Started By
Message
re: Texas NIL deal for Arch Manning
Posted on 5/25/22 at 11:39 am to Colonel Ingus
Posted on 5/25/22 at 11:39 am to Colonel Ingus
quote:
According to tRant, that’s the only reason a 5 star player would go to a team that was 8-4 or under. Texas remains squarely in the mix for his commitment.
Poor kids? Yeah, kinda.
1
Posted on 5/25/22 at 11:40 am to junkfunky
They know nothing about football if they think that beta Sarkisian will be there past this year, maybe next
Posted on 5/25/22 at 11:40 am to rockiee
quote:
Cooper has plenty of money he made himself
How much? Do you caddy for him or something
Posted on 5/25/22 at 11:40 am to AGGIES
quote:How many of those kids in 2018 and 2019 did Steve Sarkisian recruit?
Zero. A Texas team that has the 3rd best recruiting class in 2018 and 2019 and a top 10 class in 2020 couldn’t get one player taken in the draft.
So out of all the 4-5 stars on the roster - Sark put zero kids in the NFL
quote:The one kid on the team last year he did recruit had one of the best receiving seasons in Texas football history, but freshmen are not draft eligible.
Zero
Meanwhile, you're more focused on Texas than answering valid questions about your own school who supposedly signed the greatest football season ever despite having not played in a conference title since most of the recruits' parents were in high school...
Posted on 5/25/22 at 11:41 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Well, you see, there's this whole very large difference in Arch Mannings financial situation and 95% of other 5-stars that allows him and his family to pay zero attention to NIL signing bonuses if they want.
Not to mention he will probably get plenty of real/legit NIL offers no matter where he goes.
Posted on 5/25/22 at 11:41 am to XWing atAliciousness
A Texas team that has the 3rd best recruiting class in 2018 and 2019 and a top 10 class in 2020 couldn’t get one player taken in the draft.
Posted on 5/25/22 at 11:42 am to Colonel Ingus
quote:
It’s got everyone here obsessed, mostly you Cry bitch!
This is when you know someone’s feathers are ruffled. I know it’s an oxymoron but you are one of the weaker Aggies on here so it’s not shocking to see you crumble so easily.
Posted on 5/25/22 at 11:42 am to AGGIES
And not one of those players left from any of those recruiting classes? And they were all recruited by Sarkisian, for his system?
Context matters. I don't blame you for willingly ignoring it though, because a&m's football history is pathetic in comparison to the longhorns' no matter what the category
Context matters. I don't blame you for willingly ignoring it though, because a&m's football history is pathetic in comparison to the longhorns' no matter what the category
Posted on 5/25/22 at 11:44 am to BadaBingBadaBoom
quote:
Y’all mother frickers are full of shite! Why don’t y’all grow a set of balls and just admit it!
They did at first. The. They realized that what little rules the NCAA had around NIL, paying them to attend a specific university was one of them.
Congrats aTm, y’all broke one of the few rules established.
Posted on 5/25/22 at 11:45 am to XWing atAliciousness
Nothing can be as pathetic as going 5-7 in the Big 12 with those recruits and losing to Kansas at home
Posted on 5/25/22 at 11:47 am to texag7
quote:
How much? Do you caddy for him or something
It is easy to google but amazing dis I guess
Sorry you got caught talking out your arse
Posted on 5/25/22 at 11:48 am to ColoradoAg
quote:
They know nothing about football if they think that beta Sarkisian will be there past this year, maybe next
I don't know. Fisher has been at 8&4feit for a few years now, and hasn't yet had a SEC title contender.
Posted on 5/25/22 at 11:50 am to XWing atAliciousness
quote:
How many of those kids in 2018 and 2019 did Steve Sarkisian recruit?
So...he cant develop players enough to get them drafted?
Why would a good player want to go to a guy who couldnt develop?
also I thought you were Texas? your name recruits. So are those older guys not good players? does Texas not recruit itself well?
Posted on 5/25/22 at 11:52 am to AGGIES
quote:On queue
Nothing can be as pathetic as going 5-7 in the Big 12 with those recruits and losing to Kansas at home
Didn't y'all go 4-8 in that same conference shortly before leaving due to getting owned by Texas and OU too much on a consistent basis? OUCH
Posted on 5/25/22 at 11:52 am to XWing atAliciousness
This thread is about Texas’ NIL plan to buy Arch Manning following a pathetic 5-7 football season where ZERO players where drafted. We already know Texas bought that Top 5 class this year.
Posted on 5/25/22 at 11:53 am to XWing atAliciousness
quote:
Quinn Ewers was a former 1.000 prospect on 247 currently on campus, and Arch Manning, who also is held in the same regard on 247, has Texas as one of his finalists.
Both are tremendously overhyped.
1.000 rating should be reserved for a player that can go to a top program and be a 3 year starter before going to the NFL. Quinn Ewers was not that guy. That’s not necessarily his fault, it’s the recruiting services and media for overhyping him. He may end up being a good QB but almost nobody should be a 1.000. Maybe 1 every decade.
Same with Arch. He’s a good quarterback but he does not play against the top competition in his state. His film doesn’t really impress me that much. I would rate him as a high 4 star but the 1.000 rating for him is absurd.
This post was edited on 5/25/22 at 11:55 am
Posted on 5/25/22 at 11:54 am to GamecockUltimate
quote:In one year? A lot of coaches are like that. A lot of players also transferred that may be draft eligible at other schools (Keayonte Ingram was drafted out of USC this year after playing 3 years at Texas, Casey Thompson could be drafted out of Nebraska this year, etc.)
So...he cant develop players enough to get them drafted?
quote:Idk, ask the players that committed to the No. 5 overall class last year or the No. 1 recruit that this thread is about
Why would a good player want to go to a guy who couldnt develop?
quote:Obviously the older players couldn't have been that good if we fired the last coach, struggled last year, and have 40 new scholarship players joining this year to completely rebuild...
also I thought you were Texas? your name recruits. So are those older guys not good players? does Texas not recruit itself well?
You're trying way too hard.
Posted on 5/25/22 at 11:54 am to BLG
Sarkisian looks like Pee Wee Herman
Posted on 5/25/22 at 11:55 am to XWing atAliciousness
quote:
Didn't y'all go 4-8 in that same conference shortly before leaving due to getting owned by Texas and OU too much on a consistent basis? OUCH
Truth bomb!
Hook'em
Posted on 5/25/22 at 11:56 am to Colonel Ingus
quote:Lol why? Because he wasn't starting over a heisman finalist at Ohio State despite being the age of a highschool senior?
1.000 rating should be reserved for a player that can go to a top program and be a 3 year starter before going to the NFL. Quinn Ewers was not that guy.
quote:Almost nobody is, that's the point. And again, how do you know for certain he's overhyped if he's the age of a true freshman that hasn't even played yet?
He may end up being a good QB but almost nobody should be a 1.000. Maybe 1 every decade. That’s not necessarily his fault, it’s the recruiting services and media for overhyping him.
Also, don't you think it's a little ironic that you can accuse other teams of having overhyped recruits but celebrate your "greatest recruiting class of all time" (as determined by the recruiting services) in the same thread?
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News