Started By
Message
Todays games prove 4 teams is the right number for Playoffs
Posted on 12/31/16 at 9:32 pm
Posted on 12/31/16 at 9:32 pm
There's a HUGE difference between the best team and the 4th best team. There's no need for more than 4 teams in the Playoffs to find the legitimate National Champion. More than 4 teams would create unnecessary games that would thin out attendance and burn out the country on college football.
eta - Average fans can't afford to attend a bunch of Playoff games.
eta - Average fans can't afford to attend a bunch of Playoff games.
This post was edited on 12/31/16 at 9:34 pm
23
Posted on 12/31/16 at 9:33 pm to 12thFairway
#1 vs #2, what more can college football fans ask for?
Posted on 12/31/16 at 9:38 pm to 12thFairway
2 boring games
Posted on 12/31/16 at 10:08 pm to tigerskin
quote:
2 boring games
And how much more boring would it be to watch the #1 team beat the #6 or #8 seed by 50.
Posted on 12/31/16 at 10:10 pm to 12thFairway
Not necessarily. What if Penn St comes out and blows the doors off USC?
Then it shows how important expanding is to make sure you get the right teams in
Then it shows how important expanding is to make sure you get the right teams in
Posted on 12/31/16 at 10:12 pm to lsupride87
The right teams were in, and y'all will get to witness another great championship game vs #1 and #2. Sit back and enjoy the entertainment.
Posted on 12/31/16 at 10:13 pm to 12thFairway
The #6-8 teams have no business getting a shot at the title. I wish people would quit trying to turn college football into the NFL. I hate seeing shitty teams like the Giants with 6-7 losses pull together and get going on a hotstreak to win a title.
This post was edited on 12/31/16 at 10:14 pm
Posted on 12/31/16 at 10:13 pm to RT1941
I'm not saying the right teams weren't in
But if the BIg 10 champ who beat OSU comes out and crushes USC, it will prove to me expanding isn't neccisarrily a bad thing
But if the BIg 10 champ who beat OSU comes out and crushes USC, it will prove to me expanding isn't neccisarrily a bad thing
This post was edited on 12/31/16 at 10:14 pm
Posted on 12/31/16 at 10:13 pm to 12thFairway
I disagree you left out two of the hottest teams in the nation at the end of the season. Penn state and USC. With a 8 team playoff they would have got in and created alot more excitement
Posted on 12/31/16 at 10:16 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Not necessarily. What if Penn St comes out and blows the doors off USC?
Then it shows how important expanding is to make sure you get the right teams in
Why? Because they needed a blocked FG to beat the abortion of a team we saw tonight? What a pile of bullshite.
Posted on 12/31/16 at 10:17 pm to FLBooGoTigs1
quote:
With a 8 team playoff they would have got in and created alot more excitement
Posted on 12/31/16 at 10:18 pm to BamaGradinTn
I am just pointing out the flaw in the OPs logic
In 2004, USC crushed #2 OU by 30+ points
So did that show that the bcs should def not expand to more than 2 teams?
In 2004, USC crushed #2 OU by 30+ points
So did that show that the bcs should def not expand to more than 2 teams?
Posted on 12/31/16 at 10:22 pm to BamaGradinTn
What is so funny?
Posted on 12/31/16 at 10:25 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Then it shows how important expanding is to make sure you get the right teams in
The goal is to find the 2 best teams not the 4 best. If you are trying to get the 4 best you need 6 or 8 in PO to make sure. Screw that. 4 is enough to find the 2 best
Posted on 12/31/16 at 11:00 pm to FLBooGoTigs1
The same USC team that Bama beat by 46? Yeah I'm sure they would've faired well.
Before you say anything, I don't care if Tom Brady took over as QB, USC isn't 46 points better than week 1.
Before you say anything, I don't care if Tom Brady took over as QB, USC isn't 46 points better than week 1.
Posted on 12/31/16 at 11:00 pm to FLBooGoTigs1
Delete
This post was edited on 12/31/16 at 11:01 pm
Posted on 12/31/16 at 11:00 pm to FLBooGoTigs1
Delete too
This post was edited on 12/31/16 at 11:02 pm
Posted on 12/31/16 at 11:07 pm to 12thFairway
quote:
There's a HUGE difference between the best team and the 4th best team.
This year. Are you seriously saying this will be the case every year?
quote:
More than 4 teams would create unnecessary games that would thin out attendance and burn out the country on college football.
bullshite. So why hasn't the FCS and other football classifications died out?
Posted on 12/31/16 at 11:37 pm to lsupride87
quote:That was the first major blow to the bcs. Undefeated mid majors and the LSU/Bama rematch is what got us to 4 teams. It is fine as it is. I do not want to devalue the regular season games, anymore than we have.
n 2004, USC crushed #2 OU by 30+ points
So did that show that the bcs should def not expand to more than 2 teams?
This post was edited on 12/31/16 at 11:39 pm
Posted on 1/1/17 at 1:20 am to 12thFairway
6
Page 1 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News