Started By
Message
Watching World Cup last night
Posted on 7/3/26 at 11:08 am
Posted on 7/3/26 at 11:08 am
Near the end with the Croatia goal/not goal scenario, it was stated that FIFA uses an “IMU sensors housed within the Trionda ball are capable of determining any slight contact, and exact location, displayed to viewers in the broadcast as a 'heartbeat graphic', and allowing officials an unprecedented level of data to make fast, accurate decisions. This is also used to determine exact location of the ball as it pertains to who may be offsides”
Why doesn’t the NFL of CFB this, instead our the imaginary line?
Why doesn’t the NFL of CFB this, instead our the imaginary line?
3
Posted on 7/3/26 at 11:12 am to RTRnFlorida
ive been trying to watch, but every time i see a goal scored, they are offsides by a pubic hair.
Posted on 7/3/26 at 11:17 am to RTRnFlorida
Been saying that same thing for years. Also, put sensors on the pylons facing each other (think garage door sensor mentality) with 2 sensors on each end of the football.
Boom
Boom
Posted on 7/3/26 at 11:22 am to Warwick
quote:Same. I really wanted to get into and appreciate soccer because there were really cool goals scored on both sides but they just erase them like its nothing. Really weird for the sport, you'd think they'd want more action but I guess soccer is already extremely popular all over the world so I guess they arent worried about it...
scored, they are offsides by a pubic hair.
Posted on 7/3/26 at 11:40 am to Pipes9870slu
its ludicrous when you consider they allow a fouled player to play on if he still has possession (because of the advantage), but conversely negate goals over minute technicalities like offsides, even though its plain as day it wouldn't have affected the outcome of the play.
in american football, if the ball isn't catchable, the pass interference is irrelevant. Why soccer doesn't follow the same principle with offsides is a farce.
in american football, if the ball isn't catchable, the pass interference is irrelevant. Why soccer doesn't follow the same principle with offsides is a farce.
Posted on 7/3/26 at 11:48 am to RTRnFlorida
Technology giveth and taketh away. Pros and cons.
Using an CGI generated image to justify a player being offside by a toenail is frustrating.
Because with CGI they can just enlarge or shrink the foot image if desired.
Using an CGI generated image to justify a player being offside by a toenail is frustrating.
Because with CGI they can just enlarge or shrink the foot image if desired.
Posted on 7/3/26 at 12:04 pm to Warwick
Its the same thing a declining a penalty. If you stop they will blow the whistle and you take the foul.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News