were flat out difference makers. I didn't say that it was a perfect comparison. I was only pointing out the fact that you take those 3 stars away from Bama that year and you would have had a completely different team.
Once again you're kidding yourself if you think the higher star talent didn't make a major difference for Bama in that championship season. That was a horrible comparison. Bama didn't win a national title on the back lower-rated talent in general.
Posted on 8/6/11 at 1:02 pm to memphisplaya
Posted on 8/6/11 at 1:03 pm to TT9
quote:
TT13
Maybe successful troll was successful.....
Posted on 8/6/11 at 1:03 pm to thunderbird1100
The bigger question is: Why is CBP whipping our arse with 5.7 3 stars?
Posted on 8/6/11 at 1:04 pm to Lieutenant Dan
Haha,true... 
Posted on 8/6/11 at 1:07 pm to TT9
Posted on 8/6/11 at 1:07 pm to thunderbird1100
I respectfully disagree with you. Heck, Bama's starting LT that year was James Carpenter, a 2 star out of high school that I believe was originally committed to Iowa State. They had talent, yes. However, it was a lot more than talent that won that championship. They had superior coaching and they were probably one of the most dedicated teams I have ever seen.
This post was edited on 8/6/11 at 1:09 pm
Posted on 8/6/11 at 1:07 pm to Big Dawg 24
quote:
marries Erin Andrews.
Erin nice enough to look at (for me anyway), but my gut tells me the bitch factor is way too high...
Posted on 8/6/11 at 1:08 pm to Lieutenant Dan
nah this is small for a flagship thread.
Posted on 8/6/11 at 1:10 pm to heartbreakTiger
True story. Overall, this is very weak compared to a lot of the Arkansas-LSU threads of the last 6 months.
Posted on 8/6/11 at 1:13 pm to heartbreakTiger
quote:
nah this is small for a flagship thread.
I'm sick and fukking tired of hearing all this flagship talk. Ark is a ONE trick pony...Thats all. No defense. He can't recruit the elite talent to be a dominant defense. Not a flame, but they're the ttech of the sec.
Posted on 8/6/11 at 1:14 pm to heartbreakTiger
Thread ain't over with yet..
Posted on 8/6/11 at 1:14 pm to TheCheshireHog
Well, just to set the record straight about total offense and defense......
TOTAL OFFENSE G Rush Pass Plays Yards Avg/P TD Avg/G
1. Auburn 14 3987 3002 948 6989 7.4 72 499.2
2. Arkansas 13 1935 4338 886 6273 7.1 58 482.5
3. Alabama 13 2378 3395 829 5773 7.0 54 444.1
4. Kentucky 13 2061 3501 910 5562 6.1 52 427.8
5. Miss. State 13 2793 2424 907 5217 5.8 46 401.3
6. Ole Miss 12 2491 2307 826 4798 5.8 45 399.8
7. S. Carolina 14 2161 3338 911 5499 6.0 49 392.8
8. Georgia 13 1854 3151 814 5005 6.1 46 385.0
9. Tennessee 13 1420 3309 827 4729 5.7 40 363.8
10. Florida 13 2165 2396 885 4561 5.2 43 350.8
11. LSU 13 2414 2023 839 4437 5.3 39 341.3
12. Vanderbilt 12 1666 1913 781 3579 4.6 24 298.2
TOTAL DEFENSE G Rush Pass Plays Yards Avg/P TD Avg/G
1. Alabama 13 1432 2291 802 3723 4.6 18 286.4
2. Florida 13 1698 2287 853 3985 4.7 31 306.5
3. LSU 13 1785 2208 822 3993 4.9 30 307.2
4. Georgia 13 1914 2357 828 4271 5.2 38 328.5
5. Arkansas 13 2114 2409 862 4523 5.2 34 347.9
6. Kentucky 13 2302 2302 820 4604 5.6 44 354.2
7. S. Carolina 14 1574 3387 927 4961 5.4 36 354.4
8. Miss. State 13 1548 3091 881 4639 5.3 30 356.8
9. Auburn 14 1527 3630 963 5157 5.4 41 368.4
10. Tennessee 13 1983 2985 913 4968 5.4 37 382.2
11. Ole Miss 12 1834 2956 765 4790 6.3 45 399.2
12. Vanderbilt 12 2316 2715 868 5031 5.8 43 419.2
TOTAL OFFENSE G Rush Pass Plays Yards Avg/P TD Avg/G
1. Auburn 14 3987 3002 948 6989 7.4 72 499.2
2. Arkansas 13 1935 4338 886 6273 7.1 58 482.5
3. Alabama 13 2378 3395 829 5773 7.0 54 444.1
4. Kentucky 13 2061 3501 910 5562 6.1 52 427.8
5. Miss. State 13 2793 2424 907 5217 5.8 46 401.3
6. Ole Miss 12 2491 2307 826 4798 5.8 45 399.8
7. S. Carolina 14 2161 3338 911 5499 6.0 49 392.8
8. Georgia 13 1854 3151 814 5005 6.1 46 385.0
9. Tennessee 13 1420 3309 827 4729 5.7 40 363.8
10. Florida 13 2165 2396 885 4561 5.2 43 350.8
11. LSU 13 2414 2023 839 4437 5.3 39 341.3
12. Vanderbilt 12 1666 1913 781 3579 4.6 24 298.2
TOTAL DEFENSE G Rush Pass Plays Yards Avg/P TD Avg/G
1. Alabama 13 1432 2291 802 3723 4.6 18 286.4
2. Florida 13 1698 2287 853 3985 4.7 31 306.5
3. LSU 13 1785 2208 822 3993 4.9 30 307.2
4. Georgia 13 1914 2357 828 4271 5.2 38 328.5
5. Arkansas 13 2114 2409 862 4523 5.2 34 347.9
6. Kentucky 13 2302 2302 820 4604 5.6 44 354.2
7. S. Carolina 14 1574 3387 927 4961 5.4 36 354.4
8. Miss. State 13 1548 3091 881 4639 5.3 30 356.8
9. Auburn 14 1527 3630 963 5157 5.4 41 368.4
10. Tennessee 13 1983 2985 913 4968 5.4 37 382.2
11. Ole Miss 12 1834 2956 765 4790 6.3 45 399.2
12. Vanderbilt 12 2316 2715 868 5031 5.8 43 419.2
Posted on 8/6/11 at 1:14 pm to WonderWartHawg
quote:
The bigger question is: Why is CBP whipping our arse with 5.7 3 stars?
It certainly can't be coaching.
Posted on 8/6/11 at 1:17 pm to TT9
Damn TT, if you wanna troll, troll with facts. frick
Posted on 8/6/11 at 1:20 pm to Choctaw Hog
No top 10 recruiting classes = no championships
Why is this so hard to understand arky?
Why is this so hard to understand arky?
Posted on 8/6/11 at 1:20 pm to Lieutenant Dan
quote:
I'm sick and fukking tired of hearing all this flagship talk. Ark is a ONE trick pony...Thats all. No defense. He can't recruit the elite talent to be a dominant defense. Not a flame, but they're the ttech of the sec.
I think what we have reached here is a put up or shut-up moment. This isn't about where we fall in statistical rankings. We can show facts proving improvements are made (defense). We can show a Win progression. What we can't show is a skin that is meaningful. A scoop and score could have rendered this thread null. It didn't happen and now all the "proof" and rhetoric in the world won't help the cause. This only works with world-beaters like LSU and Alabama.
IF we win the West this season, mindsets will change. IF we lose the SECCG, things will get worse. But just like all things pre-season, all we have today are IFs. Passes the time.
Posted on 8/6/11 at 1:22 pm to Sao
quote:
I think what we have reached here is a put up or shut-up moment. This isn't about where we fall in statistical rankings. We can show facts proving improvements are made (defense). We can show a Win progression. What we can't show is a skin that is meaningful. A scoop and score could have rendered this thread null. It didn't happen and now all the "proof" and rhetoric in the world won't help the cause. This only works with world-beaters like LSU and Alabama.
IF we win the West this season, mindsets will change. IF we lose the SECCG, things will get worse. But just like all things pre-season, all we have today are IFs. Passes the time.
Wow....thats some deep shite.... :puffpuffpass:
This post was edited on 8/6/11 at 1:23 pm
Page 6 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News