Started By
Message
What if they changed the targeting rule?
Posted on 1/3/19 at 11:44 pm
Posted on 1/3/19 at 11:44 pm
Hey guys, happy new year!
Long story short:
I got high the other night and had a thought...
Instead of the punishment being an ejection and suspension for the next game's half... what if targeting was treated like a "power play" situation, similar to hockey?
The penalized player has to sit out for the next 2 drives AND his team has to play with 10 players, against the opposing team's 11...
Am I dumb? Did this sound better in my head?
Questions, comments, concerns?
Long story short:
I got high the other night and had a thought...
Instead of the punishment being an ejection and suspension for the next game's half... what if targeting was treated like a "power play" situation, similar to hockey?
The penalized player has to sit out for the next 2 drives AND his team has to play with 10 players, against the opposing team's 11...
Am I dumb? Did this sound better in my head?
Questions, comments, concerns?
15
Posted on 1/3/19 at 11:46 pm to teamjackson
quote:
I got high the other night and had a thought...
That you remembered? Sounds like shitty weed.
Posted on 1/3/19 at 11:47 pm to teamjackson
have you ever looked at the back of a $20 bill baw? How come it isn't the back of the dude's head that's on the other side?
Posted on 1/3/19 at 11:47 pm to teamjackson
quote:
Am I dumb?
Why yes, yes you are.
Posted on 1/3/19 at 11:48 pm to teamjackson
quote:Yes.
Am I dumb?
Posted on 1/3/19 at 11:49 pm to teamjackson
quote:
what if targeting was treated like a "power play" situation, similar to hockey?
The penalized player has to sit out for the next 2 drives AND his team has to play with 10 players, against the opposing team's 11...
This might be the best high suggestion I've ever heard.
Posted on 1/3/19 at 11:58 pm to junkfunky
quote:this isn't amateur night at the apollo.
That you remembered?
TJ is a long time herbal connoisseur.
Posted on 1/4/19 at 12:02 am to teamjackson
This would probably impact the game more than tossing a player.
Football is schematically a numbers game. Making one team play a man down for even 2 plays is huge
Football is schematically a numbers game. Making one team play a man down for even 2 plays is huge
Posted on 1/4/19 at 12:53 am to teamjackson
Hahaha i was super stoned for the Sugar Bowl, great life choice!
Posted on 1/4/19 at 1:19 am to teamjackson
Keep smoking hoss! 
Posted on 1/4/19 at 2:44 am to teamjackson
Posted on 1/4/19 at 4:15 am to teamjackson
quote:
What if they changed the targeting rule?
I feel like the rule is changed every time they call it
Posted on 1/4/19 at 5:02 am to teamjackson
Ludes. Think all you want, just don’t drive.
Posted on 1/4/19 at 7:08 am to Jack Daniel
At least I'm not a Clemson fan?
You guys know it was an interesting idea... you know it deep down.
You guys know it was an interesting idea... you know it deep down.
Posted on 1/4/19 at 7:11 am to teamjackson
quote:
Am I dumb?
You shouldn't ask this question. You won't like the answer.
Posted on 1/4/19 at 7:17 am to teamjackson
Yes you are dumb
Posted on 1/4/19 at 7:18 am to teamjackson
Yes you are dumb
Posted on 1/4/19 at 7:31 am to teamjackson
The Delpit ejection is a prime example of why the targeting rule needs to be changed.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News