Started By
Message
re: The crazy season of 1960
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:35 am to BenjyCompson
Posted on 4/6/20 at 9:35 am to BenjyCompson
quote:
Minnesota also was a bogus 1960 champion
Bogus or not, the AP and the Coaches awarded them the national championship for that season.
Posted on 4/6/20 at 10:57 am to McMillan
quote:
I know critical thinking and math skills are severely lacking down there, but ask yourself, do you really think, financially, you would be on par with the Big Ten without us and A&M ?
Pardon me, My sec doormat brethren in all sports (who insists on run-on sentences) but I’m not “down here,” I’m “over there.”
East Carolina is not down there. It’s out East. It also holds a .500 record with your joke football school.
Not a good look.
And yes, the sec would be fine without you. It’s now a literal joke that you think you saved the sec.
Say that out loud......” mizz and aggy Keep the sec relevant”
Now, my slack-jawed, faux-intelligent simpleton; see how stupid you sound.
This post was edited on 4/6/20 at 11:02 am
Posted on 4/6/20 at 11:11 am to RamboMizzou
SWC champs
Long before my time
Long before my time
Posted on 4/6/20 at 11:29 am to dstone12
You may be dumber than I originally thought.
Oh well, enjoy your PAAAWWWWL shows, etc and leave the real work to the intellectuals.
Oh well, enjoy your PAAAWWWWL shows, etc and leave the real work to the intellectuals.
Posted on 4/6/20 at 12:02 pm to McMillan
quote:
You may be dumber than I originally thought.
Oh well, enjoy your PAAAWWWWL shows, etc and leave the real work to the intellectuals.
Just non-seq babble.
Just as I expected, you proved that this high brow intellect, you want to portray it’s just a facade.
You’ve lowered any expectation I had of you.
This post was edited on 4/6/20 at 12:07 pm
Posted on 4/6/20 at 12:16 pm to RamboMizzou
That was a tough break for Mizzou.
I'm surprised that Iowa was in the running for the natty considering they lost head to head with Minnesota. If you have three teams in consideration for the national title and one of them lost to the other two... well wouldn't that team be as out of place in the talk for a national title as the town whore at a church wedding?
Say what you will about the flaws in the current system but compared to some of the results from years gone by its a miracle of clarity.
I'm surprised that Iowa was in the running for the natty considering they lost head to head with Minnesota. If you have three teams in consideration for the national title and one of them lost to the other two... well wouldn't that team be as out of place in the talk for a national title as the town whore at a church wedding?
Say what you will about the flaws in the current system but compared to some of the results from years gone by its a miracle of clarity.
Posted on 4/6/20 at 12:30 pm to mulletproof
quote:
Be happy with 3rd
They didn't even get that. They were 5th in the AP and 4th in the UPI.
Having read and seen posted several good summaries of this game over the years, KU won 23-7 and left at least another 10 pts on the field. KU's defense was the difference in the game. They completely shut down the Mizzou rush with 9 on the line knowing Mizzou only avg. 45 YPG passing. This was the third #1 team KU had faced that season. The other two managed a win even with the "ineligible" Coan in the backfield. Coan had 2 TDs on only 9 touches in the game, but KU had 3 other future NFL draft picks in their offensive backfield.
KU was the better team. They won the game on the field and rightfully won the Big 8. The later forfeit puts an * next to Mizzou claim of the Conference title.
From Mizzou student at the game:
quote:
My worst MU-KU memory was the 1960 game at Columbia. Missouri came into the game ranked #1 in the country after beating Oklahoma in Norman the previous week, 42-24. Kansas, with John Hadl at quarterback, upset us, and the game was not even close (the game was later awarded to Mizzou because Kansas used an ineligible player, but that didn't matter).
Sandy Josephson
B.J. '63
Mizzou Alumni Association
This post was edited on 4/6/20 at 1:13 pm
Posted on 4/6/20 at 12:49 pm to I-59 Tiger
quote:
You are a year off,Reb. You are recalling the 1959 season.
Coming from I-59 Tiger, makes sense
Posted on 4/6/20 at 2:45 pm to RamboMizzou
Damn. At least when Texas loses to Kansas, it occurs during their least proud years and not their most
Posted on 4/6/20 at 3:48 pm to XWing atAliciousness
Kansas was a dominant team that year. Mizzou had two games they allowed more than a TD that year.
OU and Kansas.
OU and Kansas.
Posted on 4/6/20 at 3:57 pm to RamboMizzou
quote:
Minnesota
quote:
The crazy season of 1960
Bobby Bell and Carl Eller played on that Minnesota team, LEGENDS
Posted on 4/6/20 at 5:56 pm to dstone12
quote:
Say that out loud......” mizz and aggy Keep the sec relevant”
Now, my slack-jawed, faux-intelligent simpleton; see how stupid you sound.
I don't know if I'd go so far as to say we kept the SEC relevant, but we brought a shite pot full of money along with us in terms of a richer broadcast contracts. Stupid indeed:
Texas A&M and Missouri Worth at Least $114 million a year to SEC Network
How the SEC Network became a nearly $5 billion powerhouse in a year
quote:
That decision proved extremely lucrative for the commissioner and the rest of the SEC. The conference later added Missouri and Texas A&M in 2011, increasing the SEC's cable television footprint by more than 10 million homes, according to Nielsen data, and giving Slive the ammo he needed to move forward with a network.
This post was edited on 4/6/20 at 6:05 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News