Started By
Message
re: We should all go on the record with our Oklahoma versus Texas score predictions
Posted on 10/10/25 at 6:53 am to menu2
Posted on 10/10/25 at 6:53 am to menu2
quote:
I had no idea playing for the conference title and making runs in the CFP each of the last 2 years was “treading water”
Lmao what a cuck. He is better than the last two (thanks to nil) so we should be thankful haha.
He beat no elite teams last season. 0-3 vs top 10 with a veteran ol, 3rd year qb, and a team full of nfl draft picks. Lmao
You can believe all you want, but we will see who is right in the end.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 7:01 am to Old Sarge
Texas wins easily.
Y’all hating.
Y’all hating.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 7:29 am to SECCaptain
quote:
Having said that, betting a rivalry game that's the biggest game for both teams all year is stupid. It's borderline unpredictable
This - so much this.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 8:26 am to BigSneezy
quote:
Texas wins easily.
The argument for Texas winning: OU has only played 1 game away from home and that was against Temple. They haven't faced real adversity yet. They are risking their season by playing a still healing Mateer (who is their only functional runnning game) and the team will feel defalted if/when he leaves the game because of injury. Texas doubled up the rushing total of Ohio State and will beat OU if that happens on Saturday.
The argument for OU winning: Texas has a mentally unstable QB who is still struggling to hit wide open receivers. The Texas running game looks subpar and no WR on the roster seems capable of making big plays. The Texas d-line looks vulnerable and Sark can't call plays in the red zone to save his life. If Mateer plays all 4 quarters, this is likely a double digit okie win.
Personally, I think the argument for OU is more compelling. If Mateer gets hurt in the first half, I would (maybe) lean Texas.
This post was edited on 10/10/25 at 8:28 am
Posted on 10/10/25 at 8:37 am to Whentheleveebreaks
quote:So Texas should have lost to the other ranked teams they played so they could stay ranked? Genius.
Georgia was the only team Texas played in the regular season last year that finished ranked. And we know how that game went. You should extend Sark.
Also, playoff victories don’t matter anymore? That’s new…
Posted on 10/10/25 at 8:39 am to hookem33
quote:Im a cuck because I like winning? Why are you acting like he’s lost 6 games every year?
Lmao what a cuck. He is better than the last two (thanks to nil) so we should be thankful haha.
quote:He lost to two teams that had more draft picks. They also ran the table against everyone else they were supposed to and beat two different power conference champions along the way. I’d say that counts for something…
He beat no elite teams last season. 0-3 vs top 10 with a veteran ol, 3rd year qb, and a team full of nfl draft picks. Lmao
We get it dude: Sarkisian fricked your wife and now you hate him
Posted on 10/10/25 at 8:42 am to Old Sarge
I think it will be a low scoring game for sure. Just think about it, one team will have a handicap at QB and the other team is Oklahoma with a hurt QB.
OU - 20 Utrans - 16
OU - 20 Utrans - 16
Posted on 10/10/25 at 8:47 am to menu2
quote:
We get it dude: Sarkisian fricked your wife and now you hate him
lol @ you for thinking hookem33 is heterosexual.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 8:51 am to menu2
pooor xwing/.../menu2
I figured you had run off again after that beat down by the gators. I thought Archie, you know, the namesake for your previous alter, was actually looking a little better.
Cute the way you and other UTrans posters are arguing over Sark. I think it is pretty obvious to everyone that Ewers and others were carrying this team and Sark has no idea how to recruit for the future.
I have enjoyed A&M having the season that UTrans wished they were having.
Have you come up with your new alter yet? I am sure after Chokelahoma gives the donghorns a beat down this Saturday, that you will disappear for a few months from pure butt hurt then resurface before baseball season under a new alter.

I figured you had run off again after that beat down by the gators. I thought Archie, you know, the namesake for your previous alter, was actually looking a little better.
Cute the way you and other UTrans posters are arguing over Sark. I think it is pretty obvious to everyone that Ewers and others were carrying this team and Sark has no idea how to recruit for the future.
I have enjoyed A&M having the season that UTrans wished they were having.
Have you come up with your new alter yet? I am sure after Chokelahoma gives the donghorns a beat down this Saturday, that you will disappear for a few months from pure butt hurt then resurface before baseball season under a new alter.

This post was edited on 10/10/25 at 8:58 am
Posted on 10/10/25 at 8:52 am to SOBMarcus
quote:
Chips are down, Texas 27, 0U 23
Confidence level 3 out of 10
No way there are that many points.
OU 8
TX 4
OU gets a interception return for a TD. Then fumbles the 2pt conversion with a lineman recovering in the endzone.
TX gets two safeties.
Awesome D. Garbage O
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:05 am to Buster83
quote:Arch was named menu?
I figured you had run off again after that beat down by the gators. I thought Archie, you know, the namesake for your previous alter, was actually looking a little better.
Every time you post one of these essays I’m so conflicted. On the one hand, I’m proud of you withholding the urge to unload your dildo photo collection
On the other hand, I have simply no idea what you’re talking about
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:09 am to menu2
quote:
He lost to two teams that had more draft picks. They also ran the table against everyone else they were supposed to and beat two different power conference champions along the way. I’d say that counts for something…
We get it dude: Sarkisian fricked your wife and now you hate him
Imagine needing to bring up my wife because you couldn’t argue against 0-3 vs top 10. Congrats, you’ve officially transitioned from ‘football discussion’ to ‘horns-up fan fiction.’ Let me know when Sark beats somebody elite or when you learn how to debate without deflection.
again, we'll see who's right in the end. I'm sure you'll disappear, however.
This post was edited on 10/10/25 at 9:12 am
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:11 am to hookem33
When have I ever done that?
My god dude, get a grip. I’ve never met a fan who goes out of their way to hate their own team just to get other fanbases’ approval on a message board.
Sark clearly fricked your sister (obviously not wife; as the other poster said you’re clearly a homosexual)
My god dude, get a grip. I’ve never met a fan who goes out of their way to hate their own team just to get other fanbases’ approval on a message board.
Sark clearly fricked your sister (obviously not wife; as the other poster said you’re clearly a homosexual)
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:13 am to menu2
quote:
When have I ever done that?
My god dude, get a grip. I’ve never met a fan who goes out of their way to hate their own team just to get other fanbases’ approval on a message board.
Sark clearly fricked your sister (obviously not wife; as the other poster said you’re clearly a homosexual)
again, you can't debate facts so you resort to your inner 12 year old.
0-3 vs top 10 with a loaded and elite team of veterans
5-13 all time vs top 10.
He’s good, not great. He recruits well, but elite coaching is defined by beating elite opponents and winning when it matters. Until he proves otherwise, he’s Mark Richt with better PR.
Career Record: ~70–50 (.580 win rate). that’s Kevin Sumlin territory, not Saban/Kirby/Dabo.
Record vs Top Competition:
• 1–7 vs Top 5 teams
• Around 5-13 vs Top 10 teams
• Overall losing record vs ranked teams
Elite coaches don’t consistently get worked by elite teams.
Championship Resume:
• 0 Playoff wins
• 0 National Titles
• Took 10 years as a head coach just to win a single conference championship
Blue-Blood Resume:
• Fired from USC mid-season in a weak Pac-12
• Only now succeeding thanks to Top 5 recruiting classes + NIL advantages
So no, beating the teams you’re supposed to beat doesn’t make you elite. It makes you competent. Until he starts actually beating Top 10 teams and winning playoff games against elite competition, he’s not on the Kirby/Saban/Dabo tier.
Why can't you argue stats? I think we both know.
All the deflecting and insults in the world doesn't change the fact that the guy is fraud. Keep up with the insults. That'll just make my being right that much sweeter.
Not that you'll stick around in a few years when he's fired. I know your type. Hit and run when you lose
This post was edited on 10/10/25 at 9:22 am
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:17 am to Old Sarge
OU 24
tu 13
OU gets a defensive touchdown of some sort and Jesus Manning will be sacked many times
tu 13
OU gets a defensive touchdown of some sort and Jesus Manning will be sacked many times
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:23 am to hookem33
quote:so by the same metric, if Georgia lost to Texas one time last year, Kirby should have been on the hot seat? Great logic there
0-3 vs top 10 with a loaded and elite team of veterans
I also highly doubt Sarkisian has played 18 top 10 teams since taking the job in 2021
quote:you do realize there’s only one national champion per year, right? So is every coach that hasn’t won a title yet mediocre?
He’s good, not great. He recruits well, but elite coaching is defined by beating elite opponents and winning when it matters. Until he proves otherwise, he’s Mark Richt with better PR.
I’ll wait for the mark eight comparisons after Sarkisian has been here more than 4 years.
quote:Bahahaha you called me a cuck in your last post. Dont be such a pussy and dish it while being unable to take it
All the deflecting and insults in the world doesn't change the fact that the guy is fraud. Keep up with the insults. That'll just make my being right that much sweeter.
Take a deep breath, squirt. You’re utterly melting down on an anonymous message board lol
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:25 am to menu2
quote:
so by the same metric, if Georgia lost to Texas one time last year, Kirby should have been on the hot seat? Great logic there
Kirby has a title, dipshit.
he's also 18-6 vs top 10 teams. More of that pesky data you hate so much.
quote:
I also highly doubt Sarkisian has played 18 top 10 teams since taking the job in 2021
That's all time as a head coach
quote:
Take a deep breath, squirt. You’re utterly melting down on an anonymous message board lol
again, we'll see who's right. I still have yet to see you back your claim that he's an elite coach. Show me the data? You seem to be the one melting in the face of statistics that prove my point. Why haven't you done the same to prove yours?
This post was edited on 10/10/25 at 9:27 am
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:29 am to hookem33
quote:so everyone without a title is mediocre and hopeless unless they win the national title that year. Got it.
Kirby has a title, dipshit.
quote:Ah I forgot that we look at Saban and his time at Michigan State when looking at his career. Should’ve thought of the Spartans first
That's all time as a head coach
Actually, why do we ever give Jim Tressel any credit for being a good coach. Did he ever beat a top ten team at Youngstown State?
quote:Id say 25 wins in his 3rd and 4th year after taking over a program in shambles makes me think he’s got what it takes
I still have yet to see you back your claim that he's an elite coach. Show me the data?
But he fricked your soster, so I understand why you’re upset
Melt for me, squirt
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:32 am to menu2
quote:
But he fricked your soster, so I understand why you’re upset
lmao you are such a child. Priceless.
we'll talk again in a few years. I can't wait
Data, the enemy of hyperbole.
This post was edited on 10/10/25 at 9:33 am
Popular
Back to top


1






