Started By
Message
re: This can't be right
Posted on 10/16/24 at 10:44 am to ukraine_rebel
Posted on 10/16/24 at 10:44 am to ukraine_rebel
quote:
It's ok, I'm pretty sure they think so too
0
Posted on 10/16/24 at 10:53 am to FootballFrenzy
quote:40 threads started and almost 2000 posts total in the month of October alone
FootballFrenzy
Dude, get a life
Posted on 10/16/24 at 10:57 am to Archibald
quote:
2000 posts total in the month of October alone
Everybody Oktober's their own way.
Posted on 10/16/24 at 11:04 am to FootballFrenzy
You gonna put it on a cup or something?
Posted on 10/16/24 at 11:11 am to Cuthbert13
Posted on 10/16/24 at 11:19 am to ukraine_rebel
quote:
Let's see, LSU 1 a&m 0
Hmm, lets go back to see the last one Ole Miss had. Hell, that was 4 years before I was born, and i am 57..
This post was edited on 10/16/24 at 11:20 am
Posted on 10/16/24 at 11:37 am to FootballFrenzy
So your comparing apples to prunes?
Posted on 10/16/24 at 11:42 am to FootballFrenzy
12 of LSUs have been in the SEC.
All 18 of ATMs have been in the Little Blind Sisters conferences that ATM has belonged to over the years.
In traditional conference affiliation there are 2 Big 10 teams in the top 20 winningest programs in CFB history. Texas, ATM, Oklahoma and Nebraska are the only 4 from 3 different conferences where they either shared a conference or were somehow aligned with one another. There are 6 charter members of the SEC in the top 20 and 3 in the top 10. Those 6 teams have played one another a BUNCH over the years. Had those programs had the advantage of ONLY playing one other team annually off that list they'd most likely be the top 6 or at least all 6 would be in the top 10. Had those 6 played the likes of Kansas, Kansas State, Baylor, TCU, Houston, Rice, Texas Tech and a host of others who are the conference equivalent of rent a wins those 6 would have a far higher number of total wins. 2 off those SEC teams play the winningest program every year and one othose 2 plays the 9th winningest program of all time every year. The 9th team plays that team and the 20th team on the list every year and the others have played one another on average of every 4 years. It just ain't the same. Texas, OU, ATM and Nebraska as well as Ohio State and Michigan have only faced one another on a regular basis. Its ALWAYS been tougher to get wins against the top 6 of the SEC than than it has been the top 2 of the BIG10 and the top 4 out of whatever the frick conference UT, OU, ATM and UN have belonged to in the past.
All 18 of ATMs have been in the Little Blind Sisters conferences that ATM has belonged to over the years.
In traditional conference affiliation there are 2 Big 10 teams in the top 20 winningest programs in CFB history. Texas, ATM, Oklahoma and Nebraska are the only 4 from 3 different conferences where they either shared a conference or were somehow aligned with one another. There are 6 charter members of the SEC in the top 20 and 3 in the top 10. Those 6 teams have played one another a BUNCH over the years. Had those programs had the advantage of ONLY playing one other team annually off that list they'd most likely be the top 6 or at least all 6 would be in the top 10. Had those 6 played the likes of Kansas, Kansas State, Baylor, TCU, Houston, Rice, Texas Tech and a host of others who are the conference equivalent of rent a wins those 6 would have a far higher number of total wins. 2 off those SEC teams play the winningest program every year and one othose 2 plays the 9th winningest program of all time every year. The 9th team plays that team and the 20th team on the list every year and the others have played one another on average of every 4 years. It just ain't the same. Texas, OU, ATM and Nebraska as well as Ohio State and Michigan have only faced one another on a regular basis. Its ALWAYS been tougher to get wins against the top 6 of the SEC than than it has been the top 2 of the BIG10 and the top 4 out of whatever the frick conference UT, OU, ATM and UN have belonged to in the past.
Posted on 10/16/24 at 11:45 am to AwgustaDawg
I feel like you may have made a point, but the text wall prevented me from reading past the first 2.5 sentences, so I don't know.
Posted on 10/16/24 at 11:46 am to FootballFrenzy
quote:
quote: Let's see, LSU 1 a&m 0 Wait, you're saying we could tie our SEC conference record with LSU this year?!
He is. What “Ukraine” Rebel didn’t say, is that Ole Miss won’t.
Posted on 10/16/24 at 12:06 pm to LSUNV
quote:
Not a single SEC championship!
It's even worse than that: Ole Piss with their "SEC West Co-Champions" BS has a better SEC resume than the Aggies since they ran away in fear of their big bro.
Let that sink in, Ags. Ole Miss with a fake SECW championship has a better SEC record than your team.
:rotflmao:Posted on 10/16/24 at 2:05 pm to crash1211
It was still better than A&M I thought you’d be happy!
Posted on 10/16/24 at 2:55 pm to Dotarian
It would be a little funny if texas won the sec in their first year with aggy imploding
Posted on 10/16/24 at 3:10 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Has aTm ever seen the inside of Mercedes-Benz Stadium
Yes when Maziel played Duke in the Mayo Bowl
Posted on 10/16/24 at 3:15 pm to Pimphand
quote:
Yes when Maziel played Duke in the Mayo Bowl
Negatory, sir. That was the Chick-fil-A Bowl held in the Georgia Dome.
Posted on 10/16/24 at 3:18 pm to FootballFrenzy
quote:
18 CONFERENCE CHAMPIONSHIPS
LSU would have 40+ in those conferences. SEC is just different baw. Look at how close LSU, UGA, Tennessee are in CCs. Then AU, UF not too far behind.
This post was edited on 10/16/24 at 3:20 pm
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News