re: This Year's Auburn Team Would Destroy Last Year's Bama Team

Your drunk.
2009-10 Bama >>>>>>>>> 2010-11 Auburn.

quote:

---

a) it WAS a bad call

---

Yes.

quote:

---

b) that maybe such calls affected the flow and outcome of the game?

---

Possible, but doubtful. At that point in the game, you were playing with a cold Jarrett Lee and your starting running back had just broken his collar bone. Your offense had sucked all night. Backup QB and running back will not likely drive down the field to score a game winning touchdown - when they hadn't been able to do that all night. Just saying.

The only reason cam was successful this year was because inexperience in the secondary. That wasn't the case last year. We shut down cams running game completely. So, what makes you think that cam would be productive against last years d?

quote:

---

Possible, but doubtful. At that point in the game, you were playing with a cold Jarrett Lee and your starting running back had just broken his collar bone. Your offense had sucked all night. Backup QB and running back will not likely drive down the field to score a game winning touchdown - when they hadn't been able to do that all night. Just saying.

---

I don't think we would have won either. Bama was the better team. We lost mostly because Ingram ran all over us in the 2nd half. But it was a one score game at the time, Lee was the QB on the previous TD drive, momemtum still matters, and it only takes one breakdown, play, etc.

As far as the OP, I certainly don't think AU '10 would destroy UA '09. Who did they "destroy" other than USCe in the SECCG. But as far who was the better team I think you have to qualify things somewhat since teams improve, regress, have injuries, schedule sequences, etc.

I think Bama '09 was a more complete team at the end of the season than AU is presently so I'd give a slight edge to Bama.

He hit a couple of big plays but he was pretty ineffective for most of the game.

well he put 21 up so i gotta think cam would/could put up that at least

ok

lol it doesn't really matter, we will never find out. I think that if both teams played ten times, it probably would be 5-5

quote:

---

b) that maybe such calls affected the flow and outcome of the game?
Maybe it affected it. But most LSU fans with any common sense have also admitted that it very likely would not have mattered anyway

---

Even though the water is way past the bridge that is a gross understatement to say "maybe" Peterson's play would have affected the momentum of the game. The pendulum had swung completely with that great play and anything could have happened at that point. No, most Tiger fans, those with and without good sense, would not concede that had the play stood as it should have, the game's outcome could have been changed. That kind of play can quickly deflate the opposition and the idiotic morons in the booth took that chance away from the Tigers. You guys will get your turn to get screwed big-time one of these days and you'll all b*tch and moan just like Tiger fans have done for over a year now. That's what fans do with or without good sense.

With the video evidence that the booth guys had, it really isn't surprising that it wasn't overturned. You couldn't tell without a reasonable doubt that he was in based on the video evidence. LET IT GO.

And we already got screwed in 04 when Corey Webster pushed our wr down in the endzone literally right in front of the ref, and Webster intercepted the ball. We definitely didn't bitch and moan near as much as LSU fans. LET IT GO.