Started By
Message
The SEC is suing LSU because their questioning a rule made the SEC look stupid?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:28 pm
In the state court, the argument is about NCAA eligibility rules. The SEC realized they were losing that battle in Louisiana. To bypass the state judge entirely, the SEC went to a Federal Court and raised a completely different legal argument: the First Amendment right to "expressive association".
The SEC is arguing that under the U.S. Constitution, a private group has the right to define its own mission and choose who it associates with. They are telling the federal court: “A state judge has the right to protect an athlete, but that judge does NOT have the right to force our private conference to change its core values and include them.” While this is somewhat true it forces the SEC to make a rule that is clear and without question which they did not. They randomly created a kneejerk ruling to try and stave off criticism. They failed on both accounts and they will lose this lawsuit too.
Why is no one seeing the issue is with Sankey and the SEC acting more irresponsible than the NCAA?
With each passing year it proves that the only model the NCAA and conferences were ok with was using 18-22 year old students to make billions and severely punishing them if they stepped out of line.
The SEC is arguing that under the U.S. Constitution, a private group has the right to define its own mission and choose who it associates with. They are telling the federal court: “A state judge has the right to protect an athlete, but that judge does NOT have the right to force our private conference to change its core values and include them.” While this is somewhat true it forces the SEC to make a rule that is clear and without question which they did not. They randomly created a kneejerk ruling to try and stave off criticism. They failed on both accounts and they will lose this lawsuit too.
Why is no one seeing the issue is with Sankey and the SEC acting more irresponsible than the NCAA?
With each passing year it proves that the only model the NCAA and conferences were ok with was using 18-22 year old students to make billions and severely punishing them if they stepped out of line.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:32 pm to winkchance
quote:
To bypass the state judge entirely
LSU fans thinking good ol' boys in Louisiana make all the rules

Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:36 pm to winkchance
LSU voted for the rule nimrod
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:37 pm to winkchance
Only LSU could vote in favor of the rule and still rightfully get taken to the cleaners.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:40 pm to winkchance
quote:
The SEC is arguing that under the U.S. Constitution, a private group has the right to define its own mission and choose who it associates with. They are telling the federal court: “A state judge has the right to protect an athlete, but that judge does NOT have the right to force our private conference to change its core values and include them.” While this is somewhat true
Brother, if you think that's just "somewhat" true, I got some news for you.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:42 pm to scottydoesntknow
They obstained libtard
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:43 pm to jangalang
quote:
Only LSU could vote in favor of the rule and still rightfully get taken to the cleaners.
A&M voted for it while they actively had a former pro on their roster. He was listed in the website the day the rule was voted on.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:47 pm to winkchance
Sankey is toast. No way he survives this
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:57 pm to stopitnow1
quote:
They obstained libtard
lolol no
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:06 pm to winkchance
The SEC is arguing like an SECRant poster, constantly moving the goalposts. First it was, "these 2022 players are ineligible because their 4 years are up". Then it became, "these players may be eligible, but only if they withdrew from the draft, and didn't participate in an NFL camp/practice". Then it changed to, "they're ineligible if they signed a contract with the NFL, and we'll punish any SEC team that uses them". Now it seems to be, "We're suing LSU because they recruited NFL players"?
It seems like the SEC legal strategy is throw out new ideas and wait for them to be shot down. What rule did LSU break? What's the allegation other than "recruiting" a player who may or may not prove to be ineligible? Teams have done that for decades. Plus, they still ignore the fact that many of these players would have never tried to go NFL in 2026 if you hadn't waited for them to pursue their careers before making the rule official. This is all more confusing than reading posts by SloFloPro on the political board.
It seems like the SEC legal strategy is throw out new ideas and wait for them to be shot down. What rule did LSU break? What's the allegation other than "recruiting" a player who may or may not prove to be ineligible? Teams have done that for decades. Plus, they still ignore the fact that many of these players would have never tried to go NFL in 2026 if you hadn't waited for them to pursue their careers before making the rule official. This is all more confusing than reading posts by SloFloPro on the political board.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 2:32 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:08 pm to winkchance
So SEC is suing the court judge?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:15 pm to stopitnow1
quote:
The move comes a day after LSU's athletics director, Verge Ausberry, and president Wade Rousse, voted in favor of the new rule banning former NFL, NBA and WNBA players from playing on teams in the SEC.
this is embarrassing for you
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:21 pm to scottydoesntknow
That wasn't the formal vote, libtard. Read the article I posted before you make yourself look even more idiotic than you already are.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:35 pm to stopitnow1
quote:
That wasn't the formal vote, libtard. Read the article I posted before you make yourself look even more idiotic than you already are.
lol just keep digging that hole
Popular
Back to top
8










