Started By
Message
re: State courts have no jurisdiction to issue TROs in conflict with SEC rules
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:12 pm to Jk121
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:12 pm to Jk121
Vote LSU out and figure this out in real time:
Media Deals
Sponsorships
Ticket Sales
CFP Considerations
Game Forfeits
Future Scheduling
All other SEC Sports
Vote of no confidence coming for Sankey
Media Deals
Sponsorships
Ticket Sales
CFP Considerations
Game Forfeits
Future Scheduling
All other SEC Sports
Vote of no confidence coming for Sankey
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:12 pm to jonnyanony
quote:
Why would a lawyer spend 200 clerk hours for a suit that bears no fruit? I can think of a few reasons.
Bears no fruit? At minimum, these players will be granted damages equal to their NIL payments last season.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:12 pm to RB10
quote:
Well, LSU could have rostered them if they wanted” isn’t going to fly in court.
What court?
It has been said 100 times on the rant that lane never intended to roster them.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:13 pm to meansonny
quote:
Chambliss was a different situation than the nfl.
Texas
Oklahoma
Missouri
South Carolina
Arkansas
All roster players ruled ineligble by the NcAA and SEC because of a court ordered restraining order.
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 10:15 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:14 pm to meansonny
quote:
What court?
Are you fricking dense?
The players will file a lawsuit in the same district that granted their restraining order.
I mean, come on man.
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 10:14 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:14 pm to RB10
quote:
“Well, LSU could have rostered them if they wanted” isn’t going to fly in court.
I think it would fly pretty easily.
1. We have rules
2. LSU and the other 15 members voted for the rules
3. The other 15 voted for punishment if you break the rules
4. LSU decided to comply with said rules
LSU had multiple alternatives.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:14 pm to RB10
quote:
Bears no fruit? At minimum, these players will be granted damages equal to their NIL payments last season.
Look up the definition of NIL.
It can't be "tied to playing football".
You wouldn't be admitting that LSU is illegally promising NIL payments?
Are they promising playing payments? Incentive payments? Those aren't allowed.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:15 pm to RB10
quote:
All roster players ruled ineligble by the NcAA and SEC because of a court ordered restraining order.
Ineligible because of the nfl contracts?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:16 pm to RB10
quote:
The players will file a lawsuit in the same district that granted their restraining order.
Yup.
Worst case, LSU settles with them. Regardless, LSU made the correct calculation (in the end) that these two players were not a hill worth dying on.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:16 pm to meansonny
quote:
Look up the definition of NIL.
It can't be "tied to playing football". You wouldn't be admitting that LSU is illegally promising NIL payments? Are they promising playing payments? Incentive payments? Those aren't allowed.
This isn’t just about “playing” you fricking waterhead.
It’s about limiting eating potential. It the literal basis of the lawsuit that Diego Pavia won against he NCAA and SEC.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:17 pm to RB10
quote:
It’s about limiting eating potential
You are making up so much shite.
This is funny
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:17 pm to meansonny
quote:
Ineligible because of the nfl contracts?
Why they were ruled ineligible is irrelevant.
“Signed an NFL contract” isn’t the only rule the SEC has.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:17 pm to RB10
quote:
It’s about limiting eating potential.
That probably would have helped Harris keep his roster spot with the saints.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:17 pm to meansonny
quote:
You are making up so much shite.
You can check out Diego Pavia’s lawsuit for yourself.
You probably should. You’re woefully uninformed.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:18 pm to RB10
The SEC doesn’t have a rule for medical redshirts.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:18 pm to RB10
quote:
“Signed an NFL contract” isn’t the only rule the SEC has.
That is the rule which has the punishments which the rant is bitching about.
There are lines not to be crossed.
You know that Saban sat lane down, right?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:19 pm to pankReb
quote:
That probably would have helped Harris keep his roster spot with the saints.
Harris would have gone on IR, making $0 dollars for the season.
He didn’t have a guaranteed contract, or a signing bonus.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:19 pm to pankReb
quote:
The SEC doesn’t have a rule for medical redshirts.
Doesn't matter, Chambliss didn't receive a medical redshirt.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:19 pm to RB10
quote:
It’s about limiting eating potential.
The reason this was so successful in the past is because it was levied at the NCAA, which has an effective monopoly on the ability for college players to make substantial money from (in theory) their name, image, and likeness while playing college football.
The SEC does not have that effective monopoly.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:19 pm to RB10
It’s a joke dummy because he was overweight. Calm down.
Popular
Back to top


0






