Started By
Message

Transfer portal
Posted on 5/8/25 at 10:05 am
Posted on 5/8/25 at 10:05 am
Curious if most college football/basketball fans think the current transfer situation needs fixing?
I do. Too many kids who attend a different school every year of their college career.
So, here's a suggestion for a new system. Doubt it would fix all the problems, but it would at least add some pain for excessive use of the new transfer rules.
First transfer - free and clear, just like now. Too many coaches lie to get kids to sign on the dotted line. I would like players to have the option to get away from a bad situation if it is the exact opposite of what they were promised. I also think kids should get a chance to move on if the coaching staff they put their trust in is shown the door.
2nd transfer - Both the team and player commit for 2 years. Gotta transfer again? Get it right this time.
3rd transfer - sit out a year before you play, like the old transfer rules.
Probably not the perfect plan, but it forces players to put more skin in the game.
I also think teams having to put up transfer fees (paid to the school the kid is leaving) to bring in new players out of the portal (kind of like Soccer clubs in Europe) would slow things down.
I would like some sort of system to reduce schools treating the Portal like some kind of farm system.
Putting some rule like no NIL deals for the first year at the new school after a transfer would also put a screeching halt to the current transfer craze.
I do. Too many kids who attend a different school every year of their college career.
So, here's a suggestion for a new system. Doubt it would fix all the problems, but it would at least add some pain for excessive use of the new transfer rules.
First transfer - free and clear, just like now. Too many coaches lie to get kids to sign on the dotted line. I would like players to have the option to get away from a bad situation if it is the exact opposite of what they were promised. I also think kids should get a chance to move on if the coaching staff they put their trust in is shown the door.
2nd transfer - Both the team and player commit for 2 years. Gotta transfer again? Get it right this time.
3rd transfer - sit out a year before you play, like the old transfer rules.
Probably not the perfect plan, but it forces players to put more skin in the game.
I also think teams having to put up transfer fees (paid to the school the kid is leaving) to bring in new players out of the portal (kind of like Soccer clubs in Europe) would slow things down.
I would like some sort of system to reduce schools treating the Portal like some kind of farm system.
Putting some rule like no NIL deals for the first year at the new school after a transfer would also put a screeching halt to the current transfer craze.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 10:07 am to Tiger97
quote:
Curious if most college football/basketball fans think the current transfer situation needs fixing?
No you're not.
quote:
I do. Too many kids who attend a different school every year of their college career.
You and everybody else.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 10:52 am to TriStateAreaFootball
if coaches can do whatever they want I would think it would be hard to walk it back again - players should have freedom of movement in college athletics
I have no problems with true NIL and there should be no cap
the problem is the collectives and that's where the change needs to happen and I believe this settlement will impact the collectives with revenue sharing replacing it and that will be more equitable across the board
I have no problems with true NIL and there should be no cap
the problem is the collectives and that's where the change needs to happen and I believe this settlement will impact the collectives with revenue sharing replacing it and that will be more equitable across the board
This post was edited on 5/8/25 at 10:53 am
Posted on 5/8/25 at 11:18 am to Tiger97
No. If everyone was serious about keeping college sports "college," you put a cap on coaching and administrative salaries. Everyone is quick to regulate labor, and gloss over failures of management.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 11:19 am to AUCE05
quote:
No. If everyone was serious about keeping college sports "college," you put a cap on coaching and administrative salaries. Everyone is quick to regulate labor, and gloss over failures of management.
No one disagrees with this. OP just wanted to start a thread.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 11:28 am to nicholastiger
quote:
the problem is the collectives and that's where the change needs to happen and I believe this settlement will impact the collectives with revenue sharing replacing it and that will be more equitable across the board
The collectives won't be impacted, they'll just be rebranded.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 11:29 am to ukraine_rebel
at what point does universities decide to get out of the athletics business altogether
Posted on 5/8/25 at 11:47 am to nicholastiger
quote:
at what point does universities decide to get out of the athletics business altogether
The minute they fail to profit from it.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 12:01 pm to nicholastiger
Probably the national exposure alone that's afforded by having a big-time sports program is reason enough to keep fielding one.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 12:24 pm to nicholastiger
quote:
if coaches can do whatever they want I would think it would be hard to walk it back again - players should have freedom of movement in college athletics
people keep saying this without stating the obvious....coaches sign contracts and have buyout provisions in those contract (liquidated damages) if they or those schools terminate those contracts early, Players do not, so people really need to stop passing the situations off as if they are comparable
Posted on 5/8/25 at 12:26 pm to bigDgator
quote:
The minute they fail to profit from it.
eh, yes and no. college athletics weren't profitable for most of their existence (still aren't at a ton of smaller schools), just like high school sports aren't profitable. There's still value in them. When college sports began, no one thought they'd ever become profitable to the universities. Coaches didn't get rich coaching college teams either. Basically everything changed with cable television and then went into overdrive in the 2000s
This post was edited on 5/8/25 at 12:28 pm
Posted on 5/8/25 at 12:34 pm to lsufball19
quote:
people keep saying this without stating the obvious....coaches sign contracts and have buyout provisions in those contract (liquidated damages) if they or those schools terminate those contracts early, Players do not, so people really need to stop passing the situations off as if they are comparable
For sure. Coach movement is regulated, player movement isn't.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 12:45 pm to Tiger97
They didn't go there to play school, they went there to play ball.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 1:55 pm to Tiger97
My solution is approaching turning the tv off. Just stop watching.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 1:59 pm to Tiger97
3 years for a kid to set out one ? You realize he wouldn’t have any time left.
One time transfer that’s it .
One time transfer that’s it .
Posted on 5/8/25 at 2:31 pm to Soonerd78
Between medical years, grad years, and the other exceptions the NCAA is regularly allowing, the old 4 years is it model left the station several years ago.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 2:34 pm to TriStateAreaFootball
Yes, I am. Some schools have benefited from this new Wild Wild West of unlimited transfers. I'm sure some/most of their fans may think it is great.
Popular
Back to top
