Started By
Message
That non call needs to be investigated.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:46 pm
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:46 pm
I don't like the targeting rule....But if you have the rule, call it!
This post was edited on 1/1/25 at 5:01 pm
9
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:57 pm to volinknox
quote:
That non call needs to be investigated. I don't like the targeting rule....But if you have the rule, call it!
It is funny how these Texas guys are down voting these posts about targeting.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:58 pm to Gunga Din
There was no targeting, most of you cry that targeting is ruining the game.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:00 pm to 82Horn
quote:
There was no targeting, most of you cry that targeting is ruining the game.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. "However, if a player is defenseless, you can’t initiate contact above the shoulders, even if you don’t lead with the crown.
Players are also prohibited from targeting and making forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless player with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder."
This post was edited on 1/1/25 at 5:01 pm
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:00 pm to 82Horn
quote:
There was no targeting, most of you cry that targeting is ruining the game.
Clearly this guy knows it was targeting. How... because had it been against a tx player.... they would storm the gates w/targeting signs!
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:01 pm to volinknox
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:01 pm to SouthernInsanity
Definitely targeting, but lets quit pretending that means they would have won the game with their kicking woes (which we definitely had).
Maybe they shouldn't have given up a 4th and 13 TD, followed by another TD and 2 point attempt immediately afterwards.
Maybe they shouldn't have given up a 4th and 13 TD, followed by another TD and 2 point attempt immediately afterwards.
This post was edited on 1/1/25 at 5:02 pm
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:02 pm to SlicedBread
Haha reviewed and not ruled targeting.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:04 pm to aero1126
Or should have kicked a field goal from the 2
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:04 pm to 82Horn
I hate the targeting call.......But if it's a rule call it! Clearest targeting I ever saw....And they replayed it!
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:05 pm to volinknox
Investigated by whom?
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:06 pm to aero1126
quote:
Definitely targeting, but lets quit pretending that means they would have won the game with their kicking woes (which we definitely had).
Maybe they shouldn't have given up a 4th and 13 TD, followed by another TD and 2 point attempt immediately afterwards.
Nobody is blaming TX for the non-call, you don't have to be so defensive. It was definitely a horrible non-call. Particularly in replay/slo mo, it is the definition of targeting and is exactly the kind of hit they have been trying to take out of the game for the last 15 years.
The refs and whoever the replay refs are, completely and blatantly fricked that up. It wasn't a close call that could go either way. It was blatant targeting. All ifs ands or buts about the overall result of the game are irrelevant. That was absolutely targeting. And the replay refs absolutely 100% got it wrong and should be suspended.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:06 pm to aero1126
Dude they would have been in fg range with lots of time for a possible td.
Corruption. Huge asterisk win, lol.
Corruption. Huge asterisk win, lol.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:10 pm to WoodyOrnamental
Here you go, bub. Put it in the cup room.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:13 pm to volinknox
STFU
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:13 pm to volinknox
quote:
That non call needs to be investigated.
That's not how things work
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:14 pm to volinknox
Stay mad. We won our playoff games meanwhile you guys lost lmao.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:15 pm to ATXMike
He's right, asterisk u.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:15 pm to volinknox
You would be better served having your doctor investigate your testosterone levels, pussy.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:15 pm to SlicedBread
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News