Started By
Message
re: The SEC has multiple athletes from the ATP Tour who have made 6 figures
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:21 pm to tide06
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:21 pm to tide06
quote:
I would like to see any school who plays someone who meets that criteria face the sanctions outlined.
Excellent! First step, rule Missouri’s win yesterday as vacated.
quote:
If Sankey applies the rules inconsistently I doubt he survives it.
Ah. Yeah he’s already proven he can’t, or just won’t, do that.
1
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:28 pm to tide06
quote:
I would like to see any school who plays someone who meets that criteria face the sanctions outlined.
So would I. But it's clear that the SEC is persecuting LSU if they are not going to apply its own rules equally to all schools. Allowing them to do that is not an option for LSU. I feel that LSU would be more willing to comply had they have applied the rules equally.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:29 pm to RB10
quote:
Ah. Yeah he’s already proven he can’t, or just won’t, do that.
He hasn’t proven that, it happened yesterday.
Sanctions don’t happen overnight and the federal court case has barely gotten started.
If he doesn’t ever do anything you would have a valid point.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:32 pm to lsu711
quote:Maybe, if the SEC had a sport driving cars.
Could the SEC members vote to exclude all Asians from competition and its members be protected by that policy?
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:33 pm to tide06
quote:
He hasn’t proven that, it happened yesterday.
Yes he has. He and the SEC sued LSU while other schools were breaking the same rules.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 1:21 pm to lsupride87
quote:
The SEC’s rule on prohibiting pro players is now well defined
He quite literally said under oath he couldn’t define it.
All these people holding water for the SEC and Sankey didn't see the receipts from his testimony yesterday. Everyone should have a vote of no confidence for this man. He is a joke. He could not answer the most basic questions about the application of the rules.
As long as the NCAA/SEC continues with the uneven application of the rules, the courts will be involved.
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:06 pm to RB10
quote:
Yes he has. He and the SEC sued LSU while other schools were breaking the same rules.
This is why you were sued:
quote:
The SEC alleges that LSU and Kiffin “waged a deliberate and coordinated campaign to recruit professional athletes” (specifically former NFL signees) to LSU’s 2026–27 football roster in defiance of longstanding SEC rules and a recent conference policy that prohibit rostering players who signed professional contracts or appeared on NFL rosters.
Key points from the complaint and reporting:
The players involved include former Ole Miss players under Kiffin (tight end Dae’Quan Wright, who signed with the Cleveland Browns, and defensive tackle Zxavian Harris, who signed with the New Orleans Saints), plus others such as former Denver Broncos defensive back Blake Cotton and potentially Jack Pyburn (Tampa Bay Buccaneers). Some had begun practicing with LSU.
And this is what they said it caused:
quote:
The SEC seeks declaratory and injunctive relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, including preliminary and permanent injunctions to:
Stop defendants from compelling the SEC to associate with the prohibited conduct.
Prevent defendants from deterring, coercing, or punishing the SEC for enforcing its rules/mission.
Do you have evidence Missouri did that? If so they should be sued too.
It doesnt mean you shouldn't.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:09 pm to lsupride87
LSU fans still can’t understand the rules … It said nothing about golf….
it’s clear what sports are prohibited …. LSU fans are so retarded they just can’t comprehend plain English.
it’s clear what sports are prohibited …. LSU fans are so retarded they just can’t comprehend plain English.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:09 pm to tide06
quote:
Do you have evidence Missouri did that? If so they should be sued too.
Yes. Missouri signed, rostered and played a player that filed the exact same type of lawsuit against the NCAA, SEC and Missouri.
The problem is, they aren’t being sued. Hence the reason the SEC has no ground to stand on.
quote:
It doesnt mean you shouldn't.
Sure it does. This is like saying you can murder someone and not face consequences but if I do it I have to go to prison.
The SEC is choosing who to go after even though everyone is breaking the same rule.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:18 pm to RB10
quote:
Yes. Missouri signed, rostered and played a player that filed the exact same type of lawsuit against the NCAA, SEC and Missouri.
I just explained the fundamental nature of the suit that was filed against you.
They werent listed because the SEC is saying they didnt entice the students into a Baton Rouge court the same way you did.
Missouri should be dealt with but they cant be in that suit because they didnt do what you are being accused of.
quote:
This is like saying you can murder someone and not face consequences but if I do it I have to go to prison.
Again, Missouri needs to face consequences. If they dont you will have a point.
But being upset something that happened last night hasnt resulted in sanctions while other cases have required the time of the league office to address is absurd. Penalties dont happen in a day.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News