Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/6/11 at 3:44 pm to DocBugbear
quote:
and to hear the lamentation of their women.
I've definitely enjoyed it since last night.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 3:46 pm to Zamoro10
quote:
Zamoro10
Stick with your failed defense of Joe Paterno it is obvious you don't know what the hell you are talking about when it comes to football.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 3:47 pm to BAMABREZE
It was an interception just like Patrick Petersen intercepted in 2009.
Stop the
nutsnorters.
Stop the
nutsnorters. 
Posted on 11/6/11 at 3:48 pm to BAMABREZE
quote:It was an interception. He was juggling the ball as he went to the ground.
The Interception.....OR WAS IT ??
Quit crying about it.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 3:53 pm to Grassy1
quote:
Feel free to have heaping helping of that helpless stomach sickness that LSU fans felt when bama was given the ball after Patrick Peterson
Only Bama wasn't robbed on this one cause the BOTH refs on the goal line made the right call the instant it happened.
This post was edited on 11/6/11 at 3:55 pm
Posted on 11/6/11 at 4:02 pm to TigerTreyjpg
quote:
I think the right call was made, but I'll say this. If it's called a catch on the field, I wouldn't have seen it getting overturned.
People need to quit spreading this misinformation. You dont know what you're talking about. Had they said the replay was inconclusive you would be right. However they confirmed the ruling meaning there was conclusive evidence in favor I the ruling on the field.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 4:02 pm to dawgdayafternoon
quote:
It was.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 4:05 pm to BAMABREZE
Definitely was...Doesn't matter about simultaneous possession. Reid had the ball when they hit the ground.
Go look for another excuse...
Go look for another excuse...
Posted on 11/6/11 at 4:12 pm to RammerJammerBammer
Dude it was an obvious int when u look at the replays
Posted on 11/6/11 at 4:17 pm to BAMABREZE
For the butt hurt elephants that think they should have had the ball on the 1, look at the rules. They require the receiver to maintain control through the fall to the ground. I gooGled the rule and here is an example rule decision:
Airborne receiver A85 possesses the ball and in the process of going to the ground, first contacts the ground with his left foot as he falls to the ground inbounds. Immediately upon hitting the ground, the ball comes loose and touches the ground. Ruling: Incomplete pass. An airborne receiver must maintain control of the ball if going to the ground in the process of completing a catch.
Thus, even if he had the ball, wasn't fighting Reid for it, and didn't bobble it, he lost it when Hit the ground and Reid then possessed it without it ever hitting the ground.
By the way, PP7 only needed one of his two feet in.
Airborne receiver A85 possesses the ball and in the process of going to the ground, first contacts the ground with his left foot as he falls to the ground inbounds. Immediately upon hitting the ground, the ball comes loose and touches the ground. Ruling: Incomplete pass. An airborne receiver must maintain control of the ball if going to the ground in the process of completing a catch.
Thus, even if he had the ball, wasn't fighting Reid for it, and didn't bobble it, he lost it when Hit the ground and Reid then possessed it without it ever hitting the ground.
By the way, PP7 only needed one of his two feet in.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 4:20 pm to BAMABREZE
If you're talking about the Peterson incident, yes- it was.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 4:21 pm to dunkelman
Congrats LSU
Good luck the rest of the way
Good luck the rest of the way
Posted on 11/6/11 at 4:22 pm to dunkelman
quote:
For the butt hurt elephants that think they should have had the ball on the 1, look at the rules. They require the receiver to maintain control through the fall to the ground. I gooGled the rule and here is an example rule decision:
Airborne receiver A85 possesses the ball and in the process of going to the ground, first contacts the ground with his left foot as he falls to the ground inbounds. Immediately upon hitting the ground, the ball comes loose and touches the ground. Ruling: Incomplete pass. An airborne receiver must maintain control of the ball if going to the ground in the process of completing a catch.
Thus, even if he had the ball, wasn't fighting Reid for it, and didn't bobble it, he lost it when Hit the ground and Reid then possessed it without it ever hitting the ground.
By the way, PP7 only needed one of his two feet in.
thread/
Posted on 11/6/11 at 4:23 pm to BAMABREZE
quote:
Williams had control and was down
It was a pick. Reid made a fantastic play!!!
Posted on 11/6/11 at 4:23 pm to BAMABREZE
Can you show me a picture with Williams down and possession?????
Because you know we have a picture that no one disputes of PP7 intercepting Ginger-Mac.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 4:27 pm to BAMABREZE
Posted on 11/6/11 at 4:29 pm to DennyChimes10
quote:
At least the LSU whiners will focus more on
[link=(At least the LSU whiners will focus more on)]Seriously[/link]
Posted on 11/6/11 at 4:34 pm to RammerJammerBammer
quote:
No pick. Refs always cheat bama vs LSU. Keith brown
Please. The refs didn't bite when Brown faked a pratfall.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 4:37 pm to DennyChimes10
Receiver starts to lose control before he hit the ground. Bottom line is this, If the ball would have popped out after that it would be an incomplete pass. The fact that it ended up in a LSU players hands makes it an interception.
Page 6 of 7
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News