Started By
Message
re: What has missouri actually brought to the SEC?
Posted on 10/8/15 at 12:09 pm to roadGator
Posted on 10/8/15 at 12:09 pm to roadGator
quote:
Back out of the conversation then. Clearly you have no business discussing why Clem wouldn't be helpful to the SEC. We don't take one way streets.
lol realignment people seem more interested in $$$$$ than football.
1
Posted on 10/8/15 at 12:10 pm to genro
quote:
Sounds to me like Clemson is consistently overrated
finished the past 4 seasons ranked higher than our preseason ranking. I think maybe only program that can say that. sounds more like we are consistently underrated. :)
I believe if Clemson was in SEC, we would have ben ranked in top 2 in preseason. Remember, SC was ranked no. 4 last year in preseason despite losing Conor Shaw and Clowney and other good players. our roster is clearly better than that team's roster last year yet were only ranked 15 or so.
This post was edited on 10/8/15 at 12:12 pm
Posted on 10/8/15 at 12:11 pm to Jamie Lannister
quote:
lol realignment people seem more interested in $$$$$ than football.
Holy shite. No way?
Posted on 10/8/15 at 12:12 pm to Jamie Lannister
quote:You just said Clemson was elite because of high expectations, you fricktard.
finished the past 4 seasons ranked higher than our preseason ranking. I think maybe only program that can say that. sounds more like we are consistently underrated. :)
Which is it?
Posted on 10/8/15 at 12:13 pm to the808bass
quote:
Holy shite. No way?
I'm a football fan, not a money fan outside of paying the bills. :) if SEC was cutting you and other fans checks, I could understand why you care so much.
Posted on 10/8/15 at 12:13 pm to Jamie Lannister
quote:
I believe if Clemson was in SEC, we would have ben ranked in top 2 in preseason. Remember, SC was ranked no. 4 last year in preseason despite losing Conor Shaw and Clowney and other good players. our roster is clearly better than that team's roster last year yet were only ranked 15 or so.
Bro, you guys play in the ACC. Your accomplishments don't mean shite. ACC < Big 10 < Pac 12/Big 12 < SEC
Posted on 10/8/15 at 12:14 pm to genro
quote:
You just said Clemson was elite because of high expectations, you fricktard. Which is it?
I don't see the contradiction. I'm saying we are underated (meaning ranked lower than reality in preseason) and people have high expectations for our team even though we are generally not ranked in top 10.
how many programs not typically in top 10 in preseason get mocked when they lose? lol Clemson is the only one. :)
This post was edited on 10/8/15 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 10/8/15 at 12:14 pm to KCM0Tiger
quote:
Boy, you best take that back
Posted on 10/8/15 at 12:16 pm to Kamikaze25
quote:
Bro, you guys play in the ACC. Your accomplishments don't mean shite. ACC < Big 10 < Pac 12/Big 12 < SEC
I would argue any conference with FSU is the toughest to win, when FSU has a viable coach.
Posted on 10/8/15 at 12:17 pm to Jamie Lannister
quote:Clearly they don't, or you wouldn't be underrated. Or are you just talking about your fans? Elite just means your fans think you should win? Lol. Wow. Such unique.
I'm saying we are underated (meaning ranked lower than reality in preseason) and people have high expectations for our team even though we are generally not ranked in top 10.
quote:All of them. Clemson just does it a lot so it's become a thing.
ow many programs not typically in top 10 in preseason get mocked when they lose? lol Clemson is the only one. :)
Newsflash: elite is about winning championships and being consistently top tier.
This post was edited on 10/8/15 at 12:19 pm
Posted on 10/8/15 at 12:18 pm to Cheese Grits
quote:
Mascot with a penchant for weed
Heyyyy
Posted on 10/8/15 at 12:21 pm to Jamie Lannister
That's the only competition there is in the ACC. GT is solid... who's next? Duke? Christ... There are like 8 teams that would routinely compete for the ACC championship...
Posted on 10/8/15 at 12:21 pm to genro
quote:
Such unique. quote:ow many programs not typically in top 10 in preseason get mocked when they lose? lol Clemson is the only one. :) All of them. Clemson just does it a lot so it's become a thing. Newsflash: elite is about winning championships and being consistently top tier.
I think Clemson in recent years. has been consistently better than most SEC programs with exception of Alabama.
UGA is considered 'elite', but last champinionsship was 80 or 82, Clemson won it in 81. Auburn only has 1 recent title, with a QB who could have won a title for like 20 other programs.
Clemson is underranked b/c of SEC bias that has like the whole conference in the top 25 in the preseason.
This post was edited on 10/8/15 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 10/8/15 at 12:22 pm to Jamie Lannister
quote:No.
UGA is considered 'elite',
Posted on 10/8/15 at 12:23 pm to Kamikaze25
quote:
That's the only competition there is in the ACC. GT is solid... who's next? Duke? Christ... There are like 8 teams that would routinely compete for the ACC championship...
missouri would lose a lot in ACC, your offense is always pretty bad.
the SEC east has been weak the past few years which is only reason MIzzou could win it.
This post was edited on 10/8/15 at 12:24 pm
Posted on 10/8/15 at 12:23 pm to TJGator1215
Since joining the SEC, Missouri has played Alabama, Auburn and LSU three times total. Two of those three times were in the SEC Championship game. Neither Auburn nor LSU have played them in conference, and Bama only once.
Now *that* is quite a bit of scheduling luck.
Oh... Missouri is 0-3 in those games.
Now *that* is quite a bit of scheduling luck.
Oh... Missouri is 0-3 in those games.
Posted on 10/8/15 at 12:24 pm to genro
quote:
UGA is considered 'elite',No.
UGA is consistently referred to one of SEC's big six on here.
I think elite means you can see a certain program winning a national title. It is a possibility. And it is possible at Clemson.
I think Clemson would have won 1 recently if FSU was not in our conference, or even our division.
This post was edited on 10/8/15 at 12:27 pm
Posted on 10/8/15 at 12:25 pm to Jamie Lannister
quote:You're like a two year old. My program expected to be mediocre as usual? Must be those meanies in the media
Clemson is underranked b/c of SEC bias
Posted on 10/8/15 at 12:27 pm to Jamie Lannister
quote:Being Big 6 in the SEC makes you elite?
UGA is consistently referred to one of SEC's big six on here.
That's the best part about these arguments, you expose the fact that deep down you know the SEC is much better
Posted on 10/8/15 at 12:27 pm to genro
quote:
You're like a two year old. My program expected to be mediocre as usual? Must be those meanies in the media
SEC bias is pretty real. SC ranked 4 last year is case in point b/c they had lost their 'stars' from the previous year.
TN this year was ranked highly despite being 6-6 last year. no ACC team could be ranked that highly after a mediocre season with no real big wins.
This post was edited on 10/8/15 at 12:28 pm
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News