What has missouri actually brought to the SEC?

They keep talking about their "success" and what they've done while in the sec. So let's take a look:
Fball:
2012: 5-7
2013: 12-2
2014: 11-3



They've done okay in a down east mainly due to a weak SECW schedule and terrible years by SEC powers UF and UT. When they have played The SECW elite they been outscored 143-65 losing 2 SECCGs in blowouts.

Another reason Miz was brought in was because they supposedly had a good basketball team. Lets see:
2012: 23-11 NCAAT
2013: 23-12
2014: 9-23

Miz Bball was average at best w/one short stay if you could call it that in the NCAAT, until they turned into a dumpster fire last year.

Overall so far Mizz compares to the lesser SEC teams like SCAR, Arky and Ole miss who are only able to have success when the elite SEC schools are terrible, otherwise they are near the bottom of the conference.

Mizz is currently 2-1 against UF yes, but that requires context. Mizzs Wins were against the worst UF coach/teams in it's history with the 2014 win being a complete fluke.

Now let's compare UF:
2012: 11-2 BCS bowl
2013: 4-8
2014: 7-5
UF was good in 2012 but stunk in 2013&2014.
I'd give Miz slight edge taking into account the circumstances for their success.

UF Bball:

2012: 29-8 SEC regular season champs and a final 4
2013: 36-3 SEC RS/SECT Champs, #1 overall seed, 1st 18-0 RS in SEC history and a final 4.
2014:16-17 pure shite breaking 20 straight 20win seasons.

There is no question UF was elite during this time but slipped last year.
Massive edge UF


Even with Missouri's "success"they still couldn't accomplish more than UF with future notable achievements looking unlikely.