Started By
Message
re: Texas Teams
Posted on 12/9/24 at 11:59 am to cardboardboxer
Posted on 12/9/24 at 11:59 am to cardboardboxer
I agree with all that
0
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:11 pm to Jimmy Montrose
quote:
Happy for SMU but their rise is going to be bad news for Texas, OU and A&M.
Nah. Players want to play in the NFL on top of NiL and its too easy to frame anything not SEC as "not big boy football." SMU will have a hard ceiling on how well they can recruit.
They might end up as the new OU: they use mid level Texas talent to boatrace through their conference only to get arse blasted in the playoffs. Which given their recent history would be a huge improvement.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:31 pm to BigBro
Come on you know Aggie was educating students three years before your campus started construction
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:43 pm to Jimmy Montrose
quote:
Happy for SMU but their rise is going to be bad news for Texas, OU and A&M.
SMU is a real threat. I’m not mad at them, they have played the system perfectly, beyond perfectly.
They have a serious chance to become what Miami was.
That’s not hyperbole.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:46 pm to cardboardboxer
quote:
Nah. Players want to play in the NFL on top of NiL and its too easy to frame anything not SEC as "not big boy football." SMU will have a hard ceiling on how well they can recruit.
I guess we can wait to see how the playoffs play out. I have yet to drink the SEC koolaid, and I still like the idea of parity, so if Texas doesn't win I want a non-SEC team to figure out a way to win it all.
Even if SEC does dominate, I'd still prefer a playoff system that limits the number of teams from each conference for the sake of parity. But I'm an old-timer.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:46 pm to cardboardboxer
double post
This post was edited on 12/9/24 at 12:47 pm
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:58 pm to Jimmy Montrose
quote:
Even if SEC does dominate, I'd still prefer a playoff system that limits the number of teams from each conference for the sake of parity. But I'm an old-timer
I would not care too much in a 16 team playoff where conference champs do not receive a first round bye. I think Boise State at #3 is bs.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:07 pm to Old Sarge
Texas has 4 undisputed poll era national titles.
Texas Light has 1 undisputed poll era national title. Aggy had to add some retroactive claims just to make themselves look good for the SEC.
Texas Light has 1 undisputed poll era national title. Aggy had to add some retroactive claims just to make themselves look good for the SEC.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 1:10 pm to BigBro
quote:
I'm bowing out of this argument before Randolph Duke shows up..
I’ve been starting to think MtVernon is Randolph Duke. All he posts about is A&M and you only get that obsessed with a rival school if one them fricked your wife.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 2:40 pm to Oklahomey
Wrong
Posted on 12/9/24 at 2:42 pm to Floki
quote:
All he posts about is A&M
Not even close. You just remember the A&M stuff because it hits the nail on the head.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 3:51 pm to Old Sarge
You’re wrong. I’m right.
TEXAS
- 1963, AP & UPI
- 1969, AP & UPI
- 1970, UPI
- 2005, AP & BCS
TEXAS A&M
- 1939, AP (UPI began in 1950)
TEXAS
- 1963, AP & UPI
- 1969, AP & UPI
- 1970, UPI
- 2005, AP & BCS
TEXAS A&M
- 1939, AP (UPI began in 1950)
Posted on 12/9/24 at 3:53 pm to BigOrangeLoyalist
quote:
As a neutral observer, I’m not sure how A&M could be regarded as big brother in any sense. Texas has an overwhelming lead in the series and significantly more championships.
Not only that but the obsession A&M fans have with Texas is weird. You see "HORNS DOWN" shirts everywhere at A&M games even when they aren't playing them.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 4:19 pm to Old1937
quote:
Quess who isn't one off them .
Not sure what “Quess” means. Is that some gay term at UTrans?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News