Started By
Message
re: The actual text of the text message
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:30 am to SneezyBeltranIsHere
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:30 am to SneezyBeltranIsHere
quote:
The technology exists to know whether or not he viewed this text.
And he willingly gave the police his phone, so they know. It's pretty clear he didn't know what was going on.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:31 am to Jon Ham
quote:
What’s funny is that an internet jackass like me is able to easily shed light on how dubious the handling of this situation has been.
Yes, because I'm sure you know all the details of what has been done.

Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:32 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
It's pretty clear he didn't know what was going on.
No, it’s not clear at all, because we have no confirmation as to whether he read the text message prior to delivering the gun nor has there been any confirmation as to whether anyone has even inquired into this question.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:33 am to SMD
Miller was an accessory to murder and Alabama is trying to cover it up.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:33 am to SneezyBeltranIsHere
Media is going to punch holes in this case. This is not over!
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:34 am to SneezyBeltranIsHere
quote:
IF it is confirmed he read the text, and still delivered the gun, would you agree he should be kicked off the team?
No, because he claims that he didn't even know the gun was in the car. You can choose to believe that or not, but assuming he read the text prior to arrival, and assuming he didn't know the gun was in the car, he was probably confused by that text.
Also...let's keep in mind that "[gun]" was not part of the text. Brackets indicate that the author of the article is attempting to translate the word "joint" for the reader.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:35 am to SneezyBeltranIsHere
quote:
If they know he read the text and he hasn't been charged, this is a massive miscarriage of justice.
Don’t be surprised when the trial starts that Miller is on the list of witnesses for the Prosecution. The DA has said as much that he is a cooperating witness. Bradley will be one too. Pretty obvious they cut a deal to avoid any charges, which was smart and good representation by their attorneys.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:35 am to RollTide1987
quote:
No, because he claims that he didn't even know the gun was in the car.
Link?
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:36 am to RollTide1987
quote:No it doesn’t. It indicates the testimony of what the police determined was being referenced.
Brackets indicate that the author of the article is attempting to translate the word "joint" for the reader.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:36 am to piggilicious
quote:
But he could have seen the text without even clicking specifically on the text to go into messages- depending on how he has his phone set up.
Good chance he has an apple watch. That raises the chance that he saw it instantly. ...and maybe not.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:37 am to SingleMalt1973
quote:
Link?
From his attorney's statement:
:format(webp):no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24453353/bm_1.png)
:format(webp):no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24453354/bm_2.jpg)
This post was edited on 2/24/23 at 8:38 am
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:38 am to RollTide1987
Which part says he didn’t know the gun was in his car?
This post was edited on 2/24/23 at 8:40 am
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:40 am to WDE24
quote:
Which part says he didn’t know the gun was in his car?
Where it says he never saw the gun. If that isn't definitive enough for you, guess what? The burden of proof isn't on Miller, it's on those who are accusing him.
Can you PROVE beyond a reasonable doubt that he knew the gun was in the back seat of his car?
This post was edited on 2/24/23 at 8:42 am
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:41 am to RollTide1987
quote:But conveniently in his attorney’s self serving press release didn’t say he didn’t know it was in his car. I wonder why? You understand he can be aware that a gun was left in his car without ever looking back to see it, right?
Where it says he never saw the gun.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:43 am to RollTide1987
quote:I certainly have enough circumstantial evidence for PC.
Can you PROVE beyond a reasonable doubt that he knew the gun was in the back seat of his car?
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:43 am to RollTide1987
quote:
From his attorney's statement:
The media is already questioning some of those statements. The lawyer press release will probably backfire on Miller.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:43 am to RollTide1987
quote:
From his attorney's statement:
That does not state that he did not know the gun was in the car. It states that Miller "never saw the handgun" and "never handled it." That doesn't mean he didn't know it was there. You fell for a carefully crafted statement by an attorney.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:43 am to RollTide1987
It says he never saw or handled it, the text says bring me my “joint” hood rat equivalent of gun. The attorney never says Brandon didn’t read the text. He claims Miller is completely innocent but stops short of totally clearing him by including that fact. Why wouldn’t he go that far? It doesn’t matter if he never saw it or handled it if he knew he was taking a gun. The statement never says he didn’t know it was in the vehicle. It is implied but it can still be true he didn’t see it or handle it but knew it was in the car and he was taking it to Miles.
ETA- so far Millers whole defense is Plausible Deniability which does not look good.
ETA- so far Millers whole defense is Plausible Deniability which does not look good.
This post was edited on 2/24/23 at 8:46 am
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:44 am to RollTide1987
quote:
No, because he claims that he didn't even know the gun was in the car. You can choose to believe that or not, but assuming he read the text prior to arrival, and assuming he didn't know the gun was in the car, he was probably confused by that text.
Miller's attorney said Miles texted him and asked Miller to bring him his gun.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:45 am to WDE24
quote:
I certainly have enough circumstantial evidence for PC.
Then charge him.
Popular
Back to top
