Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Transfer portal

Posted on 5/8/25 at 10:05 am
Posted by Tiger97
Member since Feb 2015
511 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 10:05 am
Curious if most college football/basketball fans think the current transfer situation needs fixing?

I do. Too many kids who attend a different school every year of their college career.

So, here's a suggestion for a new system. Doubt it would fix all the problems, but it would at least add some pain for excessive use of the new transfer rules.

First transfer - free and clear, just like now. Too many coaches lie to get kids to sign on the dotted line. I would like players to have the option to get away from a bad situation if it is the exact opposite of what they were promised. I also think kids should get a chance to move on if the coaching staff they put their trust in is shown the door.

2nd transfer - Both the team and player commit for 2 years. Gotta transfer again? Get it right this time.

3rd transfer - sit out a year before you play, like the old transfer rules.

Probably not the perfect plan, but it forces players to put more skin in the game.

I also think teams having to put up transfer fees (paid to the school the kid is leaving) to bring in new players out of the portal (kind of like Soccer clubs in Europe) would slow things down.

I would like some sort of system to reduce schools treating the Portal like some kind of farm system.

Putting some rule like no NIL deals for the first year at the new school after a transfer would also put a screeching halt to the current transfer craze.

Posted by TriStateAreaFootball
Member since Dec 2024
1114 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 10:07 am to
quote:

Curious if most college football/basketball fans think the current transfer situation needs fixing?

No you're not.
quote:

I do. Too many kids who attend a different school every year of their college career.

You and everybody else.
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
51003 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 10:52 am to
if coaches can do whatever they want I would think it would be hard to walk it back again - players should have freedom of movement in college athletics

I have no problems with true NIL and there should be no cap

the problem is the collectives and that's where the change needs to happen and I believe this settlement will impact the collectives with revenue sharing replacing it and that will be more equitable across the board
This post was edited on 5/8/25 at 10:53 am
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
43801 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 11:18 am to
No. If everyone was serious about keeping college sports "college," you put a cap on coaching and administrative salaries. Everyone is quick to regulate labor, and gloss over failures of management.
Posted by TriStateAreaFootball
Member since Dec 2024
1114 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 11:19 am to
quote:

No. If everyone was serious about keeping college sports "college," you put a cap on coaching and administrative salaries. Everyone is quick to regulate labor, and gloss over failures of management.


No one disagrees with this. OP just wanted to start a thread.
Posted by ukraine_rebel
North Mississippi
Member since Oct 2012
3233 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 11:28 am to
quote:

the problem is the collectives and that's where the change needs to happen and I believe this settlement will impact the collectives with revenue sharing replacing it and that will be more equitable across the board


The collectives won't be impacted, they'll just be rebranded.
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
51003 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 11:29 am to
at what point does universities decide to get out of the athletics business altogether
Posted by bigDgator
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2008
46785 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 11:47 am to
quote:


at what point does universities decide to get out of the athletics business altogether


The minute they fail to profit from it.
Posted by ukraine_rebel
North Mississippi
Member since Oct 2012
3233 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 12:01 pm to
Probably the national exposure alone that's afforded by having a big-time sports program is reason enough to keep fielding one.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
69050 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

if coaches can do whatever they want I would think it would be hard to walk it back again - players should have freedom of movement in college athletics

people keep saying this without stating the obvious....coaches sign contracts and have buyout provisions in those contract (liquidated damages) if they or those schools terminate those contracts early, Players do not, so people really need to stop passing the situations off as if they are comparable
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
69050 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

The minute they fail to profit from it.

eh, yes and no. college athletics weren't profitable for most of their existence (still aren't at a ton of smaller schools), just like high school sports aren't profitable. There's still value in them. When college sports began, no one thought they'd ever become profitable to the universities. Coaches didn't get rich coaching college teams either. Basically everything changed with cable television and then went into overdrive in the 2000s
This post was edited on 5/8/25 at 12:28 pm
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Midwest, USA
Member since Dec 2019
61686 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

people keep saying this without stating the obvious....coaches sign contracts and have buyout provisions in those contract (liquidated damages) if they or those schools terminate those contracts early, Players do not, so people really need to stop passing the situations off as if they are comparable


For sure. Coach movement is regulated, player movement isn't.
Posted by TinGym
Member since Jun 2016
3015 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 12:45 pm to
They didn't go there to play school, they went there to play ball.
Posted by deputyfife
Member since Dec 2013
1291 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 1:55 pm to
My solution is approaching turning the tv off. Just stop watching.
Posted by Soonerd78
Member since Sep 2024
1674 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 1:59 pm to
3 years for a kid to set out one ? You realize he wouldn’t have any time left.
One time transfer that’s it .
Posted by Tiger97
Member since Feb 2015
511 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 2:31 pm to
Between medical years, grad years, and the other exceptions the NCAA is regularly allowing, the old 4 years is it model left the station several years ago.
Posted by Tiger97
Member since Feb 2015
511 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 2:34 pm to
Yes, I am. Some schools have benefited from this new Wild Wild West of unlimited transfers. I'm sure some/most of their fans may think it is great.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter