Started By
Message

UPDATED 2018: Stats on WG's annual predictions thread - fanbase expectations
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:47 pm
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:47 pm
Because I have way too much time on my hands, I went through and logged every fanbase's season predictions from WG_Dawg's annual thread, compared it to that team's actual result to see how realistic or unrealistic all the fans on this site are.
In short: We (almost) all overestimate our teams going in.
Here's how it shakes out (fan predictions listed first, actual result in parentheses)(correctly predicted seasons in italics, overestimated seasons in bold):
Alabama:
2011: 11-1 (11-1) correct
2012: 11-1 (11-1) correct
2013: 12-0 (11-1) overestimated
2014: 11-1 (11-1) correct
2015: 11-1 (11-1) correct
2016: 11-1 (12-0) underestimated
2017: 11-1 (11-1) correct
2018: 11.5-0.5 ()
Predicted wins match actual wins. 1 overestimation, 1 underestimation, 5 correct predictions.
Arkansas:
2011: 10-2 (10-2) correct
2012: 9.5-2.5 (4-8) overestimated
2013: 6-6 (3-9) overestimated
2014: 6-6 (6-6) correct
2015: 9-3 (7-5) overestimated
2016: 8-4 (7-5) overestimated
2017: 4-8 (8-4) overestimated
2018: 6-6 ()
Predicted wins 15.5 more than actual wins. 5 overestimations, 0 underestimations, 2 correct predictions.
Auburn:
2011: 8-4 (7-5) overestimated
2012: 8.5-3.5 (3-9) overestimated
2013: 8-4 (11-1) underestimated
2014: 10.5-1.5 (8-4) overestimated
2015: 10.5-1.5 (6-6) overestimated
2016: 7-5 (8-4) underestimated
2017: 10-2 (10-2) correct
2018: 9.5-2.5 ()
Predicted wins 9.5 more than actual wins. 4 overestimations, 2 underestimations, 1 correct prediction.
Florida:
2011: 8-4 (6-6) overestimated
2012: 8-4 (11-1) underestimated
2013: 9.5-2.5 (4-8) overestimated
2014: 9.5-2.5 (6-5) overestimated
2015: 7.5-4.5 (10-2) underestimated
2016: 9-3 (9-3) correct
2017: 9-3 (4-7) overestimated
2018: 7.5-4.5 ()
Predicted wins 9.5 more than actual wins (giving Gators slack here on the cancelled 2017 N. Colorado game). 4 overestimations, 2 underestimations, 1 correct prediction.
Georgia:
2011: 9.5-2.5 (10-2) underestimated
2012: 11-1 (11-1) correct
2013: 11-1 (8-4) overestimated
2014: 10-2 (9-3) overestimated
2015: 10-2 (9-3) overestimated
2016: 9-3 (7-5) overestimated
2017: 9-3 (11-1) underestimated
2018: 11-1 ()
Predicted wins 4.5 more than actual wins. 4 overestimations, 2 underestimations, 1 correct prediction.
Kentucky:
2011: 6.5-5.5 (5-7) overestimated
2012: no predictions made :/
2013: 4.5-7.5 (2-10) overestimated
2014: 5-7 (5-7) correct
2015: 7-5 (5-7) overestimated
2016: 6-6 (7-5) underestimated
2017: 8-4 (7-5) overestimated
2018: 7.5-4.5 ()
Predicted wins 6 more than actual wins. 4 overestimations, 1 underestimation, 1 correct prediction.
LSU:
2011: 10.5-1.5 (12-0) underestimated
2012: 12-0 (10-2) overestimated
2013: 10-2 (9-3) overestimated
2014: 10-2 (8-4) overestimated
2015: 10-2 (9-3) overestimated
2016: 11-1 (8-4) overestimated
2017: 10-2 (9-3) overestimated
2018: 9-3 ()
Predicted wins 8.5 more than actual wins. 6 overestiations, 1 underestimation, 0 correct predictions.
Ole Miss:
2011: 6-6 (3-9) overestimated
2012: 4.5-7.5 (6-6) underestimated
2013: 8-4 (8-4) correct
2014: 9-3 (9-3) correct
2015: 9-3 (9-3) correct
2016: 9-3 (5-7) overestimated
2017: 6.5-5.5 (6-6) overestimated
2018: 6.5-5.5 ()
Predicted wins 6 more than actual wins. 3 overestimations, 1 underestimation, 3 correct predictions.
Mississippi State:
2011: 9-3 (6-6) overestimated
2012: 8.5-3.5 (8-4) overestimated
2013: 6.5-5.5 (6-6) overestimated
2014: 9-3 (10-2) underestimated
2015: 10-2 (8-4) overestimated
2016: 7-5 (5-7) overestimated
2017: 8-4 (8-4) correct
2018: 9.5-2.5 ()
Predicted wins 7 more than actual wins. 5 overestimations, 1 underestimation, 1 correct prediction.
Missouri:
2012: 7.5-4.5 (5-7) overestimated
2013: 7.5-4.5 (11-1) underestimated
2014: 10-2 (10-2) correct
2015: 9-3 (7-5) overestimated
2016: 7-5 (4-8) overestimated
2017: 8-4 (7-5) overestimated
2018: 8-4 ()
Predicted wins 5 more than actual wins. 4 overestimations, 1 underestimation, 1 correct prediction.
South Carolina:
2011: 10.5-1.5 (10-2) overestimated
2012: 11-1 (10-2) overestimated
2013: 11-1 (10-2) overestimated
2014: 10.5-1.5 (6-6) overestimated
2015: 8.5-3.5 (3-9) overestimated
2016: 6-6(6-6) correct
2017: 7.5-4.5 (8-4) underestimated
2018: 8.5-3.5 ()
Predicted wins 12. more than actual wins. 5 overestimations, 1 underestimation, 1 correct prediction.
Tennessee:
2011: 7.5-4.5 (5-7) overestimated
2012: 8.5-3.5 (5-7) overestimated
2013: 7-5 (5-7) overestimated
2014: 6.5-5.5 (6-6) overestimated
2015: 9-3 (8-4) overestimated
2016: 10.5-1.5 (8-4) overestimated
2017: 9-3 (4-8) overestimated
2018: 6-6 ()
Predicted wins 17 more than actual wins. Every season overestimated.
Texas A&M:
2012: 8-4 (10-2) underestimated
2013: 10-2 (8-4) overestimated
2014: 8.5-3.5 (7-5) overestimated
2015: 10-2 (8-4) overestimated
2016: 9-3 (8-4) overestimated
2017: 7-5 (7-5) correct
2018: 7.5-4.5 ()
Predicted wins 4.5 more than actual wins. 4 overestimations, 1 underestimation, 1 correct prediction.
Vanderbilt:
2011: 5-7 (6-6) underestimated
2012: 7-5 (8-4) underestimated
2013: 7.5-4.5 (8-4) underestimated
2014: 8-4 (3-9) overestimated
2015: 5-7 (4-8) overestimated
2016: 5-7 (6-6) underestimated
2017: 7-5 (5-7) overestimated
2018: 6.5-5.5 ()
Predicted wins 4.5 more than actual wins. 3 overestimations, 4 underestimations, 0 correct predictions.
Most predicted wins more actual wins overall:
1. Tennessee - 17
2. Arkansas - 15.5
3. South Carolina - 12
t4. Auburn - 9.5
t4. Florida - 9.5
6. LSU - 8.5
7. Mississippi State - 7
t8. Kentucky - 6
t8. Ole Miss - 6
10. Missouri - 5
t11. Georgia - 4.5
t11. Texas A&M - 4.5
t11. Vanderbilt - 4.5
14. Alabama - 0
*Per year numbers and worst predictions ever can be found on my Page 3 post.
These numbers updated as of 8/7/18
LINK to 2018 predictions thread
In short: We (almost) all overestimate our teams going in.
Here's how it shakes out (fan predictions listed first, actual result in parentheses)(correctly predicted seasons in italics, overestimated seasons in bold):
Alabama:
2011: 11-1 (11-1) correct
2012: 11-1 (11-1) correct
2013: 12-0 (11-1) overestimated
2014: 11-1 (11-1) correct
2015: 11-1 (11-1) correct
2016: 11-1 (12-0) underestimated
2017: 11-1 (11-1) correct
2018: 11.5-0.5 ()
Predicted wins match actual wins. 1 overestimation, 1 underestimation, 5 correct predictions.
Arkansas:
2011: 10-2 (10-2) correct
2012: 9.5-2.5 (4-8) overestimated
2013: 6-6 (3-9) overestimated
2014: 6-6 (6-6) correct
2015: 9-3 (7-5) overestimated
2016: 8-4 (7-5) overestimated
2017: 4-8 (8-4) overestimated
2018: 6-6 ()
Predicted wins 15.5 more than actual wins. 5 overestimations, 0 underestimations, 2 correct predictions.
Auburn:
2011: 8-4 (7-5) overestimated
2012: 8.5-3.5 (3-9) overestimated
2013: 8-4 (11-1) underestimated
2014: 10.5-1.5 (8-4) overestimated
2015: 10.5-1.5 (6-6) overestimated
2016: 7-5 (8-4) underestimated
2017: 10-2 (10-2) correct
2018: 9.5-2.5 ()
Predicted wins 9.5 more than actual wins. 4 overestimations, 2 underestimations, 1 correct prediction.
Florida:
2011: 8-4 (6-6) overestimated
2012: 8-4 (11-1) underestimated
2013: 9.5-2.5 (4-8) overestimated
2014: 9.5-2.5 (6-5) overestimated
2015: 7.5-4.5 (10-2) underestimated
2016: 9-3 (9-3) correct
2017: 9-3 (4-7) overestimated
2018: 7.5-4.5 ()
Predicted wins 9.5 more than actual wins (giving Gators slack here on the cancelled 2017 N. Colorado game). 4 overestimations, 2 underestimations, 1 correct prediction.
Georgia:
2011: 9.5-2.5 (10-2) underestimated
2012: 11-1 (11-1) correct
2013: 11-1 (8-4) overestimated
2014: 10-2 (9-3) overestimated
2015: 10-2 (9-3) overestimated
2016: 9-3 (7-5) overestimated
2017: 9-3 (11-1) underestimated
2018: 11-1 ()
Predicted wins 4.5 more than actual wins. 4 overestimations, 2 underestimations, 1 correct prediction.
Kentucky:
2011: 6.5-5.5 (5-7) overestimated
2012: no predictions made :/
2013: 4.5-7.5 (2-10) overestimated
2014: 5-7 (5-7) correct
2015: 7-5 (5-7) overestimated
2016: 6-6 (7-5) underestimated
2017: 8-4 (7-5) overestimated
2018: 7.5-4.5 ()
Predicted wins 6 more than actual wins. 4 overestimations, 1 underestimation, 1 correct prediction.
LSU:
2011: 10.5-1.5 (12-0) underestimated
2012: 12-0 (10-2) overestimated
2013: 10-2 (9-3) overestimated
2014: 10-2 (8-4) overestimated
2015: 10-2 (9-3) overestimated
2016: 11-1 (8-4) overestimated
2017: 10-2 (9-3) overestimated
2018: 9-3 ()
Predicted wins 8.5 more than actual wins. 6 overestiations, 1 underestimation, 0 correct predictions.
Ole Miss:
2011: 6-6 (3-9) overestimated
2012: 4.5-7.5 (6-6) underestimated
2013: 8-4 (8-4) correct
2014: 9-3 (9-3) correct
2015: 9-3 (9-3) correct
2016: 9-3 (5-7) overestimated
2017: 6.5-5.5 (6-6) overestimated
2018: 6.5-5.5 ()
Predicted wins 6 more than actual wins. 3 overestimations, 1 underestimation, 3 correct predictions.
Mississippi State:
2011: 9-3 (6-6) overestimated
2012: 8.5-3.5 (8-4) overestimated
2013: 6.5-5.5 (6-6) overestimated
2014: 9-3 (10-2) underestimated
2015: 10-2 (8-4) overestimated
2016: 7-5 (5-7) overestimated
2017: 8-4 (8-4) correct
2018: 9.5-2.5 ()
Predicted wins 7 more than actual wins. 5 overestimations, 1 underestimation, 1 correct prediction.
Missouri:
2012: 7.5-4.5 (5-7) overestimated
2013: 7.5-4.5 (11-1) underestimated
2014: 10-2 (10-2) correct
2015: 9-3 (7-5) overestimated
2016: 7-5 (4-8) overestimated
2017: 8-4 (7-5) overestimated
2018: 8-4 ()
Predicted wins 5 more than actual wins. 4 overestimations, 1 underestimation, 1 correct prediction.
South Carolina:
2011: 10.5-1.5 (10-2) overestimated
2012: 11-1 (10-2) overestimated
2013: 11-1 (10-2) overestimated
2014: 10.5-1.5 (6-6) overestimated
2015: 8.5-3.5 (3-9) overestimated
2016: 6-6(6-6) correct
2017: 7.5-4.5 (8-4) underestimated
2018: 8.5-3.5 ()
Predicted wins 12. more than actual wins. 5 overestimations, 1 underestimation, 1 correct prediction.
Tennessee:
2011: 7.5-4.5 (5-7) overestimated
2012: 8.5-3.5 (5-7) overestimated
2013: 7-5 (5-7) overestimated
2014: 6.5-5.5 (6-6) overestimated
2015: 9-3 (8-4) overestimated
2016: 10.5-1.5 (8-4) overestimated
2017: 9-3 (4-8) overestimated
2018: 6-6 ()
Predicted wins 17 more than actual wins. Every season overestimated.
Texas A&M:
2012: 8-4 (10-2) underestimated
2013: 10-2 (8-4) overestimated
2014: 8.5-3.5 (7-5) overestimated
2015: 10-2 (8-4) overestimated
2016: 9-3 (8-4) overestimated
2017: 7-5 (7-5) correct
2018: 7.5-4.5 ()
Predicted wins 4.5 more than actual wins. 4 overestimations, 1 underestimation, 1 correct prediction.
Vanderbilt:
2011: 5-7 (6-6) underestimated
2012: 7-5 (8-4) underestimated
2013: 7.5-4.5 (8-4) underestimated
2014: 8-4 (3-9) overestimated
2015: 5-7 (4-8) overestimated
2016: 5-7 (6-6) underestimated
2017: 7-5 (5-7) overestimated
2018: 6.5-5.5 ()
Predicted wins 4.5 more than actual wins. 3 overestimations, 4 underestimations, 0 correct predictions.
Most predicted wins more actual wins overall:
1. Tennessee - 17
2. Arkansas - 15.5
3. South Carolina - 12
t4. Auburn - 9.5
t4. Florida - 9.5
6. LSU - 8.5
7. Mississippi State - 7
t8. Kentucky - 6
t8. Ole Miss - 6
10. Missouri - 5
t11. Georgia - 4.5
t11. Texas A&M - 4.5
t11. Vanderbilt - 4.5
14. Alabama - 0
*Per year numbers and worst predictions ever can be found on my Page 3 post.
These numbers updated as of 8/7/18
LINK to 2018 predictions thread
This post was edited on 8/7/18 at 4:12 pm
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:49 pm to BranchDawg
A lot of overestimating going for every team.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:53 pm to BranchDawg
O comes after M in alphabetical order.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:53 pm to TTsTowel
You're telling me fans are generally overly optimistic regarding their favorite team?
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:53 pm to BranchDawg
So, despite what everyone on this board actually wants to believe, LSU is not the most delusional fanbase on this site.
Interesting.
Interesting.
This post was edited on 8/3/17 at 7:55 pm
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:54 pm to Sancho Panza
quote:
O comes after M in alphabetical order.
Yeah, yet Ole Miss usually gets listed by that name and listed first. Always been weird to me, but I listed them in the same order WG does.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:58 pm to BranchDawg
Dude, this is borderline rainman status. Holy shite.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:58 pm to BranchDawg
Alot of overestimating, as figured.
This post was edited on 8/3/17 at 8:00 pm
Posted on 8/3/17 at 8:05 pm to BranchDawg
This is...impressive actually.
Bravo for the work.
Also...cocky cocks. They still believe in the Chump too I'd bet.
Bravo for the work.
Also...cocky cocks. They still believe in the Chump too I'd bet.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 8:12 pm to BranchDawg
I remember when the biggest insult opposing fanbases would try to pin on Bama fans was that we were delusional.
My how the tables have turned.
My how the tables have turned.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 8:22 pm to RB10
South Carolina is the most delusional fanbase. Who woulda thought. 

Posted on 8/3/17 at 8:22 pm to RB10
.
This post was edited on 8/3/17 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 8/3/17 at 8:24 pm to BranchDawg
I notice you didn't factor in my predictions for any of those years, so frick u 

Posted on 8/3/17 at 8:25 pm to BranchDawg
Would love to see where you're getting this from because it's no where near what any of us have predicted. We've been spot on.
EDIT: Wait I see where you say you got it from. Link all those threads please. I'd like to see whose predictions you're basing this on.

EDIT: Wait I see where you say you got it from. Link all those threads please. I'd like to see whose predictions you're basing this on.

This post was edited on 8/3/17 at 8:28 pm
Posted on 8/3/17 at 8:26 pm to BranchDawg
Bama cheats. The answer is the same almost every year. It looks like a test the football players get. Just fill out C all the way down and get a 90%. 

Posted on 8/3/17 at 8:26 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
I notice you didn't factor in my predictions for any of those years, so frick u
He got those from "pulled it outta my arse.com."
Posted on 8/3/17 at 8:28 pm to RB10
quote:
So, despite what everyone on this board actually wants to believe, LSU is not the most delusional fanbase on this site.
Just 5 straight over estimations

One behind Tennessee

Posted on 8/3/17 at 8:29 pm to hogNsinceReagan
Only because of 2014 and 2015.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 8:32 pm to CNB
Interesting that he uses a range for us and then take the high end of the range to claim we overestimated. Still want links to check this and see who this is based on. Hmm....
This post was edited on 8/3/17 at 8:33 pm
Posted on 8/3/17 at 8:32 pm to Prof
quote:
EDIT: Wait I see where you say you got it from. Link all those threads please. I'd like to see whose predictions you're basing this on
Serraneaux, Phat Phil, and 5 cajunbama alters.
Popular
Back to top
