Started By
Message
2
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:23 pm to NATidefan
quote:sure, but Arizona St should have been playing Florida State for the title...which would have completely squeezed out Florida...
Yeah, but didnt Arizona state lose their bowl game that year?
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:23 pm to Legend13
... I like fruits and vegetables.
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:24 pm to elposter
You can't discount arbitrarily awarded titles and then include 2007 LSU.
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:24 pm to QuackAttack716
quote:
FWIW LSU did not play the AP no.1 team in 2003.
Original post is dumb.
reading comprehension...you suck at it
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:24 pm to Chicken
Either way is ok with me.
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:24 pm to QuackAttack716
quote:
FWIW LSU did not play the AP no.1 team in 2003.
USC agreed to the process to determine invites.
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:25 pm to stat19
Hell, they've already claimed #16 
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:25 pm to RandySavage
quote:
You can't discount arbitrarily awarded titles and then include 2007 LSU.
The one where LSU was AP/Coaches/FWAA #1?
Keep posting.
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:25 pm to Chicken
How long have you had this one in the chamber clucker?
No way it was just by chance you unleashed this beast on Wednesday of LSU-bama week
No way it was just by chance you unleashed this beast on Wednesday of LSU-bama week
This post was edited on 11/6/13 at 1:27 pm
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:26 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
USC agreed to the process to determine invites.
This argument is so stupid. As if they had a choice.
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:26 pm to Legend13
This gif, I want to thank you for it.
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:26 pm to Evolved Simian
quote:not true...The Bowl Alliance did not include the Pac 10 and Big Ten...
1 vs. 2 started in 1992. Several years before the BCS.
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:26 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:that's not the criteria
The one where LSU was AP/Coaches/FWAA #1?
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:27 pm to RandySavage
There we go.
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:27 pm to NashvilleTider
quote:
66 is too.
quote:I agree...Totally Bogus!
1966 - Both Notre Dame and Michigan State ended the season 9-0-1. They tied each other in the last game of the season, 10-10. Neither played in a bowl game. Notre Dame was awarded the AP and UPI titles. Meanwhile, Alabama finished the season 11-0 and trounced No. 6 Nebraska 34-7 in the Sugar Bowl.
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:27 pm to Chicken
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:28 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:Was talking about 2007 kU in response to the Vol who said they should've played for the title instead of LSU. Not only did they not win their conference, they didn't win their division and avoided playing every good team from the big12 south. Missouri was the only good team they played and they got their beaks kicked in!
In fact, the only good team they played that season was also their only loss.
Are we talking Ohio state or 2011 Bama?
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:29 pm to cas4t
quote:
Sorry for being a butthurt fan after the loss
just sayin
Ain't no thang
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:31 pm to Chicken
quote:
sure, but Arizona St should have been playing Florida State for the title...which would have completely squeezed out Florida...
So even though Florida beat FSU by 32 points and Arizona state lost to Ohio state, Florida wasnt worthy just because voters ranked them lower than they should have been? Yet LSU is worthy in 2007 after losing to Kentucky and Arkansas because voters and computers ranked them number 2.
Voters determine the national champs, always have and most likely always will to some extent. This thread is dumb.
Page 9 of 121
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News