Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/3/23 at 5:20 pm to Weagle25
It’s because Texas would bitch louder if Bama got in and they didn’t.
So they decided to deal with FSU bitching instead.
So they decided to deal with FSU bitching instead.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 5:22 pm to Weagle25
Texas didn’t do anything new, but Bama winning the SEC suddenly made their signature win look a lot better.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 5:26 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Michigan 3-0 vTop25 + Conference Title (+H2H Ohio State)
Washington 4-0 vTop25 + Conference Title
Texas 3-1 vTop25 + Conference Title (+H2H Alabama)
Alabama 4-1 vTop25 + Conference Title (+H2H Georgia)
FSU 3-0 vTop25 + Conference Title
Georgia 3-1 vTop25
Ohio State 2-1 vTop25
There is some logic to the committee’s rankings if you don’t just fixate on one resume point, even with just the very basic resume aspects above.
The spot where one may better argue they got it out of order is Michigan at #1.
Washington 4-0 vTop25 + Conference Title
Texas 3-1 vTop25 + Conference Title (+H2H Alabama)
Alabama 4-1 vTop25 + Conference Title (+H2H Georgia)
FSU 3-0 vTop25 + Conference Title
Georgia 3-1 vTop25
Ohio State 2-1 vTop25
There is some logic to the committee’s rankings if you don’t just fixate on one resume point, even with just the very basic resume aspects above.
The spot where one may better argue they got it out of order is Michigan at #1.
This post was edited on 12/3/23 at 5:42 pm
Posted on 12/3/23 at 5:29 pm to wm72
quote:
There is some logic to the committee’s rankings if you don’t just fixate on one resume point, even with just the very basic resume aspects above.
What you just listed has FSU with literally the same resume as Michigan and better than Texas. Yet you say FSU at 5 makes sense?
Posted on 12/3/23 at 5:32 pm to Weagle25
quote:
What you just listed has FSU with literally the same resume as Michigan
And when you look at it more you realize 2 of the Top 25 wins are Iowa and Penn State, and those 2 teams have zero quality wins themselves.
Michigans entire resume is they killed bad teams and beat Ohio State. And beating Ohio State is a big deal, they're an elite team, but boy did Michigan get some serious benefit of the doubt that they were clearly the other great team besides Georgia with a resume that is all-time soft.
This post was edited on 12/3/23 at 5:34 pm
Posted on 12/3/23 at 5:34 pm to Weagle25
tu riding Bama's coattails.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 5:35 pm to Weagle25
quote:
What’s the excuse given to jump Texas over FSU?
Posted on 12/3/23 at 5:36 pm to Prof
quote:
You have the right of it. Everyone's focused on BAMA but it's Texas that jumped FSU without much reason given. And it's obvious as to why -- tv dollars.
So much butthurt. Almost brings a tear to my eye.
This post was edited on 12/3/23 at 5:37 pm
Posted on 12/3/23 at 5:37 pm to Krampus
Poor Aggies. Just not a good day for them.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 5:37 pm to geoag58
quote:
tu riding Bama's coattails.
Thanks, Bama!
Posted on 12/3/23 at 5:37 pm to Weagle25
quote:
What you just listed has FSU with literally the same resume as Michigan and better than Texas. Yet you say FSU at 5 makes sense?
Good point. Michigan's resume is a bit more questionable than Alabama or Texas. But they do have the Top10 Ohio St and Penn St wins whereas FSU is the only team in contention without a real signature win.
This post was edited on 12/3/23 at 5:41 pm
Posted on 12/3/23 at 5:39 pm to Weagle25
Because they are the 4 best team . Lol
Posted on 12/3/23 at 5:55 pm to Che Boludo
quote:
I think Washington has a top 10 SoS.
Wash played 3 ranked teams ( as of today's AP poll)
FSU played 3 ranked teams (as of today's AP poll)
Wash is #2. FSU is trash.
Why?
Posted on 12/3/23 at 5:58 pm to Weagle25
quote:
Because Texas gets in anyway. Bama is the one that would’ve been left out
So why the frick did you start a thread asking for an explanation about Texas?
Posted on 12/3/23 at 5:59 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Wash played 3 ranked teams ( as of today's AP poll)
Count again, and this time use what matters (the CFP).
Posted on 12/3/23 at 6:01 pm to Weagle25
quote:
Because Texas gets in anyway. Bama is the one that would’ve been left out
We’ll never know for sure, but I think if UGA had won, FSU stays ahead of Texas. Because Bama won, the only way to get them in was to also include Texas.
There is literally nothing that supports Texas jumping. Beating Bama wasn’t worth a jump earlier, and wins over Texas Tech and Ok. st. sure as heck don’t warrant it.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 6:02 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Agreed. And aside from myself, I haven't seen anyone talking about Washington being somehow guaranteed a spot for being undefeated when FSU had the better schedule with the same record.
FSU didn’t have an Ohio State type win nor two Oregon type wins and also Michigan/Washington have their QBs healthy too.
This post was edited on 12/3/23 at 6:03 pm
Posted on 12/3/23 at 6:03 pm to deeprig9
quote:that's it
Because Alabama beat Georgia, so Bama gets in. But Texas beat Alabama, so Texas has to get in too. That seems to be the only logic that explains the results.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News