Started By
Message

re: What is the least talented team to win the NC in the 2010’s.

Posted on 2/28/21 at 8:46 pm to
Posted by BamaIsGoat
Member since Jan 2021
291 posts
Posted on 2/28/21 at 8:46 pm to
That is crazy I never knew that team was so stacked
Posted by plazadweller
South Georgia
Member since Jul 2011
11442 posts
Posted on 2/28/21 at 8:50 pm to
On paper they should have dominated us in the NCG
Posted by BamaIsGoat
Member since Jan 2021
291 posts
Posted on 2/28/21 at 8:52 pm to
Auburn’s rushing attack late into 2013 was unstoppable
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83459 posts
Posted on 2/28/21 at 8:55 pm to
Was 2013 or 2014 the season they had so many 2nd half comebacks? I think it was 2014.

Either way, those 2 FSU teams were a TON of fun to watch.

Winston’s turnover problems in his Championship defending season were mind blowing to me, though.

ETA: 25 TDs 18 INTs on a championship level team for a heisman #1 overall pick is absolutely insane. And knowing him he probably fumbled ~5 times too.

If an Alabama QB threw 18 picks Saban would have them murdered(probably around the 10th INT).
This post was edited on 2/28/21 at 9:02 pm
Posted by Frac the world
The Centennial State
Member since Oct 2014
16786 posts
Posted on 2/28/21 at 9:13 pm to
After 2010 Auburn this is actually pretty tough.

Are we factoring in NFL success? Cause if so, 2011 Bama might actually have an argument for second place considering Trent busted and nobody else on offense did a damn thing. The defense had Hightower, Moseley, and Kirkpatrick but that’s really it for NFL success.

In terms of NFL output OSU was top notch, they had Zeke, Bosa, and Michael Thomas on that team.

FSU was loaded at the time but outside of Jalen Ramsey can’t really think of a stud NFL guy. Kind of the same with 2016 Clemson besides Deshaun Watson.

I might put 2016 Clemson behind Auburn in 2nd place or this may be blasphemy but 2011 Bama I think has to be considered if NFL success is factored. It’s a tough list to make if you’re comparing talent at the time vs NFL success once they went pro. That can distort things quite a bit. Because that 2011 Bama team was amazing, but looking at NFL success it’s pretty underwhelming.
This post was edited on 2/28/21 at 9:16 pm
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
44874 posts
Posted on 2/28/21 at 9:22 pm to
Agree with most of your points especially looking through the lens of NFL success
Posted by TTsTowel
RIP Bow9den/Coastie
Member since Feb 2010
91645 posts
Posted on 2/28/21 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

Think of all the talented teams in that decade. FSU is on the bottom end of that list
That FSU team was stacked.
Posted by TTsTowel
RIP Bow9den/Coastie
Member since Feb 2010
91645 posts
Posted on 2/28/21 at 9:28 pm to
quote:

Arkansas would have pulled it out in the end
No, they wouldn’t have. Auburn would’ve still beaten Arkansas, just like everyone else that year.
Posted by FearlessFreep
Baja Alabama
Member since Nov 2009
17288 posts
Posted on 2/28/21 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

If Mallet didn't get hurt then that game would had a different result. Arkansas would have pulled it out in the end because they had a well balanced offense that could destroy a defense in the air and carve them up on the ground. But taking out Mallet was the game winner for Auburn.
I was at that game.

Wilson was 25-34 for 332 yards and 4 TDs, he looked considerably better than Mallet did (he went out at the early in the 2nd quarter having gone 10-15 for 95 yards). Wilson proceeded to complete 16 of his first 18 passes and lead y'all to 4 consecutive TDs. I daresay Mallet wouldn't have done any better.

What killed you (and what kept us in the game) was ST play. We scored 2 TDs off a blocked punt deep in your territory and a 99-yard KO return. Wilson didn't throw his first INT until about 9 minutes left in the game, when we were already up by 8 points.
Posted by 1BamaRTR
In Your Head Blvd
Member since Apr 2015
22525 posts
Posted on 2/28/21 at 10:53 pm to
quote:

11 and 17 Bama didn't win their division.

OP wasn’t asking least dominant, he was asking least talented. That 2011 and 2017 Bama teams still had loads of talents. The 2011 numbers have already been posted here before.

That 2017 Bama team had Hurts and Tua at QB. FOUR first rounders at WR. Another 2 WRs that went undrafted but each started NFL games. 2nd round pick at TE, 2nd round pick at RB, and another 1st rounder in RB Jacobs. 3/5 starting OL are in the NFL with 2 being staters. 1 of the backups was a 1st round pick with another one a possibility. The defense has 8 guys who are starters in the NFL. Even have a starting punter.
This post was edited on 2/28/21 at 10:56 pm
Posted by Rawanduncut
Member since Sep 2019
482 posts
Posted on 2/28/21 at 11:52 pm to
That 2013 Fsu team was loaded. All 22 starters played in the NFL. The only close game for Fsu was the national championship game with Auburn that year. They blew out everyone else.

Sec fans are not going to like it but that Fsu team averaged more points than the 2019 Lsu and 2020 Alabama teams. Plus the Fsu team had a top 5 defense. Based on proven stats the 2013 team is was more dominant than both is one ofthe greatest teams ever.

Posted by AgsNguyening
USA
Member since Jul 2014
2798 posts
Posted on 3/1/21 at 12:37 am to
Four first round picks and five second round picks from the starters that year, but okay.
Posted by swinetime
Member since Apr 2013
4401 posts
Posted on 3/1/21 at 5:00 am to
2021 bama?
Posted by bamameister
Right here, right now
Member since May 2016
14088 posts
Posted on 3/1/21 at 5:59 am to
Jimbo was racking in the talent down in Tallahassee. I think it was the barner team and they were fortunate to be playing a Chip Kelly Oregon.
Posted by Sneaky__Sally
Member since Jul 2015
12364 posts
Posted on 3/1/21 at 7:23 am to
2017 had a lot of great players but id imagine if you just looked at starting 22, it would tell a slightly different story.

Also had a lot of injuries that year
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 3/1/21 at 7:37 am to
quote:

11 and 17 Bama didn't win their division.


A fact that, while true, has absolutely nothing to do with the question posed by the OP.
Posted by VagueMessage
Fayetteville, AR
Member since Jun 2013
3903 posts
Posted on 3/1/21 at 8:22 am to
quote:

On paper they should have dominated us in the NCG




I think people somewhat misremember things. That FSU team didn't have a single close game all year. None of their games until Auburn came within one score, and I think a two TD win at Boston College was the one time they didn't win by 30+. But Auburn was somewhat of a Cinderella story that year. They seemed to be in the NCG by divine providence, and I think they were up by 18 on FSU at halftime. It came down to "who has the ball last wins" and now everyone remembers that Florida State team as the NC winners who could barely beat what should have been a massive underdog.
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 3/1/21 at 8:26 am to
Talent vs Coaching ? Better question is why those teams lost a game, same in 2011. We all know Bama has had the best talent the last 10 years, but without the Mulligans what would the conversation be.
Posted by viceman
Huntsville, AL
Member since Aug 2016
30688 posts
Posted on 3/1/21 at 8:30 am to
quote:

11 and 17 Bama didn't win their division.


Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 3/1/21 at 8:36 am to
Mulligan U.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter