Started By
Message
re: What happens when these laws to allow players to get paid collides with Title IX?
Posted on 10/1/19 at 9:56 am to GatorBait24
Posted on 10/1/19 at 9:56 am to GatorBait24
quote:
The athletes won’t be getting paid from the school
You’ve never seen a school use a player’s likeness? You see current players featured on all sorts of things from posters, programs, banners, even tickets.
This post was edited on 10/1/19 at 9:57 am
1
Posted on 10/1/19 at 9:58 am to GatorBait24
quote:
Not how it’s going to work. They won’t get paid for being in a school football program.
Why do you think they won’t get paid? The law says they’re to get paid for using their likeness.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 9:58 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
You’ve never seen a school use a player’s likeness? You see current players festoon all sorts of things from posters, programs, banners, even tickets.
This is for specifically 3rd party’s, schools will not have to pay for there players likeness.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 9:58 am to Darth_Vader
Here’s what will happen. Quarterback or Running Back walks into the locker room wearing a Rolex and bragging about his new ride to the team. Couple of offensive lineman look at each other and say screw them aholes, let’s see how they do without any blocking Saturday.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 9:59 am to GatorBait24
quote:
Profiting from your likeness has no effect on title 9. The athletes won’t be getting paid from the school, it will be from 3rd party’s. Literally just like it is now just above board. If the school isn’t giving money title 9 doesn’t matter.
Are you guys really that naive? Assuming you are correct which I don't fully agree with, you do realize we are just talking about a bunch of arbitrary rules made up by adult D&D government role players. They make these rules up as they go along yet you guys cite them as if they were in the bill or rights.
The second enough "marginalized" athletes get together to complain about the disproportionate distribution of payments these same government fools will make enact Title 9.4563 to cover this loophole.
There a no winners in the victim olympics. Everything is just destroyed.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 9:59 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
Why do you think they won’t get paid? The law says they’re to get paid for using their likeness
There is also a bylaw that says the school already owns likeness with scholarship. This is for 3rd party’s I don’t understand why this is so difficult.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:00 am to GatorBait24
quote:
This is for specifically 3rd party’s, schools will not have to pay for there players likeness.
Is there wording in the law that says as much?
And even if there is, do you think for one minute female athletes won’t sue these 3rd parties for equal pay?
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:00 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
What happens when college football players are allowed to make money off their likeness and then the women’s field hockey team or whatever demands their players receive the same amount of money?
Is there a big market for women's field hockey video games?
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:00 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
What happens when these laws to allow players to get paid collides with Title IX?
There will be lawsuits after lawsuits until people drop the idea of paying players. The idea is great in principal but there isn't anyway to equal that particular playing field.
The only idea I've seen that realistically makes sense is paying players a portion of the gate in the event of a sellout (or when capacity reaches a certain percentage).
This post was edited on 10/1/19 at 10:02 am
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:00 am to DivePlay
quote:
There a no winners in the victim olympics. Everything is just destroyed.
I think some of you guys are just terrified of change.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:02 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
And even if there is, do you think for one minute female athletes won’t sue these 3rd parties for equal pay?
They can’t this is capitalism, you are worth what someone is willing to pay you. Just like real life.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:02 am to Darth_Vader
It’ll all fade into obscurity when the same politicians pushing this stuff realize that it would in essence destroy Title IX.
They’re posturing now for political points during election season. Once the women’s rights people figure out what’s going on, all this nonsense will stop with the quickness.
They’re posturing now for political points during election season. Once the women’s rights people figure out what’s going on, all this nonsense will stop with the quickness.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:03 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
Why do you think they won’t get paid? The law says they’re to get paid for using their likeness.
For 3rd party’s not the schools they already own likeness with scholarship offer. Stop shitting yourself guys it’s going to be okay I promise.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:03 am to GatorBait24
quote:
I think some of you guys are just terrified of change.
Oh here we go...it is prooooogressssssss.
Fools making the change does terrify me yes. Change does not automatically mean correct or improvement.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:04 am to Dawgy49
quote:
Here’s what will happen. Quarterback or Running Back walks into the locker room wearing a Rolex and bragging about his new ride to the team. Couple of offensive lineman look at each other and say screw them aholes, let’s see how they do without any blocking Saturday
This is dumb. It didn’t happen at Oklahoma when Kyler got millions from his baseball contract. He won a damn heisman. These players want the opportunity to make money.
This post was edited on 10/1/19 at 10:12 am
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:04 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
Is there wording in the law that says as much?
As I said before, you simply write a clause into the financial aid agreement that allows the school to use the players likeness. The compensation for that use is the scholarship and the cost of living payments that the schools pay the players. Both parties sign and agree. Basic contract law. Open and shut.
Furthemore, the players receive free meals, books, health care, access to the strength and conditioning programs, etc, etc that all could be considered compensation.
This post was edited on 10/1/19 at 10:07 am
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:05 am to GatorBait24
Do these new laws say a player cannot be paid by the school? If the school is making money off of the players likeness, then why shouldn't they get paid by the school?
I haven't read the new laws, but does it say the school itself cannot pay them? What about private schools?
I haven't read the new laws, but does it say the school itself cannot pay them? What about private schools?
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:05 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
But that won’t stop them from suing
But who are they going to sue?
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:05 am to GatorBait24
quote:
They can’t this is capitalism, you are worth what someone is willing to pay you. Just like real life.
AHAHAHA...oh my sweet, innocent, child.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:06 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
And even if there is, do you think for one minute female athletes won’t sue these 3rd parties for equal pay?
How can you possibly expect to win a lawsuit demanding money for performing nothing? They would only have a leg to stand on if the 3rd parties used their likeness and did not pay them a comparable amount of money... Even then though, I would imagine the amount of money was negotiated and agreed upon in a contract beforehand.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News