Started By
Message
re: Stetson Bennett vs. Bryce Young
Posted on 2/18/22 at 8:47 am to atlanta917
Posted on 2/18/22 at 8:47 am to atlanta917
You do realize, that in 2020 the SEC only played a all SEC schedule right?
So we were going to have less teams ranked than normal bc we all beat each other up.
And A&M played the two SEC teams that were in the SEC championship.
Well you finally admitted your regular season schedule was average which was my main point from the start. Wish you had done that earlier and would have saved us both a lot of time.
Oh and posting the back up Clemson QB stats to try and say missing Lawrence and their defensive starters is comical. That back up QB failed on multiple occasions in key times in the second half. If he just makes one play at a key time, they win. If you don’t think Lawrence would have made a difference. Lol. See ACC championship game. Geez
So we were going to have less teams ranked than normal bc we all beat each other up.
And A&M played the two SEC teams that were in the SEC championship.
Well you finally admitted your regular season schedule was average which was my main point from the start. Wish you had done that earlier and would have saved us both a lot of time.
Oh and posting the back up Clemson QB stats to try and say missing Lawrence and their defensive starters is comical. That back up QB failed on multiple occasions in key times in the second half. If he just makes one play at a key time, they win. If you don’t think Lawrence would have made a difference. Lol. See ACC championship game. Geez
This post was edited on 2/18/22 at 9:05 am
2
Posted on 2/18/22 at 8:47 am to Whentheleveebreaks
quote:
I prefer the 4 best teams getting in the playoff.
Then you should’ve been fine with A&M not making it. Notre Dame had the better resume. Only reason the records were similar is because Notre Dame played an extra game with a top 4 team.
Posted on 2/18/22 at 8:48 am to Whentheleveebreaks
quote:
Well you finally admitted your regular season schedule was average which was my main point from the start. Wish you had done that earlier and would have saved us both a lot of time.
I never said it was an insane schedule. From the start I said it was better than A&M’s in 20.
Posted on 2/18/22 at 9:05 am to Whentheleveebreaks
quote:
Well you finally admitted your regular season schedule was average which was my main point from the start. Wish you had done that earlier and would have saved us both a lot of time.
He literally said it was decent earlier. You just suck at comprehending words
Posted on 2/18/22 at 9:11 am to djsdawg
UGA was one yard from finding out just how weak that schedule really was. Okie State wins, they were in.
Cincy had the better resume than UGA , you would have been OUT.
Unbeaten conference champs with a Top Ten win, plus a win in their conference title game as good as any of yours.
UGA not a conference winner plus coming off a beating,and no marquis wins.
Cincy had the better resume than UGA , you would have been OUT.
Unbeaten conference champs with a Top Ten win, plus a win in their conference title game as good as any of yours.
UGA not a conference winner plus coming off a beating,and no marquis wins.
This post was edited on 2/18/22 at 9:15 am
Posted on 2/18/22 at 9:14 am to antibarner
quote:
Well you finally admitted your regular season schedule was average which was my main point from the start. Wish you had done that earlier and would have saved us both a lot of time.
You are still wrong about this. Uga had the better overall resume
Posted on 2/18/22 at 9:27 am to antibarner
Exactly
If they can keep two SEC teams out of the playoff, they would have done it.
As I pointed out from the start. The PAC and big 12 not having a one loss champion benefitted them.
It would have been interesting to see if they would have put the Bearcats or bulldogs in the playoff. I keep seeing ND had a better win than A&M the year before. So would they had said the bearcats win over ND gets them in.
If they can keep two SEC teams out of the playoff, they would have done it.
As I pointed out from the start. The PAC and big 12 not having a one loss champion benefitted them.
It would have been interesting to see if they would have put the Bearcats or bulldogs in the playoff. I keep seeing ND had a better win than A&M the year before. So would they had said the bearcats win over ND gets them in.
This post was edited on 2/18/22 at 9:28 am
Posted on 2/18/22 at 9:34 am to antibarner
quote:
Cincy had the better resume than UGA , you would have been OUT.
Do what? Cincy was the fourth seed and the committee ranked UGA over them.Not changing with a OSU win.
quote:
UGA not a conference winner plus coming off a beating,and no marquis wins
Hilarious coming from a fan of a team that didn't even win their division and still made it in '17
Posted on 2/18/22 at 9:35 am to Whentheleveebreaks
quote:
they can keep two SEC teams out of the playoff, they would have done it.
This is a silly thought.
Cincy was a good G5 team, but don’t confuse them with an elite P5 team. The committee wouldn’t have.
Posted on 2/18/22 at 10:40 am to BrotherDawg84
quote:
Ring vs No Ring.
Are you really going to throw this as some qualifier for someone being a better QB. Stetson Bennett is in the rarified air with:
AJ McCarron
Cardale Jones
Greg McElroy
Matt FLynn
Chris Leake
Matt Mauck
Ken Dorsey
Chris Weinke
I'm sure your retarded arse thinks they were the best QBs in college football those years by your crack logic.
Posted on 2/18/22 at 10:42 am to djsdawg
The committee has shown they will do whatever they want and they are not consistent except for showing bias whenever there are not obvious teams.
The only consistent thing they have done is not have rematches in the semis so far of teams from the same conferences.
The only consistent thing they have done is not have rematches in the semis so far of teams from the same conferences.
Posted on 2/18/22 at 10:44 am to PeleofAnalytics
quote:
AJ McCarron
Was a 4 star qb out of high school and would thrive in the current Alabama offense
Posted on 2/18/22 at 10:58 am to C W
quote:
Was a 4 star qb out of high school and would thrive in the current Alabama offense
Nothing I said counters that.
My point was pretty clear that winning a championship does not mean you are the best QB. McCarron was the 9th QB taken in the draft. He has 4 starts in his career. He most definitely was not the best QB in college football while he was at Alabama.
Posted on 2/18/22 at 11:21 am to Whentheleveebreaks
quote:
The committee has shown they will do whatever they want and they are not consistent except for showing bias whenever there are not obvious teams.
Maybe so, But they damn sure haven’t shown they have a major issue with putting 2 sec teams into the playoff like you insist.
Posted on 2/18/22 at 11:32 am to djsdawg
You are correct, well unless there’s another 1 loss power 5 conference champion or Notre Dame in play.
Posted on 2/18/22 at 11:34 am to Whentheleveebreaks
quote:
The committee has shown they will do whatever they want and they are not consistent except for showing bias whenever there are not obvious teams.
Sigh
It's normally not til late fall that I have to correct people on the topic, I don't feel like starting it this early this go around. I'll just say that you're extremely incorrect, and the committee has been remarkably consistent eveyr year. The only people that complain about the committee are typically people that have been left out.
Posted on 2/18/22 at 11:39 am to Whentheleveebreaks
quote:
You are correct, well unless there’s another 1 loss power 5 conference champion or Notre Dame in play.
They have never left out a team that was the quality of uga 2021. The best team they left out was uga 2018, but it lost 2 games, and they have never put a 2 loss team in. Seems consistent.
Posted on 2/18/22 at 11:40 am to WG_Dawg
Committee got lucky last year. After all the games were played there were easily 4 teams to pick.
But
If OSU scores instead of being stopped at the 1 ft line. Then we would have seen, what do they do?
Assuming that puts OSU in.
Do they pick Bearcats or Bulldogs?
Most likely Bulldogs.
But if it were an undefeated Notre Dame team. It would have been OSU and them. Even though Georgia was the better team.
But
If OSU scores instead of being stopped at the 1 ft line. Then we would have seen, what do they do?
Assuming that puts OSU in.
Do they pick Bearcats or Bulldogs?
Most likely Bulldogs.
But if it were an undefeated Notre Dame team. It would have been OSU and them. Even though Georgia was the better team.
This post was edited on 2/18/22 at 11:43 am
Posted on 2/18/22 at 11:43 am to Whentheleveebreaks
quote:
Committee got lucky last year
they've gotten it right literally every single year.
quote:
But
If OSU scores instead of being stopped at the 1 ft line. Then we would have seen, what do they do?
Assuming the puts OSU in.
Do they pick Bearcats or Bulldogs?
that scenario didn't play out so there is no way to know, nor does it matter. You are getting yourself worked up over a made up hypothetical scenario that doesn't exist in reality.
Posted on 2/18/22 at 11:50 am to WG_Dawg
The main argument used against A&M last year was margin of the loss at Bama. That’s what was said prior to the conference championship games.
Then Notre Dame gets blasted at a neutral field. So they got quiet on the margin of the loss talk and went back to them barely beating the Clemson team with our several Clemson starters.
And it changed nothing. Meaning all the decisions were already made. They didn’t get it right.
Then Notre Dame gets blasted at a neutral field. So they got quiet on the margin of the loss talk and went back to them barely beating the Clemson team with our several Clemson starters.
And it changed nothing. Meaning all the decisions were already made. They didn’t get it right.
Page 4 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News