Started By
Message
The worst aspect of modern college football that gets the least attention
Posted on 8/2/26 at 2:20 am
Posted on 8/2/26 at 2:20 am
Gigantic oversized conferences produce extremely lopsided schedule disparities.
Saw a long Twitter thread from the College Football Nerds talking about this issue.
https://x.com/i/status/2083563892811116823
It's always been difficult to compare teams across conferences, but now you can't even reliably compare two teams within the "same" conference.
They provided a few ridiculous examples.
FSU and Clemson are both in the ACC yet they share ONE common opponent. Ordering them in conference standings is a complete farce.
SMU plays 1 game against the top 7 finishers of the ACC. Their schedule is literally the entire bottom half of the conference.
They used A&M last year as an example from the SEC, who through no fault of their own also had a conference schedule that was almost exclusively the entire bottom half of the conference.
With 8-10 you can do full round robin, with 12 you could do reasonable divisions, there a reason conferences naturally stopped there for all of history until everything went insane a few years ago.
A conference of 16, 18, 20 teams isn't really even a conference anymore. The teams at the top of the standings will be as much a function of favorable schedule as quality of team.
Saw a long Twitter thread from the College Football Nerds talking about this issue.
https://x.com/i/status/2083563892811116823
It's always been difficult to compare teams across conferences, but now you can't even reliably compare two teams within the "same" conference.
They provided a few ridiculous examples.
FSU and Clemson are both in the ACC yet they share ONE common opponent. Ordering them in conference standings is a complete farce.
SMU plays 1 game against the top 7 finishers of the ACC. Their schedule is literally the entire bottom half of the conference.
They used A&M last year as an example from the SEC, who through no fault of their own also had a conference schedule that was almost exclusively the entire bottom half of the conference.
With 8-10 you can do full round robin, with 12 you could do reasonable divisions, there a reason conferences naturally stopped there for all of history until everything went insane a few years ago.
A conference of 16, 18, 20 teams isn't really even a conference anymore. The teams at the top of the standings will be as much a function of favorable schedule as quality of team.
This post was edited on 8/2/26 at 2:25 am
Posted on 8/2/26 at 4:11 am to StansberryRules
you can inline that stuff even on tRANT's 486 servers running 2002 ASP.NET webforms
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 8/2/26 at 4:28 am to StansberryRules
We need to resolve this with a 32 team playoff system!
Back to top
3








