Started By
Message
re: The Interception.....OR WAS IT ??
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:12 pm to LaBornNRaised
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:12 pm to LaBornNRaised
Pretend Reid wasn't even there.
If Bama's tight end jumps up, catches the ball, comes down with it, holding the ball when he hits the ground, but the jar from the ground knocks the ball loose, it is an incomplete pass.
This ball never touched the ground though...
Obvious interception is obvious.
Only the most crimson of goggles can see it any other way.
edit: DocBugBear beat me to it
If Bama's tight end jumps up, catches the ball, comes down with it, holding the ball when he hits the ground, but the jar from the ground knocks the ball loose, it is an incomplete pass.
This ball never touched the ground though...
Obvious interception is obvious.
Only the most crimson of goggles can see it any other way.
edit: DocBugBear beat me to it
This post was edited on 11/6/11 at 2:14 pm
0
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:13 pm to attheua
quote:
the non call on the dirty hit on Kirkpatrick
While it was ill concieved and I can understand your view, I don't think it was intentional or dirty. He looks to be trying to get his arm in front of Dre ( I know that is questionable also) and he just didn't realize how quick Dre was and how out of position he was, split second reaction to getting beat and he made a poor one.
Yes I do believe a personal foul should have been called regardless.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:13 pm to attheua
quote:
It looked like they didn't even give the guy a personal foul?
I don't think what the penalty was would have mattered because I believe it was a half the distance penalty (might be wrong) but half the distance is the same no matter what the actual penalty is.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:13 pm to attheua
quote:
It looked like they didn't even give the guy a personal foul?
they didn't and it didn't warrant one. they gave him a holding.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:15 pm to Elleshoe
Int or not...does it really matter? Bama had all the chances they could have asked for to win the game. The Reed int play should never have mattered one way or the other.
Reed made a fantastic play for the ball. Maze under threw it and Williams did not make certain there could be no question. From a play "continuation" stand point, it was an Int.
Both teams played a great game. The hitting was huge. Congrats to LSU!
Reed made a fantastic play for the ball. Maze under threw it and Williams did not make certain there could be no question. From a play "continuation" stand point, it was an Int.
Both teams played a great game. The hitting was huge. Congrats to LSU!
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:18 pm to BAMABREZE
quote:
I agree with the guy that said if it had been ruled a catch then it wouldn't have been overturned.
It would have been overturned had they ruled it a catch. They said replay confirmed the call which means they clearly saw an interception.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:19 pm to MOT
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:19 pm to T Rey WI
I really try hard not to bash Verne alot, because I actually find him to be likeable, but what the hell was that "oh no!" about? Did he have money on the game or something?
Sorry, didn't mean to
Carry on.
Sorry, didn't mean to
Carry on.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:19 pm to BAMABREZE
quote:
Williams had control and was down
Yeah, just like Peterson had control and was inbounds.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:19 pm to BAMABREZE
We got the call in YOUR house! nuff said. 
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:20 pm to BAMABREZE
quote:
Williams had control and was down
You're blind. He had control... in the air.
Then he lost control when Reid put a hand on the ball. Then he hit the ground while bobbling and Reid wrestled it away.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:20 pm to BAMABREZE
quote:
Williams had control and was down
I am as objective as they come, and you are full of shite. The ball was moving before he hit the ground
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:22 pm to DennyChimes10
Couldn't see it that well from the stands, but looking at the pics people have posted it looks like the right call was made.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:22 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Sorry, didn't realize pic was already posted.
This post was edited on 11/6/11 at 2:27 pm
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:22 pm to BAMABREZE
quote:
Williams had control and was down
You must watch a replay. He never had control......or was that an interception by PP?
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:23 pm to attheua
quote:
Meh, it doesn't matter. I'm more mad about the non call on the dirty hit on Kirkpatrick. It looked like they didn't even give the guy a personal foul? I couldn't hear the ref's explanation for all the booing
It was a stupid hold from a player much smaller than the other. Bad play but not intentional or warranting a personal foul….
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:24 pm to BAMABREZE
You need glass's....or that big screen does not have HD... 
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:24 pm to BAMABREZE
quote:
Williams had control and was down
No.
1.) Williams had initial control.
2.) Williams loss control (due to Reid) on the way down.
3.) Both Williams and Reid did not have control on the ground.
4.) Reid gained control on the ground.
5.) Interception by Reid.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:26 pm to BAMABREZE
quote:
The Interception.....OR WAS IT ??
Your TE did not have control of the ball when going down to the ground.
This post was edited on 11/6/11 at 4:51 pm
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:29 pm to TigerTreyjpg
quote:
I think the right call was made, but I'll say this. If it's called a catch on the field, I wouldn't have seen it getting overturned.
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News