Started By
Message
re: Which RB would you rather have?
Posted on 9/8/14 at 12:48 pm to Projectpat
Posted on 9/8/14 at 12:48 pm to Projectpat
Jalen Hurd
Posted on 9/8/14 at 1:08 pm to Projectpat
quote:
RB2: 92 yards on 13 carries (7.1 yard avg), 1 TD
this one
Posted on 9/8/14 at 1:09 pm to cas4t
Speaking of RB threads...we need our weekly RB ranking from WDE.
Posted on 9/8/14 at 1:14 pm to parkjas2001
LF7 was spanked after the pose, he could have easily had a 100+ yards, 3-4 TD game.
Posted on 9/8/14 at 1:25 pm to ChaseRichardsUncle
Yea Miles gave away his TD to Magee after LF got it to the goal line 

Posted on 9/8/14 at 1:26 pm to cas4t
this is a fricking stupid thread
no one would rather have our 5th string, walk on RB
OP is just another fricktard poster making stupid aTm threads that make us look bad
no one would rather have our 5th string, walk on RB
OP is just another fricktard poster making stupid aTm threads that make us look bad
Posted on 9/8/14 at 1:30 pm to cas4t
"see my running back" "love my running back"
these threads.. really..

Posted on 9/8/14 at 1:33 pm to Projectpat
quote:
Which RB would you rather have?
Posted on 9/8/14 at 1:44 pm to LanierSpots
Not enough data to draw a conclusion:
-Need opponent(s)
-Quality of OLine
-Need more carries (ie. flip a coin 10 times you might get 9 heads and 1 tail......flip the coin 10,000 times you will NOT get 9,000 heads and 1,000 tails. Larger sample = more likely the true outcome/quality of the RB or the true probability of coin flips)
-Were any of the carries in goal line/short yardage as this would negatively impact ypc
-Need opponent(s)
-Quality of OLine
-Need more carries (ie. flip a coin 10 times you might get 9 heads and 1 tail......flip the coin 10,000 times you will NOT get 9,000 heads and 1,000 tails. Larger sample = more likely the true outcome/quality of the RB or the true probability of coin flips)
-Were any of the carries in goal line/short yardage as this would negatively impact ypc
This post was edited on 9/8/14 at 1:45 pm
Posted on 9/8/14 at 1:45 pm to Projectpat
I would not take #1. Not unless he's playing with the team already up by 60+ points.
Posted on 9/8/14 at 1:46 pm to skrangeo
quote:
no one would rather have our 5th string, walk on RB
Damn, you're smart.

Posted on 9/8/14 at 1:49 pm to Projectpat
I'd take this group of running backs:
Back 1 - 20 carries, 132 yards, 2 TD
Back 2 - 7 carries, 30 yards, 3 TD
Back 3 - 15 carries, 75 yards
Back 4 - 11 carries, 62 yards, 2 TD
Back 5 - 11 carries, 86 yards, 1 TD
Over 2 games, that's 64 carries for 385 yards and 8 TDs.
Back 1 - 20 carries, 132 yards, 2 TD
Back 2 - 7 carries, 30 yards, 3 TD
Back 3 - 15 carries, 75 yards
Back 4 - 11 carries, 62 yards, 2 TD
Back 5 - 11 carries, 86 yards, 1 TD
Over 2 games, that's 64 carries for 385 yards and 8 TDs.
Posted on 9/8/14 at 2:09 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
That's adorable, our top 3 RBs would be the top 3 RBs at A&M
Better question though, how many yards will your RBs have on their 6 carries against LSU this year?
Better question though, how many yards will your RBs have on their 6 carries against LSU this year?
Posted on 9/8/14 at 2:44 pm to skrangeo
quote:
this is a fricking stupid thread no one would rather have our 5th string, walk on RB OP is just another fricktard poster making stupid aTm threads that make us look bad
Agree on all counts
Posted on 9/8/14 at 8:51 pm to Projectpat
quote:
Similar opponent, end of game stat lines:
RB1: 86 yards on 11 carries (7.8 yard avg), 1 TD
RB2: 92 yards on 13 carries (7.1 yard avg), 1 TD
Which RB would you rather have?
Don't know about RB1, but RB2 got the ball down to the goal line, but was punished and his TD given to another back. Earlier in the game, RB was used as a decoy to get another true freshman RB, playing at FB, a TD on 1 yard line. So RB2, could have had 3 TDs. Also RB2 had 2 catches for 32 yards, where he looked like a WR on both.
P.S. Even though both are FCS, Lamar is not as good as Sam Houston State
Popular
Back to top
